• #19,301
  • #19,302
  • #19,303
Honestly, there is very rarely any ‘nonsense’ on Websleuths, and if there is, it’s pretty short-lived. That’s one of the great things about the site. Members are incredibly thoughtful. This case has been like nothing we’ve ever seen and it is drawing in a lot of nuttiness, imo.
 
  • #19,304
Favor to ask… does anyone have a source that states the camera was broken or removed? I know I read that in multiple articles over the last week but I’m struggling to find one. Googling anything about the camera just brings up the new development.
Just one example I grabbed from the timeline thread:

"At approximately 1:47 a.m. Sunday, the doorbell camera at her home disconnected and authorities do not have it in their possession, he said."

Does not literally say it was broken or removed, but "do not have it in their possession" (along with the pictures of the empty camera bracket, posted many times earlier in this thread; I can post again if truly needed) strongly imply it.

 
  • #19,305
  • #19,306
Are you a troll? They've already explained it can not and is not a COYOTE... RATTLESNAKE etc..... and you persist in these questions.
I discovered the "Ignore" function. Tap their name and then tap Ignore. You are free.
 
  • #19,307
I’ve been attached to the scanners since last week and nothing has been obvious regarding the search even when the “Abduction” and “Manhunt” alerts have gone off. The FlightRadar showed an air unit over both NG and AG’s neighborhoods before heading back north to where it departed from in Phoenix.

Regarding the camera footage - I had to skip about 50 of random discussion - but has anyone mentioned it looks as if he may be wearing shoe covers? The appearance of socks in one can be explained if shoe covers were worn, and it looks as if another image shows laces but then the larger soles. I think it looks like shoe covers. IMO.

I’ve suspected a neighbor for some reason this entire time, but I haven’t posted much on this case because it’s been filled with hundreds of pages of other details being discussed. Is there a group of Websleuth veterans perhaps I could a message group??! Better late than never?

Back the scanners I go and I’ll update in that group if relevant.
 
  • #19,308
Honestly, there is very rarely any ‘nonsense’ on Websleuths, and if there is, it’s pretty short-lived. That’s one of the great things about the site. Members are incredibly thoughtful. This case has been like nothing we’ve ever seen and it is drawing in a lot of nuttiness, imo.
Thanks for this reply, good to know.
 
  • #19,309
Trolls are newbies? At least one of them is.
I hope I wasn't one. I only posted things I thought would benefit (brightned, sharpened, sharing experience in the Medical field, and things not noticed) If so sorry about that!
 
  • #19,310
  • #19,311
That’s a good point. It’s been said on numerous occasions that she didn’t get around easily or similar verbiage. I think a lot of us assumed that maybe she’d use a wheelchair. Perhaps this has been discussed here before, but I haven’t seen it and I do wonder what was meant by it. Did she use a cane? Rollator? Hmmm.
There are photos of her with a cane.
 
  • #19,312
Are you trolling? Do you think the black bear is wearing a ski mask and a strangely holstered gun?
Probably border patrol trolling the Sonoran Desert.
 
  • #19,313
Possibly with a gun on her. Might have been a person in the back, too.
YES, there may be more than one person, we only see the one. And I heard someone say it could be a woman, but they clearly have a mustache, and are large. Looks like man to me. Why did it take so long to post this video?? Seems like someone could absolutely ID this person from eyes, mouth, and clothing. I do not believe this is a woman?

OMGosh, I just went back and looked again. I see now, why they say it is a woman. Look at the eyebrows and eyelashes? Looks like a woman, IDK??
 
  • #19,314
  • #19,315
Honestly, there is very rarely any ‘nonsense’ on Websleuths, and if there is, it’s pretty short-lived. That’s one of the great things about the site. Members are incredibly thoughtful. This case has been like nothing we’ve ever seen and it is drawing in a lot of nuttiness, imo.
And the inability to read posts, read articles linked in posts and the ability to think logically. The coyote post has sent me over the edge.
 
  • #19,316
Just one example I grabbed from the timeline thread:

"At approximately 1:47 a.m. Sunday, the doorbell camera at her home disconnected and authorities do not have it in their possession, he said."

Does not literally say it was broken or removed, but "do not have it in their possession" (along with the pictures of the empty camera bracket, posted many times earlier in this thread; I can post again if truly needed) strongly imply it.

I should have gone there first. Thank you so much!!
 
  • #19,317
We are going to discuss the terrifying video released today in the kidnapping of Nancy Guthrie
Click on the video tonight at 10:30 PM Eastern and join us please

 
  • #19,318
Can you provide the source for your information?

Not OP, but...

AZ Central article from 2/5 saying it...

Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Kash Patel is heading to Arizona in the near future, though the visit appeared to have been scheduled before the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie.

FBI Special Agent Heith Janke confirmed during a Feb. 5 news conference that Patel had plans to visit the state.

 
  • #19,319
I hope I wasn't one. I only posted things I thought would benefit (brightned, sharpened, sharing experience in the Medical field, and things not noticed) If so sorry about that!
I don’t think anyone was referring to you.
Looked back at your posts and they’re not at all what I think people are complaining about.
 
  • #19,320
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
258
Guests online
3,405
Total visitors
3,663

Forum statistics

Threads
644,194
Messages
18,812,665
Members
245,319
Latest member
Atinygirl
Top