I wholeheartedly agree.
This is all my own opinion but it certainly raised my spidey senses when I discovered NG's daughter A/potentially with or without her husband were the last to see Nancy. Then were the ones allegedly called by a church goer at 11am. We all know DM are not the go to trustworthy source but where did they get this intel?
It makes absolute sense Nancy would attend church virtually - her mobility is extremely poor, and she loves I'm constant pain. Online is the most logical option. Our local church service you cannot see other participants. Obviously if this small fact - if DM have it wrong and actually you can see the list of participants that removes the suspicion. Without confirmation it seems extremely suspicious to me that daughter A was also the one who 'raised the alarm'.
However I still feel strongly they need to look closer at those who last saw her.. the open rear door and blood on the front door step make me wonder if something, accident or not, happened when Nancy was dropped home which led to the blood. Could the scene then have been staged, signs of a break in and disturb the scene out of I don't know...fear. and around 2am the perpetrator/s removed Nancy through the back door. Both cameras smashed show knowledge of the home.
How often would an apple watch sync to a pacemaker? Sorry if it's already been answered. I am not an apple person.