SleuthyGal
Former Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 4,078
- Reaction score
- 1
Now to confuse the issue a little more...let's take this a step further!
{snip}
BC#178…10:00 to 10:30 HP calls and I tell her Nancy is not home yet..Probably getting COFFEE
BC #179….states between 10:45 and 11:00 JA called. I told her Nancy was running about an hour late, maybe getting COFFEE
He tells JA she is running about an hour late…did he expect her home @ 10:00?
Did BC ever state he called or stopped by JJ?
Why then did he have tennis plans and postpone them at 9:15 if he knew she was to be gone to approx 10am per his affidavit and what he told JA?
Where is this tennis partner he was to play tennis with?
He literally has his times so messed up and what he says he said none of it matches! At this point he has himself confused without even seeing what he had just stated in his own affidavit.
Yes, he has himself and everyone else confused I think. Certainly me! LOL. Obviously I think he didn't 'expect her home' at any time, ever again.
I think he SAID she was 'running an hour late' as a way of buying more time with the friends who called and I'm not sure if he was actually counting the hours in his head and realizing that he was, in essence, saying that Nancy had already been 'out running' for 3 to 4 hrs and I'm sure he wasn't expecting to have to tell L.E. that she left home around 7am. BTW, THIS is why I don't believe he KNEW about the plans she had to paint at JA's starting at 8am. Wouldn't he have realized that JA would CALL HIM when Nancy failed to show...at least eventually that morning? Did he think that JA would not notice or care that NC bailed on their plans and just let it go and not follow-up? If yes, he didn't know JA very well and/or simply didn't think any of this through. (more proof of lack of planning which puts another checkmark in the 'heat-of-the-moment' murder scenario).
I'm curious WHAT was going on in that brain of his because the timeline is ALWAYS something LE nails down hour-by-hour if possible, and they further cross-reference it with each involved person's activities, movements, calls, etc. But yes you've nailed an important detail: he tells 2 separate NC friends that she is 'probably getting coffee' and when he goes to search he does not search JJ (or at least doesn't say he did).
So, in regards to 'the coffee excuse' he's screwed up on the following; let's review:
1. Tells TWO separate friends that NC is 'probably/maybe getting coffee' and that's the reason she's 'running about an hour late,' 3 - 4 hours after she 'left to go jogging.'
2. KNOWS and TELLS LE as well as puts it in affidavit that NC runs WITHOUT cell phone, or any money or wallet or anything (but a stick of gum)....therefore the logical inference is she would not be able to purchase coffee even if she wanted to (unless 'Carrie the running partner' who had no plans w/Nancy, ran with money and bought her some coffee).
3. When he's out searching he does NOT go to JJ (her fave coffee place) to inquire if she was there at any point that morning.
So 'Nancy probably out getting coffee' = really stupid made up excuse AND it's so stupid he didn't even pretend to look for her at JJ when he was out 'searching.' (and believe me, if he had made a visit to JJ to inquire, he would have said so in his affidavit).
BONEHEADED maneuver. I rate that a -1 on the 'setting the timeline' scale. (The East German judge was not impressed. The Russian judge threw their scorecards down in disgust, and the Romanian judge is still scratching his head).
To put it in terms he would understand: it's like he released a product that has a section of software code that calls out another area of the code and then when the software instruction goes out to find it's 'call,' there's nothing there but a blank line....and for some reason the code was never QA'd, and it was put into production and sent out to customers.
REALLY bad form in both software engineering AND murder timeline planning. Only one will end in a prison term though. :wink: