NE NE - Corrie Wood, 28, Grant, 20 September 2008 #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #301
LE hasn't revealed any names it just so happens that they Knew Scott was in a relationship with Corrie so that's how his name came about. Something to think about. No relationship is perfect everyone fights at some point in time but that doesn't mean you are going to hurt the other person. I miss Corrie so much and I have faith it will soon be solved.:)

I understand that. The point I'm making is that Scott's name was brought up on this website, another website and in the newspapers because he was the one that found her and called 911 (and of course, because he was her boyfriend). Had the friend found her, her name probably would have been mentioned instead.

And regardless, if Corrie and Scott fought all the time, once in awhile or this had been the first time (and I have reason to believe this was NOT the first time it got physical), it doesn't matter...accidents happen. I think they got into it (for many different reasons I've heard) and it got out of hand. I think he unintentionally killed her. She was really inebriated (I heard what their tab at the Cactus was that night) and probably couldn't defend herself very well. I truly think it was an accident, but regardless, it happened and now it's time for justice.

Unfortunately, spousal abuse can lead to accidental (and sometimes intentional) death. Sadly, it happens all the time.
 
  • #302
I understand that. The point I'm making is that Scott's name was brought up on this website, another website and in the newspapers because he was the one that found her and called 911 (and of course, because he was her boyfriend). Had the friend found her, her name probably would have been mentioned instead.

And regardless, if Corrie and Scott fought all the time, once in awhile or this had been the first time (and I have reason to believe this was NOT the first time it got physical), it doesn't matter...accidents happen. I think they got into it (for many different reasons I've heard) and it got out of hand. I think he unintentionally killed her. She was really inebriated (I heard what their tab at the Cactus was that night) and probably couldn't defend herself very well. I truly think it was an accident, but regardless, it happened and now it's time for justice.

Unfortunately, spousal abuse can lead to accidental (and sometimes intentional) death. Sadly, it happens all the time.

Another reason to be interested in Scott is that he has served time in prison for terroristic threatening. (Does anyone know what that was all about?) That indicates, to me at least, that he's got an anger problem.
 
  • #303
  • #304
You say you aren't one to point fingers but you are pointing at Scott. Everyone fights so big deal no one is perfect. I just know who MMLEIKAM is and anyone can view the myspace page. Maybe since you and NSC have exchanged numbers you can hopefully figure this out since you communicate a lot. I wish you both the best of luck:blowkiss:

Yeah everyone has arguments, but not everyone gets into pyhsical fights...And what are you talking about NSC and I exchanging numbers??? I don't know where you are getting your info but you are wrong...I don't even know NSC, only that they are a poster on this website.
 
  • #305
I found an interesting link:

http://74.125.95.104/search?q=cache....pdf+"Petro,+Scott"&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=13&gl=us


I am wondering if Scott had a construction business prior to being incarcerated and this might be where the theft by deceptive practices and terroristic threats come into play...

Actually, it looks like Scott was incarcerated twice.
The first time:
4/22/2002-8/19/2004 Theft by deception, terroristic threats
http://dcs-inmatesearch.ne.gov/Corrections/InmateDisplayServlet?DcsId=56799
And the second time
6/12/2005-3/8/2006 Theft by deception
http://dcs-inmatesearch.ne.gov/Corrections/InmateDisplayServlet?DcsId=62225
 
  • #306
  • #307
Yes he was incarcerated twice, once for theft by deception and once for terroristic threats...

The first one was for theft by deception, too, and terroristic threats.

Sentence Dates Facility:



Total Sentence: 2 Years 0 Months 0 Days To 4 Years 0 Months 0 Days Sentence Begin Date: 04/22/2002 Good Time Law: 364 Projected Release Date: 08/19/2004 Parole Information Parole Eligibility Date: 02/19/2003 Parole Hearing Date:
Next Parole Board Review Date: 12/2004 Parole Discharge Date:
Parole Discharge Type:
Release Information Release Date: 08/19/2004 Reason for Release: MANDATORY DISCHARGE Offense Information Offense Term Description Run Code Minimum Maximum County of Commitment THEFT BY DECEPTION CC 1 Yr 0 Mo 0 Da 2 Yr 0 Mo 0 Da LANCASTER Felony - - TERRORISTIC THREATS CS 1 Yr 0 Mo 0 Da 2 Yr 0 Mo 0 Da LANCASTER Felony - -
 
  • #308
Another reason to be interested in Scott is that he has served time in prison for terroristic threatening. (Does anyone know what that was all about?) That indicates, to me at least, that he's got an anger problem.


Don't forget that he almost killed someone whether it was inside prison or outside of prison. I would say he has a pretty hot temper.

Another thing that made me suspect Scott and probably the most important one to me is the fact that Corrie's parents refused to allow him to attend her service. To me that speaks volumes. As Corrie is their daughter I would think that they know more about her relationship with Scott then anyone else would. If Scott was so good to Corrie and they had such a great relationship why would her parents forbid him to come to her service... aside from believing that he was involved in her death in some way.

