The 3 biggest challenges as the Nancy Guthrie case stretches into week 3
I’ve been wondering about those marks too. My first thought was that it looks like the pattern from trainers. And maybe it is.I think he did walk through the blood because I see repeat square patterns that look like transfer from the sole of a sneaker.
View attachment 645504
cropped section from the full image below
View attachment 645505
It wouldn't have to be the same part of an object landing in blood twice, transfer is a wet substance (ie blood) getting on the object once (ie stepping on a blood droplet) and then leaving the same markings on the surface as it moves, like a foot taking steps, or in your example a cane.I’ve been wondering about those marks too. My first thought was that it looks like the pattern from trainers. And maybe it is.
But what is a little strange is that we see the exact same pattern twice (at least). What are the chances the exact same part of a shoe landed in a blood droplet?
Could it be something else, like part of a cane tip? I haven’t a clue what kind of cane Nancy has, so take this with a huge grain of salt. (My photo example here is if quite a… robust cane tip.)
BingoI posted this last night. LE should potentially be able tie the glove to the Guthrie residence through plant DNA. The glove in question , if used by the perp, should be loaded with lantana plant DNA .
This is exactly what happened in my opinion. There are several factors supporting that theory![]()
Nancy Guthrie's Kidnapping May Have Been a Botched Burglary: Report
There’s a major new development in the Nancy Guthrie case ... authorities now reportedly believe her kidnapping may have stemmed from a burglary gone wrong.www.tmz.com
(If someone posted this previously, my apologies for repeating. I did try to look through last 3 pages & didn’t see it yet.)
Absolutely. That’s probably what it is. I only mentioned the possibility because the marks look to be of similar… I’m not sure how to say it… intensity? One doesn’t look particularly weaker than the other. It’s so hard to tell from the photo.It wouldn't have to be the same part of an object landing in blood twice, transfer is a wet substance (ie blood) getting on the object once (ie stepping on a blood droplet) and then leaving the same markings on the surface as it moves, like a foot taking steps, or in your example a cane.
MOO
Been reading all the theories in here and I have a couple thoughts. First, I think SG’s latest video, she is talking to the person who wanted one bitcoin for the information he had on the person who had something to do with this. SG say u are not alone. We are here indicating they will help him if he comes to them. Also I think it’s revenge and might not be on SG. 51 mins in the house? Were they interrogating her to see what she knew about something and got hurt cause it didn’t go well? this is all My Opinion OnlyJust caught up on Savannahs new video - I felt that video was much more personal than other videos - almost like she thinks she may know the person who abducted her mother MOO
Agree, and this is why I think authorities erred in not encouraging SG to do more frequent videos from Day One.I think LE perhaps believes that the abduction was more about her then her mother. The abductor is seeking her attention.
NG had posted political opinions on her Facebook page. I don't actually think it was politically motivated, but it is one theory. We know so little. JMOHow can this have been "politically motivated"?
Celebrity based wealth could be more public and thus easier to recognize than other bases for wealth.
In the end, the daughter's position as a host of The Today show made her far more visible and recognizable than other wealthy people in both name and appearance. Though the crime targeted the mother, the daughterr's daily visibility could have made the link easier to recognize and to confirm.