- Joined
- Jul 27, 2008
- Messages
- 7,548
- Reaction score
- 34,078
I said this yesterday, but I think the timeline given was only intended to show the comings/goings at the house, not everything known.Exactly...so if they verified it, like they verified the Uber driver, why not include it in the timeline. Isn't it "harmless" then?
Notice they don't include details from the party.
They don't include things like when Nancy went to bed (likely known from Apple Watch and phone data of it being put down and not picked up again, etc) or more.
There's also no info on NG's movements that night in her home that cameras may have picked up. That doesn't mean she didn't do anything, IMO, it's just not what they were trying to provide info on I don't think.
Because she never left for church, and after the cameras were removed or destroyed, the only activity at the house they know of at the house after the pacemaker disconnected is when the family arrives, calls 911, and then PD arrives.
I mean, should we assume from the lack of inclusion on the timeline that LE doesn't know when they arrived at the home? Yet we know that happened also.
Just MO.