- Joined
- Nov 19, 2022
- Messages
- 441
- Reaction score
- 3,223
I’ve been all over the place on this case. My thoughts so far…..
I’ve wondered why if someone was interested in an inheritance they would remove the decedent. That delays an estate administration. How many years in AZ to have person declared dead? If the body is left, estate administration can begin immediately. Same with life insurance. Removing the person slows down inheritance.
Usually, when a person is taken from the home, it’s because the culprit wants others to believe they left on their own accord and nothing is wrong. Everything is fine. But this was not that. Obviously, victim was injured.
And, if the culprits took victim for money, then actually make a proper demand and try to get the money. It doesn’t appear that was done. Either they are not connected to the public demands or they made them for sport with no real expectation of recovery.
That leaves abduction out of spite/revenge or mental disturbance with disorganized thought.
At first I thought it was some kind of deranged killer looking to punish SG.
Now I’m leaning towards a kidnap for ransom that went wrong. NG probably passed while in the car while she was being driven away from her home for all we know.
The latter to me just makes more sense. I think whoever did this had experience breaking into peoples homes. He wasn’t a pro but clearly an amateur but he was too calm in front of that camera. I’m leaning towards one perp as the lantana guy seems disorganized. To have a back door guy requires coordination and I just don’t see that here. Could there be two in the sense that a separate guy sends the ransom email? Sure but I think there was one perp in that house on that night.
MOO