- Joined
- Nov 20, 2023
- Messages
- 6,495
- Reaction score
- 41,222
2-3 can play Maj Jong if need be.Supposition is that mahjong needs 4 players, so 4th must've been the boy. JMO
2-3 can play Maj Jong if need be.Supposition is that mahjong needs 4 players, so 4th must've been the boy. JMO
I can't figure out why they would carry a folding table into the house rather than a forensic evidence collection kit as pointed out by RainyDazeKS yesterday.It can be seen here, it looks like a folded table to me, and yes it was taken into the house and then brought back out at the end.
Some of these reports today are just looking for clicks IMO
I sooooo agree.Putting speculation aside, this really doesn’t make sense operationally. Introducing a high-profile third party into an active ransom situation would almost certainly worsen things, not resolve them.
If a perpetrator believed a billionaire / president had become involved, demands would likely escalate, timelines would change, and negotiations could become performative rather than controlled. That is precisely what professional negotiators try to avoid.
It would also expose the Guthrie family to long-term risk; once it’s known that an outside benefactor will step in, you incentivise repeat extortion, hoaxes, and future blackmail. It is one of the main reasons why third-party intervention is discouraged.
things are closing in on the perps and I think they are not with NG anymore having left her body and will be happy with some ransom in exchange for location to find her.Yep I posted this up-thread but just to add, the kidnappers are allegedly threatening to kill her if the 5pm Monday deadline is not met. That explicit escalation was there this time.
The ransom demander/demanders sure have been lucky that no other leads have been found in the last 7 days. No arrests, no body, no sign of Nancy.Could be connected as they are the ransom demanders OR the ransom demander is just a horrible person that tailgated onto the 'abduction'.. LE has reason for sure to be there. IMO
ha! good to know.2-3 can play Maj Jong if need be.
Picking her up to come to the restaurant with them would also have given them an opportunity to take her home. Taking an Uber there means nothing when it comes to that.So Annie and her husband had NG come to the restaurant in an UBER, which gave them the opportunity to take her home, they probably went in her house to discuss money and an argument broke out, Annie got injured and they knew they would be suspects so they put her in her own car and buried her in the desert MOO.
Probably more like this?Something like this.
??
The UFED (Universal Forensics Extraction Device)
![]()
Cellebrite UFED - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Would be interesting if SIL was both- ransomer and kidnapper/murderer and used the ransom only to divert attention away from himself and knew of the traceability, therefore used a wallet not belonging to him in demands.One of the biggest misconceptions in cases like this is the belief that Bitcoin equals invisibility. It does not. Bitcoin was never designed to be anonymous. It is pseudonymous, and every single transaction is permanently recorded on a public ledger that anyone in the world can analyze.
Law enforcement does not need to “break” Bitcoin. They follow the money. Every transfer creates a traceable chain of movement, and once investigators identify even one real world connection to a wallet, the entire transaction history becomes visible.
Even when people attempt to hide funds using mixers, tumblers, or layered transfers, those methods do not guarantee anonymity. Blockchain activity creates patterns, and patterns can be analyzed over time. In many past cases, funds believed to be hidden were eventually traced once a single mistake, exposure point, or real-world interaction revealed a link.
Another critical factor is that digital currency eventually has to intersect with the real world. When funds touch an exchange, a service, a device, or a person, investigators often gain a foothold. Most cases are not solved because encryption fails, but because human behavior, timing, or one small connection ties digital activity to a real identity.
It is also worth noting that while more privacy focused cryptocurrencies exist, using any digital currency in a truly untraceable way is far more difficult than people assume. Long term anonymity is rarely sustained. In real investigations, what usually happens is simple: the trail stays cold until one verifiable link appears, and once it does, the rest of the chain often falls into place.
So the real question is not whether Bitcoin can be tracked — it can — but whether investigators have already identified the one connection that will expose whoever is behind this.
Just something to think about.
Yes, agreed, my Christian relatives call a funeral, a celebration of life. Very common term.Like a New Orleans jazz funeral where they march down the street playing jazz music? Also like an Irish Wake where most everyone gets smashed, tells jokes, and laughs? No disrespect meant.
A celebration of life to me is sometimes the same as a funeral, and other times without an actual deceased person more appropriately called a memorial service.
Well, we don't know that she hasn't at this point in time.Do you really think she wouldn't cave though? After the gravity of the situation became apparent and the scrutiny?
I thought the "this is very valuable to us" was in response to the abductors stating in the message that if they didn't pay, their mothers life must not be of any value to them. I don't know what that 2nd message said so it's just a guess on my part why the valuable phrase was used.I had that thought too. That they now know she is dead and they want to simply bring her home. But the "celebrate with her" seemed to suggest she is still alive. So I concluded the family have received a threat to NG's life and are now resigned to paying whatever amount is being demanded. But then the "this is very valuable to us" is a very odd thing to say about a live person being returned![]()
Kidnapping means alive- murder and body disposal with ransom as a ruse totally different.HUH? Of course it is a kidnaping. The lady is gone. Whereabouts unknown.
Nancy surely has the flexibility to travel far more than the other two, and America loves Moms a whole lot more than siblings and in-laws.There are dozen plus clips of NG visiting SG on Today show and I have seen none of AG or CG visiting Today Show set. Yes, a few public photos of AG with SG and NG but that's it. SG and NG super close relationship. I wonder who was NG's primary caregiver in Tucson as that person will hold lots of info.
It's possible. Hard to pull off, but with help, it would certainly be possible, IMO.Would be interesting if SIL was both- ransomer and kidnapper/murderer and used the ransom only to divert attention away from himself and knew of the traceability, therefore used a wallet not belonging to him in demands.
Amazing. Nothing that we know of or can be told to the likes of 'us'. We will all know only if an arrest is made on either thing. IMOThe ransom demander/demanders sure have been lucky that no other leads have been found in the last 7 days. No arrests, no body, no sign of Nancy.
Sounds like he is a douchebag, but he was the only one I could find livestreaming last night and I was able to watch without having to rely on someone to report what they saw. Like today's reports... silver briefcase taken out of the house??? it sure looked like a table to me, and it was taken in and then taken out by the same deputy. I like to see things for myself lol hate that I had to click on his youtube to watch it though.This JLR YouTuber guy is such a disgusting leach! He has absolutely no scruples and is 100% into every story he "reports" on soley for clicks.
Didn't you say that the search/seize @ AG's house could be because some forensic results came back?Could be connected as they are the ransom demanders OR the ransom demander is just a horrible person that tailgated onto the 'abduction'.. LE has reason for sure to be there. IMO