- Joined
- Oct 13, 2009
- Messages
- 5,377
- Reaction score
- 45,531
If this guy keeps sending notes maybe LE will eventually get a location for him.JMOO
If this guy keeps sending notes maybe LE will eventually get a location for him.JMOO
Ok thanks. It's very possible these two things got conflated. Some have been linking the gun shop owner video as the source for the "40 names" but as you see in the video he did not say that at all.I’d read/heard the 40 names claim a good few hours before the interview was posted. Ithink maybe each gun shop didn’t get shown all 40, but a different selection of about 20, each including the one or two people they’re actually looking for.
JMO
Maybe this was said deliberately . I really cannot believe that the FBI are not directly involved in what is and what isn't broadcast about the ransom notes received.
The sheriff said it.
Post in thread 'Nancy Guthrie, 84, missing - last seen in the Catalina foothills area on Jan 31, 2026 - MEDIA, MAPS, TIMELINE thread *NO DISCUSSION*' Nancy Guthrie, 84, missing - last seen in the Catalina foothills area on Jan 31, 2026 - MEDIA, MAPS, TIMELINE thread *NO DISCUSSION*
Sean says "alleged" ransom letters. Is he starting to doubt TMZ's credibility???.
Maybe this was said deliberately . I really cannot believe that the FBI are not directly involved in what is and what isn't broadcast about the ransom notes received.
I believe the Sheriff said the neighbor called APS after NG was already missing, but don't know if that makes sense.I find the timeline of this weird. Like surely the neighbor wouldn’t have called much earlier than AG? I’m not understanding a window where APS would’ve shown up and left a card. Bc it seems like LE would’ve already been on the scene, so wouldn’t APS have just checked in with LE? Why leave the card?
The only way this makes sense to me is if APS was there before cops were called. Bc even if they somehow would’ve arrived before LE, AG would’ve been there. Very tight window assuming the card was left bc no one else was at the house. MOO
What this did was divert resources away from finding Guthrie. The priority became identifying the offender, resources shifted toward DNA recovery, SAR became secondary unless new evidence would have forced it, which I do not believe happened.I feel like there were no organized ground searches in Tucson where the public was involved because the sheriff came out immediately and adamantly stated that this was an obvious abduction and not a case of an elderly woman wandering off. I think that statement alone pretty much put the kibosh on anyone from the public wanting to organize one of those grid type searches you often see take place in the case of a missing person.
It does make you wonder.Sean says "alleged" ransom letters. Is he starting to doubt TMZ's credibility???
JMO but I’m thinking the card was left on the Monday, morning to early afternoon.I find the timeline of this weird. Like surely the neighbor wouldn’t have called much earlier than AG? I’m not understanding a window where APS would’ve shown up and left a card. Bc it seems like LE would’ve already been on the scene, so wouldn’t APS have just checked in with LE? Why leave the card?
The only way this makes sense to me is if APS was there before cops were called. Bc even if they somehow would’ve arrived before LE, AG would’ve been there. Very tight window assuming the card was left bc no one else was at the house. MOO
It would be nice to know when and how the flood lights were damaged. During the roofing work is likely, by a ladder or discarded roofing materials. MOO.Agree. Could be an airsoft due to the purported flood lights being damaged (shot them out?). Looks weird enough from the images that it could also be a stun gun of some sort.
JMO.
I have no idea why the sheriff is going after "unusual names", unless it's easier to research people with "unusual" names.It is curious that the gun show owner pointed out that they were "unusual names." That likely means they were not Hispanic names, which are very common in the U.S., and even more common in Arizona. JMO.
Speculation, following your excellent analysis: is there any chance that the shadow of the perp in the better footage comes from next door's Ring floodlight camera, and not moonlight? I don't have a good idea of the next door house's location relative to NG's house, but there's a previously posted three-minute video on X here from Mac Colson (CBS 5, etc.) showing LE fiddling with that floodlight camera yesterday. It looked like the investigators were may have been attempting to adjust the direction of the camera and light, among other things. Or perhaps just examine its direction.No-Backpack man is not casting a shadow from the moonlight before he steps under the cover of the the porch (in the other videos, his shadow is obvious)
Could be alleged because letters might be being sent ,but the letters are from a hoaxer not the someone involved with the kidnap.Sean says "alleged" ransom letters. Is he starting to doubt TMZ's credibility???
Makes me wonder if the roofers have all been cleared.It would be nice to know when and how the flood lights were damaged. During the roofing work is likely, by a ladder or discarded roofing materials. MOO.
I think it’s used more as a legal “CYA”, as “alleged” and “allegedly” often are by the media.Sean says "alleged" ransom letters. Is he starting to doubt TMZ's credibility???
You are probably right about that. I think a ground search by the public in the early days certainly wouldn't have hurt the investigation. I mean, in situations such as these, people really, really want to help and this would have been a good way to allow that to happen.What this did was divert resources away from finding Guthrie. The priority became identifying the offender, resources shifted toward DNA recovery, SAR became secondary unless new evidence would have forced it, which I do not believe happened.