I really don't think that it was some random person that just happened to show up at Corrie's home and then decided to murder her. Even if there were a lot of strangers in town during that time I think it was someone who knew her and was very angry at her....the blows to the head and body speak of someone who was in a rage.
 
  • #309
Why are you so interested in Scott?

If you would like more information on why Scott is probably being looked at, you might want to take a look at this site.
http://www.lincoln.ne.gov/cnty/attorn/ccase.htm
Search by name, then click on the last name when it comes up. Click on each case number to see the charges and disposition.If you feel it would be an invasion of privacy,which it is not, DON'T GO THERE. It is all public information posted by Lancaster County, Nebr. Keep in mind this is only one county in the state of Nebraska, as far as his criminal record goes. I will be the first to say people can change, but with a record like this, you can not disregard it and I'm sure he knows that.
There is a post on Blue Crime Hunter that states the business was Scott and Corrie's. It further states the loans are all in Scott's name and if you really want to know, go ask the Bank!!! That's not going to happen I'm sure. It could be she co-signed with him, which would make it her obligation too, which in turn makes her money(if she had anything of worth) involved. However, you can go to the Court House and check for liens, as that too, is public information. Right now I'm not that interested in finding out ownership or whatever, as I don't feel that was the motive. Whether it was Scott or someone else who has not been in the spotlight, I am also leaning toward the accidental thing. I think things just got out of hand, she was more seriously injured than either party knew, went to bed and died. Even if this is so, it is still murder and hopefully the guilty party can be found.
 
  • #310
Why are you so interested in Scott?

If you would like more information on why Scott is probably being looked at, you might want to take a look at this site.
http://www.lincoln.ne.gov/cnty/attorn/ccase.htm
Search by name, then click on the last name when it comes up. Click on each case number to see the charges and disposition.If you feel it would be an invasion of privacy,which it is not, DON'T GO THERE. It is all public information posted by Lancaster County, Nebr. Keep in mind this is only one county in the state of Nebraska, as far as his criminal record goes. I will be the first to say people can change, but with a record like this, you can not disregard it and I'm sure he knows that.
There is a post on Blue Crime Hunter that states the business was Scott and Corrie's. It further states the loans are all in Scott's name and if you really want to know, go ask the Bank!!! That's not going to happen I'm sure. It could be she co-signed with him, which would make it her obligation too, which in turn makes her money(if she had anything of worth) involved. However, you can go to the Court House and check for liens, as that too, is public information. Right now I'm not that interested in finding out ownership or whatever, as I don't feel that was the motive. Whether it was Scott or someone else who has not been in the spotlight, I am also leaning toward the accidental thing. I think things just got out of hand, she was more seriously injured than either party knew, went to bed and died. Even if this is so, it is still murder and hopefully the guilty party can be found.


Good luck going to the bank and asking. They can't and won't give information out that is a privacy issue big time. I wasn't talking about the prision web site being invasion of privacy i was just stating that I wouldn't want a picture of my home put on a crime web page. Just remember that there is more to this than you know and from what you have been posting non of it is true. I will find out if I can release some information and get back to all of you.
 
  • #311
Good luck going to the bank and asking. They can't and won't give information out that is a privacy issue big time. I wasn't talking about the prision web site being invasion of privacy i was just stating that I wouldn't want a picture of my home put on a crime web page. Just remember that there is more to this than you know and from what you have been posting non of it is true. I will find out if I can release some information and get back to all of you.

I was not talking to you specifically. I was just answering your question about why he is probably being looked at. What I just posted is True, as well as some of my other posts. The rest of what I posted is opinion and speculation as I usually state. I think I stated, in different words, you were not going to get that info from the bank. Unless of course the same person that works for the Bank also works at the Cell Co.
 
  • #312
I would like to know why "worried" thinks they know so much information about people who have been posting on this site. I would also like to know why "worried" can post and state what they think they know but then when they get asked a question about it then they just ignore and they don't give any answer... That's typical of someone who likes to talk and think they know everything but then when confronted they get quiet!!!:chicken:
 
  • #313
I would like to know why "worried" thinks they know so much information about people who have been posting on this site. I would also like to know why "worried" can post and state what they think they know but then when they get asked a question about it then they just ignore and they don't give any answer... That's typical of someone who likes to talk and think they know everything but then when confronted they get quiet!!!:chicken:

no it's not that and no i'm not a chicken either. Maybe I am trying to respect other people and only law enforcement need to know. As I stated I after I get approval I will let everyone know. Say what you want about me but you will be appologizing soon. I'm not worried that this crime will go unsolved:) And yes you will also be appologizing to other people too.


:clap:
 
  • #314
no it's not that and no i'm not a chicken either. Maybe I am trying to respect other people and only law enforcement need to know. As I stated I after I get approval I will let everyone know. Say what you want about me but you will be appologizing soon. I'm not worried that this crime will go unsolved:) And yes you will also be appologizing to other people too.


