It was me. 97% successfully returned worldwide when ransom is paid and with professional negotiators. 11% returned if ransom is not paid.
But, “proof of life” is a reasonable request.
If the alleged kidnappers have not provided proof of life, it is another situation.
that "structure" looks like it is on the neighbor's property and is an animal pen, but just my opinion, best guess.To me it looked like they may have removed something from the roof. They were also scrutinizing the front sidewalk, looking in the rock beds in the back yard, and looking at some plants too.
I'm guessing that something in the newest letter sent them back to the house as the title of the video says "drone shows investigators conducting 'follow-up' investigation at Nancy Guthrie's home". They cleared the street in front of the house of media so there wouldn't be any lookie-loos, but apparently they forgot that drones exist.
I'm really curious about the structure that is behind the house in the bushes. Possibly a tree house? I would hope that it has been investigated, but maybe they'll eventually come back and check that out too?![]()
Wow, incredible this is now being verified! We have some sharp-eyed WSers.
Didnt it take them a while to find the 'cameras'? Seems like they were told that they were there by someone....Some thought it was perp watching the house before/after the crime. But most think the LE placed cameras to watch the crime scene. And, some think this is a camera belonging to NG, that may or may not be on a different system.
The “very sensitive information” included has me worriedThis is the second news outlet saying that a letter was well written/structured. That stands out to me.
Are they playing to the ego of the person who wrote it? Are the letters structured in some sort of particularly striking way?
I just don't think that even a "well-written" ransom note would make me publicly comment on the fact that it was well written. Seems like a given that an adult who planned a kidnapping and led law enforcement on a week long wild goose chase could put together some paragraphs.
Maybe the kidnapper is waxing poetic?
MOO
Question: Do we know why the Circle K? And where is that in relation to AG's?My presumption (MOO) about the Teslas is that since Teslas have dash cams, any Teslas in the neighborhood, or near the Circle K (for whatever they think they are looking for there) might provide video footage relevant to the case.
Re the roof camera, I don't know, other than there must be something more than LE removing a camera they themselves placed (one theory proposed on the thread) because I can't fathom they would need to shut down the entire street just for that. IMO LE was looking for something referenced or hinted at in the latest communication received.
MOO
The higher the rewardDoes anyone have any insight as to why the rewards have been so skimpy? I think the first reward was like 2500, and the FBI reward is now 50K. I would think Savannah would put up much more money. Someone knows what happened and enough money would probably draw them out.
Defense attorneys will have a field day with this, ughYes but…IMO, not like this. It’s like they’re being very thorough, but sloppy at the same time - releasing the scene, just to come back, twice. And searching the property three times in less than a week - are they not being thorough? I don’t know, just is something I really haven’t seen play out this way before.
I would hate for them to pay a fake ransom and it embolden a scammer to do it againI say again that NBC could pay the ransom and recoup by having the behind the scenes story of what happened. Do it!! Bring her home and see if this is legit.
Agree - this is really interesting. I wonder if worded in a way that suggests a level of professionalism / things that amateurs don’t typically think of or plan for? Or, perhaps, once all is said and done and it’s released it becomes clear the readers’ impression was shaped by the fact they probably typically receive more disjointed tips and the general chaos of this whole case making basic clarity seem stabilizing.This is the second news outlet saying that a letter was well written/structured. That stands out to me.
Are they playing to the ego of the person who wrote it? Are the letters structured in some sort of particularly striking way?
I just don't think that even a "well-written" ransom note would make me publicly comment on the fact that it was well written. Seems like a given that an adult who planned a kidnapping and led law enforcement on a week long wild goose chase could put together some paragraphs.
Maybe the kidnapper is waxing poetic?
MOO
Incredible that it wasn't removed in the first place, if it is in fact a camera!Wow, incredible this is now being verified! We have some sharp-eyed WSers.
this same investigative pattern of repeat visits to the crime scene by LE happened during the idaho 4 investigation, from what I recall, MOO.Yes but…IMO, not like this. It’s like they’re being very thorough, but sloppy at the same time - releasing the scene, just to come back, twice. And searching the property three times in less than a week - are they not being thorough? I don’t know, just is something I really haven’t seen play out this way before.
Somewhere upthread is a google map link showing where it is. And I recall a mention (unknown if verified) that the Circle K is near AG and SIL's house.Question: Do we know why the Circle K? And where is that in relation to AG's?
Again, I don't think the family is involved, but I'm curious.
ugh. exactly my thoughts. anything found after the first few hours, once the home was secured, is going to be hard to useDefense attorneys will have a field day with this, ugh