• #32,281
To outright clear the family as suspects suggests to me they know who did this.

I don’t think you can clear anybody fully unless you have a clear suspect(s)
 
  • #32,282
Check out what’s posted on media thread?
I must be blind as a bat. I have looked everywhere, including at every post in the media, maps, timelin threat for this case and have yet to fine a list of approved sources.
 
  • #32,283
To outright clear the family as suspects suggests to me they know who did this.

I don’t think you can clear anybody fully unless you have a clear suspect(s)
not even if you've gone over their alibis and found hard proof they were elsewhere at the time, and gone over their phone, email, etc. ("cooperated fully") and found no fishy communications with anyone?
 
  • #32,284
This is a state crime. How would the DOJ request max penalty.

We don’t have all the facts. This very well could be a federal offense.

IMO
 
  • #32,285
not even if you've gone over their alibis and found hard proof they were elsewhere at the time, and gone over their phone, email, etc. ("cooperated fully") and found no fishy communications with anyone?
It doesn't feel like a coincidence that all of this new information is coming out so rapidly. I feel like in this case they might know.
 
  • #32,286
yeah i'm thinking they must have. in the very first video, i like everyone else found it a little odd to reference Silence of the Lambs but thought maybe that's what the FBI advises to say.

but this is too coincidental now.

moo
I think this is quite possible. But why would the kidnapper give this kind of direction?
 
  • #32,287
  • #32,288
Agreed. At this point they're not going to get it. Either Nancy has already passed or whoever has her fears a photo will be able to be tracked. And if God forbid Nancy is dead, don't they still want to know where her remains are and bring the perpetrators to justice? Pay the money. They don't have to make a big show of it or announce it. Do it discreetly and see what happens. Threaten charges on Blabby Levin if he makes it public. If the FBI doesn't get a hit on that DNA they're back to square one. The only way this case will be solved is if someone with knowledge comes forward, and LE is going to have to make that worth their while.
I'm sick of the ransom note writer(s) toying with this family. It seems like they've only given a bunch of bs in an attempt to extort this family. I don't believe they have any useful information. MOO
Curious. I realize lots of people go thru their garage vs front door when they come home, but looking at where the driveway is to the front door vs to the garage (having to back out), wouldn't it be more practical (for SIL and her) to have gone thru the front when dropped off? Must have been a normal routine. On the other hand, the opener conveniently made a record of when she was dropped off. Again, there could be a great explaination, but I do question it.
I thought the bedroom perhaps was located on this side of the home, but have some seen a few posts suggesting it was not. As far as letting her out at the garage, I'm sure the car would have been pulled up in such a manor NG could get out and walk in, without having to walk around car doors etc. I could also envision the garage door not being let up until she was ready to walk in and it being closed as soon as she unlocked the interior door to the house. Doable in two minutes. MOO.
Something I've been think about randomly. There's no reports of drag marks away from either door, the floor possibly looks gritty enough for there to be something? If she was carried that means the person would need to be fairly strong, or possibly two perps. Just a thought
Someone posted quite a while back a trial in the dirt, showing parallel tracks. It is unknown if these tracks were made prior to her disappearance. Some suggested they could have come from a safe, garden tool carrier, deer transporter, or even a police evidence cart...with 2 and 3 being a way to transport her body. MOO
Didn't the Sheriff say in one interview that he could not clear the family until they had the DNA results back. I am saying in my opinion as I don't have a link.
He did. And now he has finally said the family is cleared. I don't think we have to know how they were cleared, just that they have been. MOO
 
  • #32,289
not even if you've gone over their alibis and found hard proof they were elsewhere at the time, and gone over their phone, email, etc. ("cooperated fully") and found no fishy communications with anyone?
I still don’t think you ‘fully clear them’ unless you have a suspect - they were after all the last ones to see Nancy. Fully clearing them is pretty definite!

I think if you didn’t have a suspect you may use the phrase ‘at this stage we have no reason to suspect any of the family’

I am very happy they’ve been cleared though it must’ve been absolute hell for the son in law
 
  • #32,290
I still don’t think you ‘fully clear them’ unless you have a suspect - they were after all the last ones to see Nancy. Fully clearing them is pretty definite!

I think if you didn’t have a suspect you may use the phrase ‘at this stage we have no reason to suspect any of the family’

I am very happy they’ve been cleared though it must’ve been absolute hell for the son in law
fair enough
 
  • #32,291
Last edited:
  • #32,292
I think this is quite possible. But why would the kidnapper give this kind of direction?
wonder if it was a sort of test like "how well do they follow directions and how serious are they taking this?"
or maybe i'm giving too much credit and they did it just to be a clown

moo
 
  • #32,293
not even if you've gone over their alibis and found hard proof they were elsewhere at the time, and gone over their phone, email, etc. ("cooperated fully") and found no fishy communications with anyone?
Agree! If you are cleared, that should not have to be 'backed up' by locating a solid suspect elsewhere.
 
  • #32,294
TMZ should really be saying, 'we aren't middle men, speak to the FBI'. That is the smart thing to do. The 'kind' thing to do is to pass any information that they may have to the FBI, if it leads to an arrest they get the $100,000 reward.
 
  • #32,295
I noticed this just now. Look at his droopy upper eyelids. They look to be almost covering his upper lashes. I thought he was quite young at first till I noticed this.
IMG_0119.webp
 
  • #32,296
Only my guess, but I’m guessing they had a theory and things are starting to comeback from labs and click in place. I’m hoping today will be some action and resolution.
 
  • #32,297
I noticed this just now. Look at his droopy upper eyelids. They look to be almost covering his upper lashes. I thought he was quite young at first till I noticed this. View attachment 645655
That's why we discussed him having on two masks. I believe this is a young man.
 
  • #32,298
Do many layers of clothing keep a stun gun from penetrating?
 
  • #32,299
Seems like there might be a connection? Unverified claims allege that a woman identified as K — described in some posts as a niece of NG — was connected to a gray Range Rover seized by authorities during a late-night operation near the missing woman's home. The same claims have named L as the vehicle's owner and as a person of interest.
<Modsnip to remove full names>
There’s an awful lot going on and I hope it comes to something. It’s hard to tell if people are seeing connections where there are none. The research is more easily and accurately done by LE than by regular people and if there’s anything to the claims, we’ll know soon.
 
  • #32,300
I noticed this just now. Look at his droopy upper eyelids. They look to be almost covering his upper lashes. I thought he was quite young at first till I noticed this. View attachment 645655
I think he’s wearing another mask under the balaclava.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
409
Guests online
3,484
Total visitors
3,893

Forum statistics

Threads
642,658
Messages
18,788,120
Members
244,989
Latest member
trulynobody
Back
Top