- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Messages
- 7,161
- Reaction score
- 88,192
I think the ransom note is a deflection strategy by the same perp who took her.
Its not that i dont think she is capable, its just that she is 10 minutes away. I would have picked her up.My
grandmother is over 10 years older than NG, and is extremely independent and lives alone, catching taxis, going shopping and out to social events regularly-with mobility issues similar to Nancy.
She would be horrified to hear you and others don’t think her capable of doing these things or that her family are neglecting her by allowing her to live how she wants.
Older people are not babies, they are quite often perfectly capable of making their own decisions.
I do think there are quite a few posters here who lean more toward SA as the motive in this case.I don’t know.
Someone argue me. What evidence is there to show this is someone who was close to get vs something like a SA gone wrong
Anyone else think the FBI guy revealed that fact about the 5pm deadline by mistake?!
Sorry if someone already said this, I was typing and am now twenty pages behind!
I still drive by the reservoir where her memorial was regularly, as well as the Starbucks and Albany Ave trash cans, etc. Kind of stinks to be reminded of her so often and know she still hasn't been found.Could have a key pad on the outside. I believe Dulos saw the kids open the door with the keypad and memorized it. This is giving me way too many Jennifer vibes.
The police specifically said that there were multiple cameras. The motion notification was not from the offline doorbell camera.Totally possible. What was the other motion notification from, then, though? Especially if that camera was totally offline 20ish minutes after it was removed.
Maybe they both drove her home.Because Sheriff Nanos has stated earlier in the week that the son-in-law was the last person known to have seen Nancy Guthrie before she disappeared. Sheriff stated earlier that he drove Nancy back to her house.
He has since walked back those comments today and now says "family" drove her home.
I’m guessing maybe 10?Speaking of being a grandmother, how old are the SIL's kids?
Do you think it's relevant to NG's disappearance?Its not that i dont think she is capable, its just that she is 10 minutes away. I would have picked her up.
I read somewhere 9 and 11Speaking of being a grandmother, how old are the SIL's kids?
Yeah, that's so weird. And that's a whole lot of trouble to go through for a ransom. Wouldn't most criminals just make a Grandma call her kids and be like "yes, someone is here. You need to deposit x amount of dollars into this crypto account so they will release me." As in..... before the actual FBI is involved in advising negotiations. Nothing about this situation makes sense.The perp has to be really, really dumb to think he could get away with such an abduction and demands. Every police, sheriff, FBI, state is looking for her, and, assuming the perp is identified (per ransom), there's just no way.
Thanks, I missed that. That goes back to my hypothesis about the police having more motion notifications than they've let on, then, especially if there was any sort of struggle.The police specifically said that there were multiple cameras. The motion notification was not from the offline doorbell camera.
Or maybe the FBI agent who looked young would describe her as grandma because his grandma was around her age. Gives it a personalization.Speaking of being a grandmother, how old are the SIL's kids?
I noticed that, too, about blurting out the ransom deadlineJust adding to this my own point, I looked back at my (rough) transcript and the FBI guy twice quite clearly refuses to be drawn on whether or not there was a time in the ransom note. Then later, while responding to a different question, he blurts out that the deadline is 5pm today. That was my impression as I watched it. I wonder if that was 'accidentally on purpose'. Then when he's asked to clarify that it was 5pm, someone brings out a piece of paper and he walks away from the podium and checks it and then replies also giving the information he has twice refused to give before: the second deadline is Monday. JMO. Or JMI (just my impression!)
Part of me feels like a lot of this press conference was them cunningly sending messages to the abductor, or trying to mess with them in some way.