- Joined
- Aug 18, 2019
- Messages
- 1,198
- Reaction score
- 14,050
Nope.I wonder if the the DNA on the gloves match the DNA found in the house?
Nope.I wonder if the the DNA on the gloves match the DNA found in the house?
I think DNA found in the home did not match anyone in CODIS.Investigative genealogy on the DNA from the recovered glove? But didn’t the DNA from glove not match the DNA found in the home? They are more certain of the glove as source than the DNA found in home?
IMO it's a dead end since there is no DNA match.No bond listed is telling. I think maybe putting the pressure on this one while getting ducks in a row. Unfortunately, it doesn't mean Nancy is found or safe.
@MassGuyI’m not surprised
Hopefully they are pursuing IGG on the DNA from inside the house.I think DNA found in the home did not match anyone in CODIS.
I think DNA in the 2 miles away globe did not match anyone in CODIS.
I believe the DNA found on home items is not the same as the DNA found on the 2 miles away glove.
If they figure out whose DNA is on the 2 miles away glove, I'm not sure how helpful that is without a link from the glove to the crime. It's probably some random person.
Say the DNA on a commonly used glove on the side of the road matched a POI or the inside of the house.I think DNA found in the home did not match anyone in CODIS.
I think DNA in the 2 miles away globe did not match anyone in CODIS.
I believe the DNA found on home items is not the same as the DNA found on the 2 miles away glove.
If they figure out whose DNA is on the 2 miles away glove, I'm not sure how helpful that is without a link from the glove to the crime. It's probably some random person.
MOO I don't believe it was a stalker of SG,but I do believe that the person or persons saw an opportunity when they found out a wealthy woman was alone overnight in this exclusive neighborhood.I would like to also ask how often the stalker kidnaps or even harms a family member to get attention. Are there any examples that we can go off of? Don't the obsessed usually go directly for the person they are obsessed with? And, you are correct, there usually is a ton of attempts to get they're attention before they do something like this. I would assume that the FBI and criminal profilers have thought of this already, I certainly hope so anyways.
I wouldn't even put a toy gun in that thing. LOLMy guess would be the craptastic holster. No one who appreciates a gun would own one of those, IMHO.
I wondered about that but I don't think that was the only connection or there would not have been Probable Cause in relation to Friday.IMO it's a dead end since there is no DNA match.
Probably arrested for an outstanding warrant from a previous case. MOOThe arrest I see is not for this year even. So its not linked at all. Unless I dont see something.
It may not pick up cars traveling along right side of driveway to garage. Or the getaway car came when NG was bringing removed and camera was removed.If that's the case then it also wouldn't record the perp pulling car around driveway to garage to hide until they were ready to use it to remove NG out the front door.
Agreed. I legit cannot understand why it's being discussed by LE publicly. Two mile glove is absurd.Say the DNA on a commonly used glove on the side of the road matched a POI or the inside of the house.
It is conceivable or possible that a worker that was in the house discarded the glove after he left. (came in house to use bathroom, discuss the job, collect payment). It is conceivable a POI that lived in the area also just detailed their Range Rover and discarded the glove. W/o Nancy's blood/DNA on the glove there is still no connection to the crime scene at all. So these gloves on the side of a road are a long shot to begin with, with no chain of custody, and being common contractor trash.
Unlikely, but they could be bluffing... JMO.Are you surprised that it was revealed to the general public so quickly, that there was no CODIS match?
I would like to also ask how often the stalker kidnaps or even harms a family member to get attention. Are there any examples that we can go off of? Don't the obsessed usually go directly for the person they are obsessed with? And, you are correct, there usually is a ton of attempts to get they're attention before they do something like this. I would assume that the FBI and criminal profilers have thought of this already, I certainly hope so anyways.
His message to "suspects"? Do they have suspects?
At least from Ancestry, it would take a court order.I wonder the protocol to utilize genealogical dna from ancestry, 23andMe, etc?!
My guess would be the craptastic holster. No one who appreciates a gun would own one of those, IMHO.