Jeana (DP) said:
With all due respect, we don't even know her name, so how she could possibly be "villified" is beyond me. The young men who have been accused on the other hand, have had their photographs and their names splash across the front page of every publication in existence, have been suspended from school and will forever be suspect, whether they're ever proven guilty in a court of law or not. I'm not sure what happened to innocent until proven guilty, but these kids' now have to prove that they are innocent.
Hi Jeana - Long time no see! :blowkiss:
We may not know her name yet but we know more about her personal life than most other people! I'm sure her name will come out soon enough just like the girl who charged Kobe Bryant - and I believe it's a matter of time before her photos are slipped to the internet. This article shows what the defense attorneys have used to try to discredit her.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/lacrosse/2006-04-10-duke-dna-tests_x.htm
"Over the weekend, they told reporters that photos taken at the party show the woman was injured even before she arrived, and impaired, too. And while answering questions about their clients' legal troubles about a third of the current team has been charged in recent years with public urination, underage possession of alcohol and disorderly conduct they have suggested that the woman's own criminal past undermines her credibility.
They pointed to a June 2002 incident in which the alleged victim stole the taxi of a man to whom she was giving a lap dance at a Durham strip club. Court records say she led a sheriff's deputy on a winding chase at up to 70 mph, and tried to run him down as he approached the cab.
She pleaded guilty to misdemeanor counts of larceny, speeding to elude arrest, assault on a government official and driving while impaired, and spent some weekends in jail.
The players' attorneys have also attacked the woman's statement to police that she and another dancer left the party in fear after the crowd became "excited and aggressive," returning only after one of the players apologized."
I agree she doesn't sound like a model citizen, but these examples are not ones of extortion or false accusations so I'm not sure how relevant they are to a rape case.
As for the boys being innocent until proven guilty, we question people who haven't even been formally charged all the time here and are constantly reminded not to attack the victim. I'm just trying to stay within those boundaries in my own post despite the fact I'm not sure which side I believe. I don't know why all this isn't saved for court anyway if each side is sooo confident they are right.
I have to admit the more I read the more my hinky-meter goes off like one of the other posters said, but I still like to give my two cents. It may or may not be right, but it's all I've got. :blushing: