Wondering - if the glove belongs to the person on the video, if he threw it out the window of a moving car, what side of the road was it on? Would it be a driver side or passenger side? If passenger side, maybe indicates a second person that drove.
I find this pathetic. JMO. What does a poor family do? Since everyone here feels so sorry for all involved, I would guess you are all contributing? Of course not. The 100k in one of the bitcoin ransom notes is totally manageable for an upper middle class family, not withstanding SG is worth considerably more. In the final analysis, this is a FAMILY dilemma. Take out a 100k mortgage. IF NG is dead, one way of the other, you will get your money back. ( even if it means filing a claim against her estate. JMOA go fund me was form by a man in Arizona to help raise funds for the Bitcoin. I think we all saw that coming. Since I don’t want to bring attention to it, please just Google the information to get the article and see the page.
IMO, in their communication with the public and sometimes through trusted news people. LE and FBI are intentionally using language designed to frighten the perpetrator and get him to panic and make a mistake. For example, they likely are surveilling cell phones and the perp might make an only-when-frightened type phone call that could be revealing and helpful to build a case against him. Or, the perp might drive somewhere revealing or do something else that could allow LE to garner more information and evidence against him. JMOI think I read earlier in this thread that LE has stated without question that this is not a case of burglary gone wrong. That is unfortunate, because that is exactly what it looks like. In doing this they may be focusing on DNA of an alleged perpetrator and all the time it takes to get it, rather than the location of a medically compromised 84 yr. old woman, who must be in dire straits physically at this point.
I hope this is just a cover up ruse by police and they are actually examining the burglary aspect, or precious time will be wasted.
If this was a bungled burglary by a non-professional, he will have panicked and likely separated himself from her as quickly as possible. I hope there are search teams combing the desert with drones, FLIR, and SAR teams.
I believe there was a report yesterday saying that the glove that has been sent for testing is NOT the glove that was photographed at the side of the roadWondering - if the glove belongs to the person on the video, if he threw it out the window of a moving car, what side of the road was it on? Would it be a driver side or passenger side? If passenger side, maybe indicates a second person that drove.
Excellent point. MOOWondering - if the glove belongs to the person on the video, if he threw it out the window of a moving car, what side of the road was it on? Would it be a driver side or passenger side? If passenger side, maybe indicates a second person that drove.
She says "we believe" several times, but she doesn't say we believe Mom is alive. The "we believe" is about the decency of everyone and that they CAN do the right thing. ....by divulging NG's whereabouts. JMO"Just do the next right thing" common phrase, song, used when someone is overwhelmed or in DEEP
IMHO, any disposable glove which has been worn by someone is likely to have DNA on it--even if worn by someone experienced in aseptic technique.
Therefore a commonly available glove that is "similar" to the one worn by the video-perp, which was found almost 2 miles from the crime scene, is likely to have DNA on it and unlikely to have anything to do with the crime--IMHO.
That's NOT to say that it shouldn't have been collected and tested; it just feels like people and the media are hanging their hopes on "this is going to break the case" when in reality it has a miniscule chance of being significant to this investigation, IMHO.
I truly want the test results to be significant and case-breaking.
All good points and possibilities. I agree with the dynamic you describe south of the border. I also agree with your conclusions stemming from that.All IMHO
Just a possibility that I can imagine happening.
I think this was a planned kidnapping of Nancy based on her daughter Savannah’s notoriety and wealth. A minimum of two people were at her home for the actual abduction but others were involved and waiting for the hostage to be delivered.
I think that Nancy put up a fight in order to not be removed from her home- hence an injury that dripped blood when they carried her out the front door. Possibly an injury to her nose.
I think Nancy was ferried across the border in a van or small truck before anyone knew she was missing.
I don’t think they took her through the heavy cameras at Nogales though but further afield near Naco or Agua Prieta.
She was taken to a rural ranch as pre-planned and ransom notes were sent to the sheriff/ law enforcement with no public acknowledgement before being sent to TMZ and local TV stations in Tucson.