:clap:

Well I don't know who you are and I don't know why you think you know so much about everyone but...if it is so black and white and so clear then why don't you just come out with it??? Trying to respect people?? Like who, the killer?? Only law enforcement needs to know??? Why so this can just go unsolved and Corrie and Kyleigh get no justice??? If you know something so valuable then have you called it into crime stoppers??? Whatever...Trying to get approval?? From who to say what??? Thats dumb, I'll believe it when I see it...Big Talker we've got here!! And apologizing...ha, NO probably not!! Oh and by the way, you still didn't answer my question, so back to the orignial thing here, why do you think you know so much about people who post on here. If you are not a chicken then come out with it and say what you know and how you know it!!!
 
  • #315
no it's not that and no i'm not a chicken either. Maybe I am trying to respect other people and only law enforcement need to know. As I stated I after I get approval I will let everyone know. Say what you want about me but you will be appologizing soon. I'm not worried that this crime will go unsolved:) And yes you will also be appologizing to other people too.
:clap:

Okay, I'm open-minded. Who should we be looking at?

While we have the most information about Scott, and he's the most likely (statistically) suspect, there are other people that we know nothing about. For instance:
Wyatt's mother
Corrie's ex-husband
The woman that drove Corrie home
Random, transient worker
An unknown friend or acquaintance with a grudge

Do you know anything about any of these people that would make it likely or even possible that one of them killed Corrie?

Someone killed her. And I'm not going to apologize to anyone for trying to figure out who it was.
 
  • #316
I for one am not going to attack or belittle anyone for their imput. Everyone has a right to post their opinions and speculations. This is what this is all about. Ideas being thrown out to be read and proven or disaproved might just be the thing that helps solve this. I am very curious what information Worried has and hope it can be brought to light. If what Worried has is fact but does not want to divulge it or can't, it will be brought to light in some other fashion sooner or later.
 
  • #317
Okay, I'm open-minded. Who should we be looking at?

While we have the most information about Scott, and he's the most likely (statistically) suspect, there are other people that we know nothing about. For instance:
Wyatt's mother
Corrie's ex-husband
The woman that drove Corrie home
Random, transient worker
An unknown friend or acquaintance with a grudge

Do you know anything about any of these people that would make it likely or even possible that one of them killed Corrie?

Someone killed her. And I'm not going to apologize to anyone for trying to figure out who it was.

I agree :clap: I am OPEN to hearing different theories...

Corrie's ex is not a suspect. I have been in contact with some locals and he is not the one. Kyleigh was staying with him when Corrie was murdered... Other than that I guess anyone could be game.
 
  • #318
Well I don't know who you are and I don't know why you think you know so much about everyone but...if it is so black and white and so clear then why don't you just come out with it??? Trying to respect people?? Like who, the killer?? Only law enforcement needs to know??? Why so this can just go unsolved and Corrie and Kyleigh get no justice??? If you know something so valuable then have you called it into crime stoppers??? Whatever...Trying to get approval?? From who to say what??? Thats dumb, I'll believe it when I see it...Big Talker we've got here!! And apologizing...ha, NO probably not!! Oh and by the way, you still didn't answer my question, so back to the orignial thing here, why do you think you know so much about people who post on here. If you are not a chicken then come out with it and say what you know and how you know it!!!

I don't need to call it in the LE already know about it and that's that and yes I do respect people. MMLEIKAM wasn't hard to figure out who she was she didn't hid it like she stated before. LE already know what I know so as long as they know since they will be the one solving this crime and not any of us that's it. If you want to know then ask LE and maybe they could help you out. To answer your question NO NO NO I am not protecting the killer I would never do that due to the fact I want justice for ALL of her family and friends.
 
  • #319
Thank you "Worried" for finally clearing that up. That was not the answer I was hoping for but non the less it is an answer. I can understand your thinking if LE already knew about it and what ever it is, depending on what it is, could jeprodize the case if it got out.
 
  • #320
I don't need to call it in the LE already know about it and that's that and yes I do respect people. MMLEIKAM wasn't hard to figure out who she was she didn't hid it like she stated before. LE already know what I know so as long as they know since they will be the one solving this crime and not any of us that's it. If you want to know then ask LE and maybe they could help you out. To answer your question NO NO NO I am not protecting the killer I would never do that due to the fact I want justice for ALL of her family and friends.

Fine...good to know, whatever. It's sure funny how you have still avoided my original question...saying that NSC and I have exchanged numbers and have been in contact...I would like to know where you get your info?? You are wrong and I just don't appreciate your speculation about random people and especially when it involves myself...This is the same question that I have asked now at least 3 times if not more and you have still managed to tip toe around it every time you make a reply...:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
108
Guests online
2,004
Total visitors
2,112

Forum statistics

Threads
632,811
Messages
18,632,012
Members
243,304
Latest member
Fractured Truths
Back
Top