nothing beyond what aw supplied to the media. The woman drove her car and tried to hit gf in front of children. The children said their mother is mean. emotional trauma doesn't leave bruises and it can be as harmful as a belt.
amen!
nothing beyond what aw supplied to the media. The woman drove her car and tried to hit gf in front of children. The children said their mother is mean. emotional trauma doesn't leave bruises and it can be as harmful as a belt.
The documents indicate AW girlfriend attacked KW - then HC went to magistrate after the fact and filed charges claiming the opposite. I have no clue what really happened. I just don't see anything that indicates that KW was the one abusing the children while EK just followed orders.
Heck if you ask my children two days ago I am the meaniest mom in the world because I wouldn't let them go to an event that EVERYONE elses mom was letting their kids go to and mine are the only two in the whole wide world who can't go. So I don't put alot of stock into a small child saying mom is mean to me.
That's a misdemeanor "assault" against a cop. More than likely EK said something that hurt the cops feelings and the cop decided to hit him with "assault." Cops do this sort of thing all the time, struggle while getting arrested? Ooops...sorry, now you've got resisting arrest. WHoa whoa...you mouthed off to me? NOW, you're getting hit with disorderly conduct. Spitting in a drunken rage in the general direction of a cop will result in an assault against a cop charge. Add to that it's only a misdemeanor assault, if it was an actual violent assault it would have been charged as a felony. I just don't buy that as evidence of his violent streak.
I have worked for Head Start for almost 20 years. In the
Middle of those years I worked for a different organization. I saw more neglect in a very high intellectual organization, than I ever saw with Head Start. Because you are poor, does not equal need. Not excusing what happened, just saying you can live in a gated community, homeless shelter or a trailer park, does not matter. You either are a good parent or you are not. Give me Head Start parents any Day!
My apologies, I wasn't very clear. I was questioning why you thought KW may have been listed as the victim in the van incident report. I really don't know but wondered if the call was placed by her or a neighbor. She obviously didn't show any injuries and nothing more was made of it. Really trying to get the mindset of whether she called and perceived herself as the victim. IMO, it was a very turbulent household and I suspect they contributed equally to the arguments and possibly even drug use.
I would not be surprised if either of these two scenarios played out. It's a very long story and I'm not going to tell it, but, I have my reasons for believing Dad, when he said that they were supposed to closely watch the eldest around other children. I took that to mean siblings, as well. I don't think that mom, or EK, were watching them, at all, and were likely making matters worse in a home, filled with EK and mom fighting, and the like. I'm not hating on a child, I'm just looking at it from stark reality. I will say, that a family I know, after years of therapy, had to place their child, a little younger than the one in this case, into another family member's home for awhile (no small children). All we know about the child's background, is what Dad has told us, and if we are to believe what he's told us, it's not good, even if the child had nothing to do with this particular incident, there is a reason they were told to watch him around other kids. It's there. Dad told us why. If I read it right.
Yes that is true, but plenty of ;employed persons have killed children.
My apologies, I wasn't very clear. I was questioning why you thought KW may have been listed as the victim in the van incident report. I really don't know but wondered if the call was placed by her or a neighbor. She obviously didn't show any injuries and nothing more was made of it. Really trying to get the mindset of whether she called and perceived herself as the victim. IMO, it was a very turbulent household and I suspect they contributed equally to the arguments and possibly even drug use.
Saw it happen just the other day. Kid got drunk, got in an altercation, cops tried to break it up, and the kid spit on the cop. The kid is currently housed in the detention center with assaulting an officer, and d&d. With the communicable diseases, being what they are today, spit is taken more seriously these days. They also hold a dim view of those who throw feces, but that's usually a mentally ill issue, or totally out of it on drugs. However, LE can drag you out of your car, turn the cams off and beat the Holy crap out of you, after pulling you over for a busted tail light. That's a-okay.
EK may very well have a mental health issue. Or a drug issue. Or perhaps both and he self-medicates. Has his juvenile record been released?
Good I'm not the only one. (I was skewered by someone somewhere else for saying it so I just keep my mouth shut. People just sooo much want to see someone pay for this that I don't think they necessarily care about getting the 100% truth. They just want their worst suspicions confirmed and then a lynching.) Before I was 70/30 that EK did it vs the eldest boy. But now I'm about split down the middle.
