- Joined
- Jun 30, 2010
- Messages
- 1,844
- Reaction score
- 20,745
I do not claim to be any sort of forensics expert, and I certainly think that LE and the FBI have their reasons, but wouldn't you think that the front porch Mat would be in some sort of evidence? I mean, like everything else, it is too late, but the perp was obviously standing on it. Like someone else mentioned, he could have drooled while using the flashlight. Couldn't his shoes have fibers or something from his house/car that may have possibly been left behind? That is stuff that can be compared to a potential perps actual home/car after they've been caught. Not to mention that there is a good chance there was blood on it. Maybe they just did a luminol test on site and figured that it wasn't important.
The only thing that I can think of why they didn't take the doormat is they might have assumed that it had tons of DNA from various individuals' shoes and maybe that made it an unlikely item to collect and test. Just a thought.
I do believe that they still should have collected it though.
They didn't collect the branches in Delphi at first because they said the type of surface made it difficult to test.