Yes, I suspect he pistol whipped her. In her fragile health, it likely killed her, or she passed shortly thereafter.I am wondering why people are so obsessed with the inside of the home? NG, JMHO, certainly didn't conveniently start bleeding as soon as she got outside. IMO, there would be plenty of blood or at least SOME BLOOD in the home. SHE WAS ABDUCTED and likely put up a struggle or was immediately subdued by the perp. Further speculation on my part is that family arrived at her home, saw blood outside and some blood inside with some other oddities like watch etc being there, searched inside to be sure she hadn't collapsed anywhere indoors, ( blood loss from blood thinners as a contributing factor), and notified the police. The better question is why wouldn't there be blood inside? I am confident there was...JMO
Same. I have wealthy siblings and I don't resent that. I'm proud that they're so successful.
As I've said since the beginning, if this was a money grab from family her going missing is the worst way for them to do it as the estate will be tied up for years.
She is 84 with limited mobility, if they wanted the inheritance early there are a million easier way to do that which wouldn't include a nationwide viral story with their every move under scrutiny.
Why do people keep thinking that murder for inheritance can only be about getting it early?!
It's more often to prevent you being cut out of inheritance altogether.
I thought it did appear to have some pilling near or around the sleeve.in the actual video, the jacket looks fuzzy to me- like fleece. Is that just blur from the camera or real?
Definite pistol whip vibes.Yes, I suspect he pistol whipped her. In her fragile health, it likely killed her, or she passed shortly thereafter.
Amateur opinion and speculation only
Agree. For them to immediately determine it was a crime scene, there had to have been a fair amount of blood and a fairly significantly disturbed scene. MOIt is certainly possible that vomit or urine is a DNA source from the home, but it is less likely that either would be used as a basis to infer that a serious crime had been committed against an elderly 84 year old lady living alone. In my view only her absence, a disturbed scene, and a significant amount of blood would create the conditions where that would be surmised as quickly as it was, and homicide being brought in to confer.
JMO.
She was a little old lady and there was a man with a gun. IMO there only needed to be 1 and I'm not sure how three kidnappers was decided?I just feel so vibey on this being an organized event where Nancy walked into a trap. she may not have even been dropped off alive/ conscious. they could have brought her back into the house through the garage and out the front door etc all for staging purposes. they could have easily drugged her and gotten rid of her. I don't believe in a stranger intruder theory at all.
I don't believe he could take her out of there without help unless he literally dragged her to his partially hidden car..so he has accomplices...nothing is stolen..no robbery has occurred. there is no sexual motive with two to three accomplices,
so, the motive is money....yet hmmm, they don't seem to have kept the victim alive...so now we have three kidnappers with a dead victim, so now what?
if I had to guess I'd say someone incentivized this mess and it's a murder for hire. mOO
Plus if one of them wasn't there, that individual could have left devices at their house. Not sure if their vehicle movements can be tracked.Good point. I was thinking that if their alibis are each other saying that they were home sleeping, LE can't rule them out, because the source could be covering for the other (or both involved).
Given the recent events, I am leaning much farther away from family involvement. JMO.
I assumed her own securityPerhaps he meant colleagues, political friends, attorney, etc.
If I was a hired hit then why would they take the body? Makes no sense. Typical hits don’t require more than one person and the sole purpose is to kill as quick as possible. The longer it takes, the more people there, moving the body or person alive, all is more of a chance for being caught.I just feel so vibey on this being an organized event where Nancy walked into a trap. she may not have even been dropped off alive/ conscious. they could have brought her back into the house through the garage and out the front door etc all for staging purposes. they could have easily drugged her and gotten rid of her. I don't believe in a stranger intruder theory at all.
I don't believe he could take her out of there without help unless he literally dragged her to his partially hidden car..so he has accomplices...nothing is stolen..no robbery has occurred. there is no sexual motive with two to three accomplices,
so, the motive is money....yet hmmm, they don't seem to have kept the victim alive...so now we have three kidnappers with a dead victim, so now what?
if I had to guess I'd say someone incentivized this mess and it's a murder for hire. mOO
Use it like a metal detector? BrilliantThis may be a stupid question but here it is: Does the FBI have the capability to clone the encrypted Bluetooth specific pacemaker information to other phones? If so, if any phone synced to NG’s pacemaker she would have to be within 50’ alive or otherwise correct? A pacemaker battery has charge for 7-10yrs and continues until removed. 50’ isn’t a very big area but could be helpful. Idk just a thought.
Doesn’t have to be ex-military. Whenever I visited my aunt, who also was living at the time in 55+ gated community south of Tucson, she had no hesitancy to show me her gun stashed away in her purse whenever we went out…dinner, shopping, sightseeing. And she’s no spring chicken, but definitely knew how to use it. I confess to wondering if NG herself had a gun somewhere at home. Never heard mention of one. JMOSnipped/BBM
This is exactly why I think her attacker/abductor knew who he was going after.
I live in an Arizona 55+ community with a high percentage of ex-military residents and I'm fairly certain that many of them would come to the door armed and ready.
I just watched a news outlet yesterday who researched the range, and it's only 10-30 feet, but I really wish it were greater, because this is a great idea I've seen bounced around!This may be a stupid question but here it is: Does the FBI have the capability to clone the encrypted Bluetooth specific pacemaker information to other phones? If so, if any phone synced to NG’s pacemaker she would have to be within 50’ alive or otherwise correct? A pacemaker battery has charge for 7-10yrs and continues until removed. 50’ isn’t a very big area but could be helpful. Idk just a thought.
Not another scammed?TMZ Receives Third Email in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping, Demanding Higher Reward
TMZ Receives Third Email in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping, Demanding Higher Reward
very good ideaThis may be a stupid question but here it is: Does the FBI have the capability to clone the encrypted Bluetooth specific pacemaker information to other phones? If so, if any phone synced to NG’s pacemaker she would have to be within 50’ alive or otherwise correct? A pacemaker battery has charge for 7-10yrs and continues until removed. 50’ isn’t a very big area but could be helpful. Idk just a thought.