What evidence?I'm sticking by my initial gut feelings:
- This wasn't a kidnapping and the ransom note isn't real.
- This wasn't committed by the family.
- This wasn't financially motivated.
- NG was removed to destroy evidence.
What evidence?I'm sticking by my initial gut feelings:
- This wasn't a kidnapping and the ransom note isn't real.
- This wasn't committed by the family.
- This wasn't financially motivated.
- NG was removed to destroy evidence.
Exactly. This would be easily verifiable, yet it is not.So if the church phone call thing is something that the FBI is unwilling to verify, doesn't it prove that they don't trust what Annie/SIL are telling them? If no church call to Annie, how did they know to check on her at 11:56?
All in all, we have SIL as the last person to see her alive supposedly dropping her off at 9:48, we have Annie the first person to check on her (for reasons unknown).... seems like the two of them are squarely involved in the entire 14 hour range when things went down....
The criminals might go down there, or be there right now. I agree, I’m sure they didn’t take Nancy to MX, would not return her from there. Too risky.border really likely isn't playing a part here, IMO. It's true it's not that far but it's a couple hours at least, depending on where you're going
No one else seems to be reporting this. I watched Ashley Banfield’s video this morning, where she interviewed Brian Entin and asked whether he had seen or heard anything about the car being towed. He said he hadn’t and mentioned that, with people camped out there around the clock, you would think someone would have witnessed it.Question: Other than Banfield, has anyone said anything corroborating a vehicle was impounded?
My brother "scammed" $165,000 from our parents, who were in their upper 80's, before I became aware that it was happening and put and end to it. He told them scary, sad stories that pulled at their heartstrings (dog needed expensive surgery or it would die, he needed money for attornies as he was being unfairly sued, electricity shut off in winter, busness failings...) Looking back, I wish we had monitored their monies closer, but, I never in a million years thought my brother would do such a thing. It was a live-and-learn situation for sure.A family member or close friend could find much easier ways to obtain money from her, and maybe they have in the past. It merits an examination of who might have money problems. Nonetheless, my speculation is based on someone who is frequents the property and is aware of her circumstances and wealth. Someone who doesn’t have wealth and wants to hit the lottery.
Elderly are so vulnerable to financial predators. A cautionary tale to all. A good fiduciary is essential to elder years.
Amateur opinion and speculation only
It was literally this being removed from the timeline that swayed me in that direction.So if the church phone call thing is something that the FBI is unwilling to verify, doesn't it prove that they don't trust what Annie/SIL are telling them? If no church call to Annie, how did they know to check on her at 11:56?
All in all, we have SIL as the last person to see her alive supposedly dropping her off at 9:48, we have Annie the first person to check on her (for reasons unknown).... seems like the two of them are squarely involved in the entire 14 hour range when things went down....
I know it wasn't me you asked, but if she was killed in the house then the perpetrators DNA might be on her body. Hence why someone would want to remove the body.What evidence?
Why? And evidence for what?I'm sticking by my initial gut feelings:
- This wasn't a kidnapping and the ransom note isn't real.
- This wasn't committed by the family.
- This wasn't financially motivated.
- NG was removed to destroy evidence.
Exactly...so if they verified it, like they verified the Uber driver, why not include it in the timeline. Isn't it "harmless" then?Exactly. This would be easily verifiable, yet it is not.
LOVING the longer thread.Let @tricia know....
she was asking for people to express their thoughts regarding longer threads.
Could alerts have gone to Nancy’s phone, which was left behind? First alert could be the “offline”/went dark one, perhaps second was after it had been removed? Maybe the perpetrator/s triggered something while removing the battery or destroying it?
The app on the Apple Watch replaces the bedside unit-my question is, what happens when out of range of the unit or app?
I don't think it "proves" anything, respectfully. I'm thinking LE just doesn't want to release something that they have yet to verify, or they're trying not to put their foot in their mouth (again).So if the church phone call thing is something that the FBI is unwilling to verify, doesn't it prove that they don't trust what Annie/SIL are telling them? If no church call to Annie, how did they know to check on her at 11:56?
All in all, we have SIL as the last person to see her alive supposedly dropping her off at 9:48, we have Annie the first person to check on her (for reasons unknown).... seems like the two of them are squarely involved in the entire 14 hour range when things went down....
Off-topic but there was actually an Amazon package left by the door too. I guess it was delivered after the crime scene tape went down. So sad.![]()
Yes, the plant at the door also looks like lantana. Doubt it was part of an arrangement.
It's weird that they're so close to the door and not next the the sidewalk. It would seem "juvenile" "immature" to cut a few lantana stems and pass them off as a "gift". Yet, there are people who do this with lantana. (There are little kids who pick mine) I wouldn't expect Nancy to do this. I wouldn't expect another homeowner to do this.
It's almost as if someone came to the door with these in their hand to lure someone out. MOO MOO
Thanks for your observation....
Image source: https://www.justjared.com/photo-gallery/5275540/guthrie-home-01/
I do not see an upset relative ripping off the ring cameras- esp if they were drunk or on drugs, IMO.
This case becomes more baffling by the hour.Latest from Brian Entin....."something else in the letter"
I think something could be happening behind the scenes with this ransom situation.
Part of me hopes the ransom is true and related. However, I feel like in 2025 in the age of information it's not hard to get familiar with an area or person with a quick google search. It really makes me wonder how the letter is worded/what it includes.This case becomes more baffling by the hour.