- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
- Messages
- 289
- Reaction score
- 2,501
Wait. A van just happened to break down? Like, she hasn't seen the van in awhile and that was his excuse? FIND THAT VAN!
JMO.
JMO.
I was thinking that same thing. It definitely looked like some sort of delivery best. Amazon or something.Thinking back to the security camera footage of the neighbor in Nancy’s neighborhood who had a trespasser… was the trespasser wearing a FedEx uniform or something similar?
I thought the MIL said in the interview I watched, that she gave them permission to search whatever they wanted, or something to that effect. Whether a warrant was obtained or not, wouldn't her permission grant them legal access?One of the legal folks said they can enter without warrant under certain circumstances when there is an abduction. LE often cuffs other occupants while they secure the scene then release them fairly quickly.
I was thinking that same thing. It definitely looked like some sort of delivery best. Amazon or something.
It's being reported by the homeowner. She let them search her house and said, "Come on inside".
I've found a 36 year old, same exact name, previous address right where police are right now. I'm inclined to think this is the bitcoin ransom guy, if police taking all his electronics.Not saying a name, but think people might have it wrong as we have a Sr, and Jr with the same name. Think younger.
She was gesturing off screen and I took to it mean it was over there.Wait. A van just happened to break down? Like, she hasn't seen the van in awhile and that was his excuse? FIND THAT VAN!
JMO.
But she offered vs said “no,you can’t “ so if she said no maybe they would have pulled the warrant. They tried to be nice vs threatening imo.It's being reported by the homeowner. She let them search her house and said, "Come on inside".
Giving benefit of doubt but things aren't looking good for this guy.Wait. A van just happened to break down? Like, she hasn't seen the van in awhile and that was his excuse? FIND THAT VAN!
JMO.
https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/na...om-02-10-26?post-id=cmlhhbq8g00003b6qbw2q253o
The homeowner, when interviewed, stated that a warrant was not presented. Perhaps she is mistaken, but perhaps she isn't.
I apologize if this seems out of line, but considering that we have recently seen warrants are no longer deemed necessary for certain interventions, that might be the case here. If the tipster, for whatever reason, said it was in a home where an "illegal immigrant family" lives, a warrant might not have been used.
Until such a time as this is clarified, we have to give this woman the benefit of doubt. She claims to have no knowledge of the matter, and no NG hidden in her home (which was the reason given for the intervention).
In my opinion, we are all so intent on seeing a resolution to this matter that we are trying to identify people through name searches, news articles...I didn't think this was allowed. I thought that was frowned upon.
If I am mistaken, apologies for being "the wrong kind of stickler for detail", but this case now involves a very loaded aspect: the possibility that a POC is involved, and the current social climate in this nation is fraught enough already.
I suggest we take a step back and let LE do their job, identify if the person of interest should be charged with a crime, and then go from there.
I agree this has all gotten very sad on multiple levels. The worst being that NG has not been found. I agree it's time to log off for a bit...
Yes. Its called exigent circumstances.Can someone confirm that LE doesn't have to have a search warrant if they think someone's life is in imminent danger?
This is not the house. Use Regrid app and you can see exactly where the MIL lives, as she’s listed on the deed as one of the owners. A man with the name she gave also has his name at the address. It is not the corner houseYes. There was a black Camero style car, black Chevy truck and white "toy" hauler trailer in the google street view.