kittythehare
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2016
- Messages
- 18,562
- Reaction score
- 109,263
my understanding is that it was emergency svcs that asked the question of TM, he appeared to reply in the affirmative immediately and after a v brief pause he qualified it by stating.. 'during the day'
I thought it an unusual question for the emergency people to ask.. and when the toxicology showed such a low c2h5oh blood content, I thought TM had lied and I wondered why. Then again, the quality of the recording was very poor..
Getting back to aLansby's excellent observations re the autopsy and the broken nose, it is indeed most likely that only a man would have the skill to do this with his bare fist.
To that end should we not be looking at the case in terms of TM being the chief suspect here? The evidence points to that.. if the fractures had been caused by an implement it is likely skin would have been broken.. this is more like an uppercut..
I doubt its possible to tell on forensics whether this blow preceded the attack with weapons, or followed it, the former is the most likely.. its possible this blow could have knocked JC to the ground if he had been standing at the time.
It is not likely that such a blow was rendered to a man lying asleep
We need to rethink, methinks.
Well done you ALansby for going through the autopsy in such meticulous detail. I missed it and had to search for it because it was not mentioned immediately though it should have been obvious on superficial examination of the body..
Am wondering now whether there is more pertinent detail contained within that document....?
I thought it an unusual question for the emergency people to ask.. and when the toxicology showed such a low c2h5oh blood content, I thought TM had lied and I wondered why. Then again, the quality of the recording was very poor..
Getting back to aLansby's excellent observations re the autopsy and the broken nose, it is indeed most likely that only a man would have the skill to do this with his bare fist.
To that end should we not be looking at the case in terms of TM being the chief suspect here? The evidence points to that.. if the fractures had been caused by an implement it is likely skin would have been broken.. this is more like an uppercut..
I doubt its possible to tell on forensics whether this blow preceded the attack with weapons, or followed it, the former is the most likely.. its possible this blow could have knocked JC to the ground if he had been standing at the time.
It is not likely that such a blow was rendered to a man lying asleep
We need to rethink, methinks.
Well done you ALansby for going through the autopsy in such meticulous detail. I missed it and had to search for it because it was not mentioned immediately though it should have been obvious on superficial examination of the body..
Am wondering now whether there is more pertinent detail contained within that document....?
