- Joined
- Dec 29, 2020
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 29
Lol, I mean disregarding the source, what is the info that DOJ have???No. Not the least bit curious.
Lol, I mean disregarding the source, what is the info that DOJ have???No. Not the least bit curious.
IMO he isn’t privy to anything going on and he is talking off the cuff, which he tends to do. Can’t read more into itWhen the press was asking more about getting new info in the investigation, he said:
“I think we’re doing very well in that regard. You’re probably surprised to hear that,” Trump said. “I think we’re doing very well, meaning we have some clues, I think that are very strong and I think we could have some answers coming up fairly soon.”
Then when asked whether the search for Nancy Guthrie would expand nationwide, Trump explained that he was focused on solving the case. He said:
“I’m not talking about a search, I’m talking about a solution,” he said. “We have some things that I think that we’ll maybe come out reasonably soon from DOJ or FBI or whoever that could be definitive.”
Soooooooo, yeah.... What solution?????
Wonder if AG knows where TC is, now ?If T is involved, I think it is highly likely that A is involved too. She would have said something if he had taken hours to come home after dropping her off, or probably noticed if he left again late at night.
Everybody is different.Good point. Also thinking of my own parents, I don’t think any of their friends have my phone number, and I don’t have theirs. So I’m surprised that a church friend would have any Nancy’s children’s numbers handy to call them.
It was reported on FOX that they had consent warrants.If they didn't have a search warrant than anything they found would likely be barred from evidence at trial.
Will be interesting to see if theres any calls on AG telephone from this mystery person tbhI respectively disagree. The LE doesn't need to have a presser to allow anyone that public opinion has determined is guilty stand and beg for the missing person. The LE needs to concentrate their efforts on reviewing new information and tips, not clearing people in public. There are many other people that could be suspect. What about the mystery church lady? To me this person could be responsible as well, because he/she might have a guilty conscience. I honestly would not want to go and state my innocence because that will only bring out more people that will say he is guilty without any facts. MOO.
The SIL claim was clickbait. Neither the SIL nor AG are involved. If authorities even had a tiny suspicion they were, then they would have search warrants. I know crime stats show there's a connection between last person to see a victim but LEs actions prove they are not suspects at this time.
To be fair I think AG and SG have only been seen in the videos they released. I was hoping MK would ask BE if they'd seen either AG or SG or CG out running around but she didn't.Skipped the country?!
President thought it was an unusual situation and always liked SG. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/t...-missing-mother-calls-it-terrible/ar-AA1VBjKLWhy so much attention from POTUS? So many missing/kidnapped/abducted people.
It is in sync, though, with SG's message on Instagram today.I'm perplexed as to why more billboards are going up if they are closing in and an arrest is imminent.
He's probably staying home out of the spotlight. I am sure he and his wife know all about public suspicions of him and they don't want to fan the flames with a bunch of appearances.Wonder if AG knows where TC is, now ?
Imo.
I wonder who is paying for them? That information might provide some insight. IMOI'm perplexed as to why more billboards are going up if they are closing in and an arrest is imminent.
It's fine to have different opinions about how this is playing out.I respectively disagree. The LE doesn't need to have a presser to allow anyone that public opinion has determined is guilty stand and beg for the missing person. The LE needs to concentrate their efforts on reviewing new information and tips, not clearing people in public. There are many other people that could be suspect. What about the mystery church lady? To me this person could be responsible as well, because he/she might have a guilty conscience. I honestly would not want to go and state my innocence because that will only bring out more people that will say he is guilty without any facts. MOO.
Circle K 5801 N Oracle near Las Lomitas. It is one minute drive from AG house.
I’m sorry if this has been addressed, but if SIL were to be a suspect, what do you think were his movements in theory? Did he drop off NG, leave, and come back around the time the cameras were turned off? Did he drop her off and never actually leave the driveway, lying in wait until she went to bed? Or did he go inside with her? Do you think they maybe had a disagreement on the way home?
I saw the discussion earlier about how people were unhappy we were suspecting family members, and I don’t feel strongly one way or the other, so this is all theoretical.
That's what's depressing. I don't know if I will have anyone left.I don't find it depressing. I hope I have friends that care about me when I get to that age.
No, LE does not need consent of all owners. In fact, it is consent of the legal occupant. For example, if your house was a rental, LE does not need consent of the owner - just consent of the legal occupant or resident. This comes up alot in searches of hotel rooms. The occupant of the hotel room provides consent. Hotels are not legally required to open doors for LE unless there is an urgent need or there is a warrant.Several posters have asked on this thread recently if LE would need both AG and TC to give voluntary consent to a search of their home and property. I assume that LE would need the consent of all legal and official homeowners. Do we know if both AG and TC are listed on auditor's website as both being official homeowners?
The Daily Mail says TC is with AG, SG, etc. The article is paywalled but Megyn Kelly reads the relevant portions in this clip.Wonder if AG knows where TC is, now ?
Imo.