- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
- Messages
- 428
- Reaction score
- 3,654
Walmart always get them!They check way past a 100 mile radius. They check entire database systems. They specifically have superior access to data.
Walmart always get them!They check way past a 100 mile radius. They check entire database systems. They specifically have superior access to data.
The article quoting an insider states they were strategically able to smash the cameras before the motion detected them and streamed or saved etc. and so if they’re smashed now no one can check remotely - if true.One would think. But that's also an assumption. After a while you stop checking in, you start ignoring push alerts. The subscription wasn't on the external cams. Why wasn't that paid, probably a lapse or oversight.
We don't know. At this point I am most interested in the inside of the crime scene, the situation with any alarm or other interior security, the supposed signs of forced entry that we are not clear about, and all that.
In the CNN interview with Sheriff Nanos, he states that there were multiple cameras in Nancy's house and data/video is trying to be retrieved from them.
Sheriff in Guthrie case: ‘we have DNA,’ ‘don’t know whose it is’ | CNN
Your posted link didn't work but I think separating the text like I've done here will make it functional.
I have a pool and live in a warmer climate in CA. I think the pool was ruled out and they allowed the cleaners to do their job with LE supervision. Pools are a pain to take care of and can quickly get filled with algae from debris. Maintaining chemicals is important and it’s costly if they aren’t maintained properly and consistently. I don’t think it’s a big deal for the pool cleaners to do the outside job they were contracted to do. JMO.I don't have a pool. Could the pool cleaner vacuumed the bottom of the pool for evidence?
JMO as I don't know.
It implies he believes she is deceased, which unfortunately I think is very likely the case, but yeah, it is incredibly insensitive to declare that publicly.I want to make a comment that is MY option only. Mods, feel free to delete if you think i am out of line.
When I saw the statement from the sheriff saying Nancy might not be found “for years”it made my blood boil. Nancy doesn’t have years!!!
Some people are just insane. i mean, who would say that? if i came up missing at my age and i thought the sheriff said that about me and then said he was exhausted I would think he has given up. If I could do so right now, I would grab him by the ear and make him squeal. The nerve of that man!
Opinion of "sources close to the case believe." It's clickbait, IMO, from RadarOnline republished by AOL. The headline and opening sentence call in a theory. It doesn't provide context for insiders' relationship to the victims or investigation, so it's difficult to weigh the opinions.source or opinion?
Same here. This is just an opinion, so far*, but I there are potentially good reasons to believe that the detailed searches were useful. I was disappointed and surprised by the early news today, talking only about people being released without arrest. Later wording was more nuanced, though.I don’t believe there is nothing to show for last nights raids yet.
Have not heard a peep official or otherwise that robbery was also involved. I agree. It’s perplexing and the ransoms did not make sense.I don’t know. Your theory’s motive is money? That supposed ransom came much later and it didn’t make sense. Ransoms are delivered immediately to the family. They tell them not to contact authorities or they’ll hurt their loved one. Who sends a ransom to the media immediately alerting authorities? On top of that, who writes that you’ll never hear from them, the perp or perps, again?
If this was a gang initiation, you don’t take a body with you.
Did they ever confirm that nothing was stolen from the house? Have they ruled out robbery?
I want to make a comment that is MY option only. Mods, feel free to delete if you think i am out of line.
When I saw the statement from the sheriff saying Nancy might not be found “for years”it made my blood boil. Nancy doesn’t have years!!!
Some people are just insane. i mean, who would say that? if i came up missing at my age and i thought the sheriff said that about me and then said he was exhausted I would think he has given up. If I could do so right now, I would grab him by the ear and make him squeal. The nerve of that man!
Yes, this sheriff is a walking, talking, gaffe-machine.I want to make a comment that is MY option only. Mods, feel free to delete if you think i am out of line.
When I saw the statement from the sheriff saying Nancy might not be found “for years”it made my blood boil. Nancy doesn’t have years!!!
Some people are just insane. i mean, who would say that? if i came up missing at my age and i thought the sheriff said that about me and then said he was exhausted I would think he has given up. If I could do so right now, I would grab him by the ear and make him squeal. The nerve of that man!
Sure but they'll capture him approaching the cameras and smashing them and send a person detected motion to their phones before he can disable them (JUST like it did with the Nest cam outside at the front door).The article quoting an insider states they were strategically able to smash the cameras before the motion detected them and streamed or saved etc. and so if they’re smashed now no one can check remotely - if true.
there has to be a second camera somewhere for it to have detected the motion that the Sheriff referenced after the front door camera was removed,Your posted link didn't work but I think separating the text like I've done here will make it functional.
I saw the Sheriff nod when Ed Lavandera asked about "other cameras in the house" but my sense of the phrasing of the question and the Sheriff's intentionally vague response is that we don't know for sure if the additional cameras are IN the house or AT the house (meaning they could be additional exterior cameras). It was clear to me that there are more cameras than the front door one, and that Google is trying to extract video from the other(s). But specifically whether they were indoors or in the back yard or back door or what, wasn't definitively made clear as I interpret it. MOO
one of the major factors for me not seeing this as a targeted kidnapping is you would want to keep NG alive and comfortable in order to get your ransom, if targeted you would know what medications she took and you would have taken them with her, would have taken her hearing aids (I haven't heard anything from LE confirming if they were taken with her or left behind),
by not taking her medications you are at risk of her health declining and she may die without her medications, we do not know exactly what she took and how important it was to keep her alive,
No it doesnt. it doesnt say the FBI TOOK THE LEAD. THEY CAN use their resources when applicable, However. If you can find anywhere that is says the FBI has taken the lead, please advise. moo
Apologies, I read it as your own words!The article states that .. not me lol. She never collected her own mail either, she had to have help. It points out that her mobility was indeed quite limited. I have had 5 femur surgeries and I can still walked to the mailbox. I just wonder exactly what limited her mobility to the point she could barely walk. Osteoporosis I have but it's treated with infusions, back issues I know are mobility limiting issues.
Has anyone read an articles that stated exactly what her mobility issues were from? age related, a fall, surgeries, etc.
I have not found one yet
I believe most of those statements were taken from articles quoting her family and friends.I have seen quite a few posts through this thread commenting on Nancy’s personality - she was sharp as a tack, she is a feisty lady, nobody’s fool type comments and what a wonderful, lovely person she is. We don’t actually know what she is like as a person, I just find it a bit odd a whole personality is being made up.
Respectfully, LE do not owe the public any kind of explanation. We have no idea what they are working off of or what led them to treat the situation Friday like they did, nor should we.They really need to explain themselves , the train of thought they are on, because its making them look incompetent
same
The Apple watch which NG had, has fall protection. It works well and is reliable. JMOIt was reported strategically for purposes of knowing if she has fallen. Not for security but would know if she fell. I wouldn’t necessarily presume bathroom even though that is a high fall place. I do not have 1 in the bathroom for 90yo mother but more aimed at spaces on floor she might fall. Similar to what’s described.