I think the ransom notes via email asking for around six million dollars in cryptocurrency were the legitimate notes from Nancy’s kidnappers.
I think there was at least one designated female “care taker” waiting for Nancy to be delivered at the ranch.
It is very easy to find young “elder care” help across the border and I think that there were one or two young “nurses” in place awaiting Nancy’s arrival.
I do think they were able to keep Nancy alive for the first week of her capture- hopeful that the ransom money would be delivered. If they needed meds for her those were easily obtained in Mexico.
If leaked deadlines from the first two notes are to be believed, the second deadline of Monday passed exactly one week ago. I doubt that Nancy’s captors have faith that any money will be sent to them at this point so I sadly believed that they removed Nancy from the ranch last week and disposed of her somewhere in the dessert. The chances of ever finding her body are slim to none. They may have disposed of the nurses as collateral damage too.
The chances of ever finding her captors are slim as well. I don’t think they found any black gloves that were related to this kidnapping. The continued searches were for a so-to-speak off-chance K Bar knife sheath (or any little piece of DNA inadvertently left at the scene)
The tent set up was to cover media eyes when they re-checked Nancy’s front porch for DNA.
I truly hope they found some trace DNA from the captors and I hope they are able to find them and prosecute them. While I’m not optimistic that Nancy is still alive, I am still hopeful for a great miracle.
I don’t think anyone has ever suggested the doorbell reconnected after it was removed. LE also never stated they have the doorbell or sent it anywhere either. The video footage of the perp was recovered from Google servers so it had to have been uploaded prior. Even if you don’t have an active subscription, video events and notification data are sent to the server. Up to three hours worth of rolling data might be kept briefly depending on the free plan the hardware was associated with.Just because it was recovered from Google's servers does not mean that it reconnected at NG's house. The camera may have been badly damaged by the suspect, including it's Wi-Fi connection hardware, and then was sent off to Google to see if they could find a way to "reconnect" it or transfer the data from the camera's internal buffer. Google personnel may have been the ones who reconnected it for the transfer of data to their servers.
Cops pay informants ALL THE TIME! Ever hear the term "paid informant"? Family needs to pay the money. JMOI can understand the legalities surrounding the reward money and its' inability to be used towards this most presumably hoax letter. I do wonder if there is a legal reason prohibiting the G family or anyone else from paying the same dollar amount to this person who is clearly committing a crime by asking for it in exchange for information.
FYI: As I recall, the murderer in Laura's case was a homeless man who had taken up residence in the parking lot of a church (lived in his car), a block or two from the home where she lived with her mother. He was "off" in some way, either mentally ill or compromised intelligence but Laura's mom had been hiring him to do yard work.I've said it before and I'll say it again, the case this one reminds me most of is that of Laura Houghteling. And that was a homicide. I think NG was killed in her home, and the body removed for some reason by the killer, probably to remove evidence on her body and buy time.
I don't know about motivation, but it doesn't appear to be theft, at least not of items from the home. It could have a sexual component; Bundy did similar home invasions where he took the victim with him.
I don't think any of the ransom demands are from the kidnapper; I think they are the work of opportunists. A genuine ransom demand would have come in immediately, not hours or days later.
MOO
Or, that FBI experts on kidnapping and hostage negotiation told SG exactly what to say to get the best response from the kidnapper. Saying "just do the next right thing" to the perpetrator might give them confidence that SG believes in their goodness, that this was all a terrible mistake and he really is a good guy who usually does the right thing."Just do the next right thing" common phrase, song, used when someone is overwhelmed or in DEEP
Hmmmm indeed."Them" "Mexico" Author of today's note/letter has a record of burglary from 10 years ago. Hmmmmm
The family are willing to pay, but they want 'Proof of Life', none has been provided, in fact it sounds like communications have 'broken' down. You have to 'fear' the worse.Cops pay informants ALL THE TIME! Ever hear the term "paid informant"? Family needs to pay the money. JMO