- Joined
- Aug 12, 2007
- Messages
- 5,007
- Reaction score
- 30,025
or a breed of catI think it's ok if you're talking about a rug.
or a breed of catI think it's ok if you're talking about a rug.
Agree. I keep giving him the benefit of the doubt. But, at this point, if the Sheriff is not sharing key evidence with the FBI, this is a huge problem and totally unacceptable. JMOI have held off on commenting on this sheriff for a number of reasons, mostly being that this case is pretty unprecedented and I can’t imagine being in his position. However, after everything that has happened in this investigation, I have to wonder if he is either just unbelievably in over his head or if he’s purposefully messing this up. In a situation like this, I think any decent sheriff wanting to solve the case would take guidance from FBI (like in the idaho 4 case.) To not only ignore their input but to purposefully go against it is at best a little weird and at worst corruption. JMO.
If she's missing there will certainly be a financial audit by her POA. Her house is in a revokable trust in her name. Assuming she has her three children on the trust there any fraud or illegal activity are going to come to light.People keep asking that but don't seem to realise that the benefit in a missing person is that they can't change their inheritance or out someone for a fraud or other crime being committed.
Not all men. But maybe enough for it to be problematic.Men have huge egos.
Yes we don't know if it was just a practical decision which is being blown out of proportion or if it is a symptom of deeper problems.yes. Also makes you wonder if he has something major to hide. James Burke of the Gilgo Beach investigation certainly did.
Edited to add that a poster upthread mentioned that possibly the sheriff simply used the lab because it was already working with DNA in this case and would have everything together for faster results. To me, that makes a lot of sense.
This is absolutely insane! Someone posted up thread that in an interview about the case, someone basically said this sheriff had created a toxic work environment. MOO from previous posts.Here’s the Reuters report. Prepare to be enraged:
![]()
Exclusive-FBI blocked from key access to evidence in Nancy Guthrie abduction case, source says
By Jana Winter WASHINGTON, Feb 12 (Reuters) - An Arizona sheriff is blocking FBI access to key evidence in the investigation into the abduction of U.S. television journalist Savannah Guthrie's mother,uk.news.yahoo.com
Thanks, that would've been weird but i couldn’t really tell on the door cam videoNo, never seen Lantana grown vertical
Taking ransom out of the equation (using only what we know) the perpetrator (s) benefit is unknown. What did they get out of this? It seems deeply personal but the masked perp throws me off unless he's hired.
It is my understanding that the sheriff is in charge because it's local; FBI brought in to assist. Obvious, however, FBI is more knowledgeable, has more experience and resources. Got to be an ego thing with the sheriff.Investigation is under the authority of Sheriff's Department with FBI Assisting. Agree that this must be about ego. And it's impeding the investigation and making it move slower since FBI will only get the evidence after the private agency that the Sheriff sent the evidence. MOO
Did NG have a connection to local law enforcement /sheriff?Yes we don't know if it was just a practical decision which is being blown out of proportion or if it is a symptom of deeper problems.
Jewelers, musicians, pilots, people in show business. Amazing, but shows me how common bite lights are.Jewelers and musicians you say?
You think that Occam's Razor = SIL/AG with no criminal record that has ever been reported (and it would have been at this point) suddenly killed an EIGHTY FOUR year old woman (her MOTHER) for the inheritance, hid the body well enough that it will take years to declare her dead to get said money, turned over their house, their car to LE with nothing found to arrest them as of yet and dressed up as a masked man to perform on a camera feed that was destroyed and found 2 weeks later?? You don't think this sounds contrived? I agree in normal situations absent evidence or data the last person to be seen with the victim when they were alive needs a hard look as a top suspect (and especially immediate family). But when info comes out that is contradictory occam's razor doesn't always point to them anymore. There is other information that makes it much less likely to be them imo.Bingo! Inheritance, fraud or to cover up another crime.
Occam’s razor.
At this time, I think it’s to cover up another crime, seems most likely. Remove person who might snitch (NG). I am very open to changing my mind.
JMO
IMO not that anyone has reportedDid NG have a connection to local kaw enforcement /sheriff?
I live in the Tucson area and have personal experience with Nanos and his staff. Between the PCSD deputies harassing people in poor areas, not responding to urgent calls, etc. I am not surprised that things are going this way. One day, my spouse and I were driving home and encountered an elderly man (75-80ish) and his dog being gruesomely attacked by two pitbulls. By the time we arrived, the man and his dog were on the ground, the man's clothing partially torn off and blood was everywhere. My husband jumped out of the car and tried to help while I called 911. Needless to say, Pima County Sheriffs office "declined" the call and said they would not come for a dog attack and then transferred me to the fire department - which also declined the call. I begged for anyone to come or to send an ambulance - but they refused. A second incident happened when a neighbor's home was being broken into and we called PCSD and they also refused to come unless someone was home at the neighbor's and injured. After those two incidents, I realized they were not there to help average citizens and had their own agenda.I have held off on commenting on this sheriff for a number of reasons, mostly being that this case is pretty unprecedented and I can’t imagine being in his position. However, after everything that has happened in this investigation, I have to wonder if he is either just unbelievably in over his head or if he’s purposefully messing this up. In a situation like this, I think any decent sheriff wanting to solve the case would take guidance from FBI (like in the idaho 4 case.) To not only ignore their input but to purposefully go against it is at best a little weird and at worst corruption. JMO.
IMO my vibe as wellI dont think it ever was a kidnapping, I think it was a staged kidnapping to hide a murder.
Lastly, NG may no longer be alive. Although family doesn't want to acknowledge this, they know it's reality.It could have a number of reasons IMO.
SG is also a lawyer and maybe she simply doesn't value the notes to be real.
The FBI could have advised against it with some sort of logical explanation.
The fam wants some proof before paying.
Maybe the ransom notes as we know them has been taken out of context and contain not much info to go on, nothing valuable for the fam. The notes never went public.
They said they will pay but i can imagine first wanting to have some sort of evidence they are communicating with the right person(s).
I really have no clue, it's all just IMO![]()
Is there any chance that the private lab could process it quicker than the FBI lab? I'm curious.Wait! Hold up, instead of allowing FBI to utilize Quantico. This local sheriff wants to send evidence to a private lab in Florida. I’m so dumbfounded by this Sheriff.
I hope Locals remember this when they hit polling locations
Might not be the same man but could be working together.I don't think the man in the TMZ video is the same as the man in Nancy's camera video because even though Nancy's camera video is in black and white, you can tell the backpack is a lighter color than the coat. And in TMZ's video, it's the opposite. The backpack is black and the coat is a lighter color.