- Joined
- Dec 22, 2008
- Messages
- 1,324
- Reaction score
- 10,807
What a heartbreaking video from SG & her siblings. I don’t think there’s any way not to take that message as they have been told their mother has died and that they believe the sender was the person who took her.
Mary Coleman from KOLD TV didn’t give much info about the 2nd message they received other than to say it appeared to be from the same sender the first one came from and that it contained sensitive information but no deadline and would not be characterized as a ransom note but a message and seemed to be a response to the family’s videos. She also said in her mind a ransom note was looking for something in return for something else and this one was not necessarily that.
Was the sensitive information that NG had died? If so but it wasn’t a ransom note - apparently didn’t say send us this amount and we’ll return the body - was there another message today making that offer? Or was the family’s video today making that offer to the one who sent the messages?
I keep asking myself if I would pay if I knew my mother had already died. And I might for 2 reasons. 1) To know for sure that this was not a scam and wonder for years if someone else had been responsible and that maybe she wasn’t dead and I accepted the word of a scammer and gave up searching too soon. 2) If doing so meant it gave the FBI a better shot at catching whoever had done this.
I also keep wondering if the kidnappers would return her body if SG actually pays. I’m not sure I think they would. If she pays they would have their money so why would they risk getting caught by evidence that might be found if they give the location of the body.
I hope that the FBI can solve this and bring her remains home for he family and put these despicable people away for murder.
Mary Coleman from KOLD TV didn’t give much info about the 2nd message they received other than to say it appeared to be from the same sender the first one came from and that it contained sensitive information but no deadline and would not be characterized as a ransom note but a message and seemed to be a response to the family’s videos. She also said in her mind a ransom note was looking for something in return for something else and this one was not necessarily that.
Was the sensitive information that NG had died? If so but it wasn’t a ransom note - apparently didn’t say send us this amount and we’ll return the body - was there another message today making that offer? Or was the family’s video today making that offer to the one who sent the messages?
I keep asking myself if I would pay if I knew my mother had already died. And I might for 2 reasons. 1) To know for sure that this was not a scam and wonder for years if someone else had been responsible and that maybe she wasn’t dead and I accepted the word of a scammer and gave up searching too soon. 2) If doing so meant it gave the FBI a better shot at catching whoever had done this.
I also keep wondering if the kidnappers would return her body if SG actually pays. I’m not sure I think they would. If she pays they would have their money so why would they risk getting caught by evidence that might be found if they give the location of the body.
I hope that the FBI can solve this and bring her remains home for he family and put these despicable people away for murder.