• #41,821
Two photos showing the general neighborhood.

Thank you 😊

It seems to me that the only neighbours who may have seen something would be the house to the R when facing NG’s.
Is that the neighbour whose camera has been repeatedly looked at ?

I feel a car could drive in NG’s driveway, quietly, with lights out, and go unnoticed. MOO

But what is the timber ramp leading to front Porch ? Maybe could be so Nancy can use her walker to get to letter box or cars in driveway . … but it also tells me that at 2am or whatever that fateful morning, there was no car waiting at the end of the porch !
I wonder was there blood on that ramp also. Like breadcrumbs for Hansel & Gretel, I think those drops would show the way she was taken.

JMO .
 
  • #41,822
BECOME A WEBSLEUTHS GUARDIAN AND KEEP ADS OFF WEBSLEUTHS AT THE SAME TIME
Only 3 bucks a month helps keep those horrid ads off of Websleuths.
Three dollars a month and you become a Websleuths Guardian.
If you enjoy Websleuths, please help us keep the ads off the forum.
Three dollars a month.
Plus, you get Guardian perks and access to our 8-hour Zoom this month
Fun extra goodies. An 8-hour Zoom call with your fellow Guardians, but best of all, you help keep Websleuths.com ad-free.

CLICK HERE and become a Websleuths Guardian
 
  • #41,823
Have authorities ever stated that the doorbell cam was disconnected physically? I feel like they meant it was disconnected from the network, suggesting someone had familiarity with the security system(s). That would narrow the search to family, very close associates, contractors (security, electric, maintenance).
 
  • #41,824
Have authorities ever stated that the doorbell cam was disconnected physically? I feel like they meant it was disconnected from the network, suggesting someone had familiarity with the security system(s). That would narrow the search to family, very close associates, contractors (security, electric, maintenance).
They've never stated whether the 1:47am "disconnect" was virtual or physical, but we do know that the camera was physically removed at some point, because it hasn't been found
 
  • #41,825
Have authorities ever stated that the doorbell cam was disconnected physically? I feel like they meant it was disconnected from the network, suggesting someone had familiarity with the security system(s). That would narrow the search to family, very close associates, contractors (security, electric, maintenance).
I'm pretty sure the 1:47am disconnection was from the network and not physically, as the camera was still in place to capture the porch videos which almost certainly happened around 2:12am
 
  • #41,826
I'm pretty sure the 1:47am disconnection was from the network and not physically, as the camera was still in place to capture the porch videos which almost certainly happened around 2:12am
So, not simply unplugged?
 
  • #41,827
  • #41,828
BECOME A WEBSLEUTHS GUARDIAN AND KEEP ADS OFF WEBSLEUTHS AT THE SAME TIME
Only 3 bucks a month helps keep those horrid ads off of Websleuths.
Three dollars a month and you become a Websleuths Guardian.
If you enjoy Websleuths, please help us keep the ads off the forum.
Three dollars a month.
Plus, you get Guardian perks and access to our 8-hour Zoom this month
Fun extra goodies. An 8-hour Zoom call with your fellow Guardians, but best of all, you help keep Websleuths.com ad-free.

CLICK HERE and become a Websleuths Guardian
Please offer an option of a one time donation for the year so I don't have to break a promise then get divorced.
 
  • #41,829
@OldCop
Thank you for the photos of the home in relationship to the neighborhood. Ok, even if he went through the back door, he came out the front door because the blood drops are obvious. I don't think the homes behind NG are relevant. The car theoretically would be seen no matter what street it was parked on. Looks like quite a distance to park the car on the street behind NG then run thru the yards, disable NG, then run thru the yards again, get the car and park it at NG's and bring her out. That doesnt even make sense. So, I will scrap that idea.

I do wonder why they think the perp came prior to the actual Lantana incident? He risked being seen in the neighborhood twice??? Makes little sense to me.

Possibly he lurked for awhile in the car then approached the door without his gear. However, why wouldnt he have disabled the camera on the first go-round? IMO, He looked, went back in his car, donned his gear and disabled the camera and went in. 1 night 1 trip 1 stalker! ;) JMO
 
  • #41,830
I think in the video of LD and his mother, when they said that ‘oh it must be to do with Nancy Guthrie’ was their first thought, I don’t think this is suspicious in itself. I think they both have lied here as they didn’t want to admit to assuming it was a drugs search - I believe he fully thought he was pulled over for a drug search and also that the mom’s first thought would be ‘my effing son better not have left drugs in the house’. They are just trying to keep up appearances.
 
  • #41,831
I'm pretty sure the 1:47am disconnection was from the network and not physically, as the camera was still in place to capture the porch videos which almost certainly happened around 2:12am
I could easily be wrong, but I thought the porch videos were at 1:47am and that some camera -- maybe a different one -- detected motion at 2:12am. Was that ever made clear to the public? Does anyone have handy a timeline from a good source?

JMO
 
  • #41,832
I think in the video of LD and his mother, when they said that ‘oh it must be to do with Nancy Guthrie’ was their first thought, I don’t think this is suspicious in itself. I think they both have lied here as they didn’t want to admit to assuming it was a drugs search - I believe he fully thought he was pulled over for a drug search and also that the mom’s first thought would be ‘my effing son better not have left drugs in the house’. They are just trying to keep up appearances.
yes! Makes total sense. Poor guy and mom are on a redemption tour of sorts. He might have a history regarding drugs but he's not a murderer. Too many people have been dragged through the mud in the last month. IMO, AB did a lot of damage. Then this guy and Carlos have been targeted by LE and the online community. Enough ! I hate seeing people kicked when they are down. Thank you @GlobeFireCandle. Excellent analysis! JMO
 
  • #41,833
I could easily be wrong, but I thought the porch videos were at 1:47am and that some camera -- maybe a different one -- detected motion at 2:12am. Was that ever made clear to the public? Does anyone have handy a timeline from a good source?

JMO
There reason I say the porch videos are around 2:12am (which indeed contradicts what LE originally said) is that the shadow length and angles mean the videos were almost definitely captured after 2am and closer to 2:10am or around there which lines up perfectly with that motion detection.

Someone else (can't remember who) on here pointed me to the shadow thing and I haven't been able to find a reasonable alternative explanation for the shadows we see in the clips
 
  • #41,834
I could easily be wrong, but I thought the porch videos were at 1:47am and that some camera -- maybe a different one -- detected motion at 2:12am. Was that ever made clear to the public? Does anyone have handy a timeline from a good source?

JMO

That same information is shared here:

"At 1:47 a.m. Sunday, a few hours after Guthrie is believed to have come home, her doorbell camera was disconnected, according to Nanos. Though he confirmed it was removed, he said “we’re not confirming that any cameras were smashed or destroyed around the house.”

About 25 minutes later, at 2:12 a.m., surveillance camera software detected movement, Nanos said."

 
Chapter 1/4

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
2,724
Total visitors
2,856

Forum statistics

Threads
644,147
Messages
18,811,741
Members
245,317
Latest member
reader24
Top