Here's what gets me: children don't lie about SA. BUT seriously abused and traumatized children sometimes lie about certain things when they think they are going to get in trouble. I do believe EK was abusive. I think heavy handed discipline always went too far. He was known to have rage issues. I think the boy was immersed in that. I think if its accurate that he was SA that that also played a huge factor. What I took from the first leaked CPS documents was that he was SA in the past and had started acting out toward other children. This is actually something that's seen in child victims of sex abuse. Violence is also common. Its also very common that they do it to children their own age and younger. Even infants. (I promise I'll find links later. My phone has been acting weird and I'm scared to navigate away and lose all of what I've written. Its just finally good to get this out because its been gnawing at me and it gnaws even more because I can't discuss with anyone because its the unpopular opinion.). I also think that's why he got his nose busted that day. IF the documents AW leaked are accurate, KW tended to just ignore the problem. I'm thinking maybe the pair thought physical discipline was an appropriate corrective measure. I also think its possible the boy tried to deflect and blame EK for an act he himself did. (EK was volatile and possibly physically abusive. The boy had every reason to want to make him get in trouble. Its not unheard of in abused children to lie about abuse from their caregiver if they think it will keep them out of trouble. Because trouble for them has usually meant something different than a time out.).
I think EK and KW both knew and tried to cover it up. I do not think they were trying to protect the child. I think they were trying to hide possibly drug use and definitely their own negligence. Especially if they were aware the boy needed help and failed to do so.
I do not know if EK perpetrated any SA in the house. I tend to lean towards no but I'm not sure and wouldn't be surprised if the answer was that he did. I do know that the father did not allege that he did in the first report. Only that something had previously happened to the boy. What I took from the CPS papers was that he was caught with a child (friend of KWs child) doing inappropriate things and that he was therefore not supposed to be unsupervised around kids.
I also still think it's entirely possible that EK raged during a bender and went too far with a beating and they blamed the boy because he has a history with it and had "caused problems" for them before.
I think it happened before the night that they said it did. I think KW stayed home to both grieve and clean the house. I think they possibly had drugs or paraphernalia and since I genuinely think they were covering their own asses and not the child's that they wanted to make it appear that they weren't as negligent as they probably are- knowing that there would be police coming through for a missing persons investigation soon.
I think that's why we aren't seeing charges yet. I think it's because the police are still trying to determine which one did it.
These are all only my opinions, but I really do think one of these two scenarios to be the most likely.
Yeah, the problem with continually giving EK the benefit of the doubt means that everyone else is lying - LE, the neighbors, the boys, and AW.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
I respectfully disagree with part of your premise. Children don’t usually lie about SA but it does happen. Several years ago in a sleepy little town I was living in a SA allegation became public that rocked the town. Two young boys had accused the most highly sought Pediatrician in the area of molesting them. the man was married with 4 children of his own still at home and a wonderful wife. He was instantly conviceted in the court of public opinion and parents pulled their children from his care. He had to shut down his practice. His wife grieved herself to death.
Just as the trial was beginning the boys recanted. It seemed they had gone somewhere they were not supposed to be and missed curfew. The decided before heading home they would tell their parents this work of fiction so they wouldn’t get in trouble. They also said they thought it would be funny as well. The charges were dismissed. The damage was done. He was able to get his medical license returned but the practice was gone and many parents still didn’t trust him. His wife has passed away while being shamed and ridiculed by the community. His children had been ostracized and his savings devestated. He opened a small practice which never did a lot of business.
And the boys had lied.
JMHO
Who and why would someone tell someone other than who was a participant or witness? If I were trying to cover up a crime I wouldn't tell anyone! Unless I trusted them completely and needed their help. So, how and why did KW's father know?
good question.....but if you can't tell mommy or daddy then who can you tell
Eh? I don't believe that children come up with a sexual abuse excuse for being late home, unless they have been abused sexually or been exposed to sexual material. While that doctor may have not been abusing them, someone was.
snipped for space
I find it hard to believe that the two of them found Mariah dead by the hands of someone else and immediately realized AND ACCEPTED that she was dead which then led them to cover it up and call her in as a missing child later. It's not impossible, but I just have a hard time believing that one.
I don't know either but IMO it's certain he was involved in her death. I can see a scenario where both abused the kids or in which mom allowed it to happen which is the same thing in my book.
This is the kind of thing we see over and over and over again. Everything is normal until the new partner comes on the scene. Then both join in on a gradually escalating abuse scenario. That's my gut here.
But no way would that dude dispose of the body if he wasn't involved.