that post was absurd. Did not read. Too much for this fast moving forum.This will get deleted, but I had to scroll 26 time to read all of this post, while there are notes more compact notes somewhere here. Sorry to be rude, but really.
that post was absurd. Did not read. Too much for this fast moving forum.This will get deleted, but I had to scroll 26 time to read all of this post, while there are notes more compact notes somewhere here. Sorry to be rude, but really.
This doesn't seem to make sense to me - she is appealing to the nation to report anything to law enforcement. Why would they do that if they had a perp in mind?Unless it’s to throw off the perp.
Unless it’s to throw off the perp.
But if she attended services virtually since COVID, none of these things apply. I mean, I guess she could have taught Sunday School online.There is a lot of focus on this call from the church, etc. There could be so many different factors to consider that are likely irrelvant to information the public needs.
She might have had a role in the service (teaching sunday school, greeter, etc.). She may have been responsible for picking someone up - they tried to reach her when she didnt' show and couldn't so they called the church who called her family. She could have had a bestie that was waiting for her as they always do and when she didn't show and she couldn't reach her, called the family knowing that something must be wrong. These things would not follow the timeline of just someone noticing she wasn't there that day.
I don't doubt that the family and investigators would be questioning this if the call from the church wasn't typical or outside of an expected response.
Yes. The first two videos were speaking directly to the "kidnappers" and only them. In this new one she cuts them out completely and appeals to her public for help. Major FU.The past videos seemed to be addressed to the kidnaper/s, we will do what you want, we will pay you, pleading. In this one, she is asking citizens to get out there and help catch those mfers who took her mother. The gloves are off. You can bet the perpetrators didn’t tell her they want more law enforcement involved.
With respect, many of us would be under investigation for suspicious searches. I searched "How long does a body take to become skeletal" yesterday after a discussion about this on WS![]()
I think they would want to make someone feel comfortable if they were getting ready to make an arrest. So the perp doesn't flee or get rid of more evidence, or, if NG is still alive, do something drastic if they feel the walls are closing in. just my guessThis doesn't seem to make sense to me - she is appealing to the nation to report anything to law enforcement. Why would they do that if they had a perp in mind?
I have deleted. I won't do a summary and won't ask for a poll anymoreThis will get deleted, but I had to scroll 26 time to read all of this post, while there are notes more compact notes somewhere here. Sorry to be rude, but really.
That’s certainly possible. What struck me is that I had heard a former LE officer or FBI agent being interviewed and he mentioned the importance of getting exactly the kinds of tips that SG just mentioned. Ex. People acting differently, change of routines etc. I wondered why I hadn’t heard LE making those specific appeals. But SG just did. Smart move.I disagree about misreading tone of former post. They believe something different now...
Savannah was remarkably composed there, and still optimistic that her mom is alive.
Must be an update from LE. LE has the wallet address, but they havent released it to protect integrity
what makes you think they're giving up, genuinely asking?
so few true crime cases are actually high profile, as in known by the general public. that's why they put all those billboards up - the vast majority of people have maybe heard this case in passing or scrolled by it on their social media, if at all. they wouldn't know who nancy is or what she looks like if they saw her at a rest stop. SG is asking people to keep their eyes open.
while they get enough evidence to arrest.why would they need to do that?
It would still be circumstantial evidence.True but, and I'm just going to throw out a random time period, let's say 2 months. So who in the two months before NG was taken, who searched her address. Then you match it up with other queries in the local area and see if the crumbs lead to the same IP address.
I would imagine a specific search of NG home address in December and January would be very rare. Heck, you had neighbors who didn't know she was the mother of a famous news host.
Or a final plea, last ditch effort, to locate the perp and avoid paying the 6M ransom.Unless it’s to throw off the perp.
Quite contrary, IMHO. Something has changed. Seems to me, she has gotten information that the ransom appears to be proven a scam and not related to her mother's disappearance or just as she was about to hit the button on sending $6 million to someone--LE had to let her in on where they are at in the investigation and it's pointing elsewhere like many here have said. She's now in the loop with LE, so to speak.This makes it seem like it wasn't anyone in the family. I don't think SG would make a video like that if she felt they were on the precipice of arresting SIL.
But I truly don't know what to think. I just hope they get a resolution at some point soon. Someone in Tucson must've seen something or know something.![]()
It is odd, almost like the lowercase in particular is a message of sorts?All of SG's social media posts on this have been essentially lowercase no capitalization, which is not her usual style at all. She typically posts like a journalist, not a 20 year old girl being poetic. Probably means nothing, but some covering the case have pointed it out and wondered if it was code, or if we're just looking for stuff now.