And if he knew he had cancer, then it explains why he was not careful. One of the main things they look for in serial killers ( and child molesters) is there was a type that the bad guy looked for, all females, all males etc., but either both groups of perps have gotten smarter or simply more deviant, because there is way more crossover making it harder on investigators. This case screams all of the known markers for an old time serial killer , and the old man sure would fit the bill.It would add up if it were the work of Coffel. Whoever would be responsible for these deaths would be very... bad at hiding bodies since they are all being found. Probably didn't care if he got caught being in his late 60's.
or were serial killers missed because LE looked for types? Tommy Lynn Sells (1964-2014) was never on anyone's radar because he killed men, women and children and traveled coast-to-coast. Then he married and settled down. He made the mistake of leaving a little girl alive - with a cut throat. She managed to walk to a neighbor's house for help and to describe him.And if he knew he had cancer, then it explains why he was not careful. One of the main things they look for in serial killers ( and child molesters) is there was a type that the bad guy looked for, all females, all males etc., but either both groups of perps have gotten smarter or simply more deviant, because there is way more crossover making it harder on investigators. This case screams all of the known markers for an old time serial killer , and the old man sure would fit the bill.
Jillian has been found safe!She hasn't been found yet but I'll bring this over anyway. Very concerning.
If anything, it would easily be a women, since Radford puts out an annual report on this (last was 2023!), and found 54.5% of the time women will use poison before ay other means of killing, while only like 2.4% of men do this instead. Male serial killer are more likely to strangle, stab, use a gun, bludgeoned, or an axe/machete before using poison.After reviewing all publicly available data, I believe there may be a common thread that hasn't been thoroughly investigated: the possibility of poisoning using fast-degrading, hard-to-detect compounds.
In particular, I’m proposing a theory that fits the unusual patterns in many of the deaths—where cause is inconclusive, no overt trauma is found, and decomposition or environmental exposure might have obscured key forensic evidence. Poisons like colchicine or aconitine (from monkshood) are plausible.
I would agree, a woman would also be able to easily approach her victims more than a man as she generally wouldn't be considered a threat by many people. If posion was administered it would have to be through ingestion as injection or inhalation would alert the victim or take too much time, the victims couldn't have been drugged because that would show on a panel tox screen. The poison would have to be administered through digestion which could mean that the victims were picked at either bars, restaurants, etc. This is ofcourse all speculation based on the info avaliable to the public.If anything, it would easily be a women, since Radford puts out an annual report on this (last was 2023!), and found 54.5% of the time women will use poison before ay other means of killing, while only like 2.4% of men do this instead. Male serial killer are more likely to strangle, stab, use a gun, bludgeoned, or an axe/machete before using poison.
View attachment 598003
Which means by your theory, it would be a woman responsible for this for years or even decades.
Especially if she was doing a death angel motivation of thinking she is "saving" people she deemed on the fringes or "sinning", like homeless people, sex workers, runaways, people who wouldn't be easily missed if they went missing. Hence why back in the day SK's easily targeted people like this because police wrote them off as not important, like what happened with Gilgo Beach.I would agree, a woman would also be able to easily approach her victims more than a man as she generally wouldn't be considered a threat by many people. If posion was administered it would have to be through ingestion as injection or inhalation would alert the victim or take too much time, the victims couldn't have been drugged because that would show on a panel tox screen. The poison would have to be administered through digestion which could mean that the victims were picked at either bars, restaurants, etc. This is ofcourse all speculation based on the info avaliable to the public.
I appreciate the discussion. But some of these assumptions are a little beyond what the public data supports. There was no witnesses and no detailed description of a certain individual. For example, I’m not sure how we can determine military training or religious motivation without any confirmed behavioral signatures. Shouldn't we stick to what can be logically assumed based on geography, victims profiles, etc.?Especially if she was doing a death angel motivation of thinking she is "saving" people she deemed on the fringes or "sinning", like homeless people, sex workers, runaways, people who wouldn't be easily missed if they went missing. Hence why back in the day SK's easily targeted people like this because police wrote them off as not important, like what happened with Gilgo Beach.
Another is nursing home, pharmacy, or hospital, like in phlebotomy, CNA, or someone who has access to narcotics and medicine like a pharmacist.
I wonder if there are any homeless shelters, soup kitchens, or something similar like a church that helps those in need as there is a category of SKs who are motivated by religious reasons (good vs evil). If there is one that is like the middle point in every direction of the most victims found, that's where everyone can start mapping out who it could be.
Often times, it's the last person would think is capable of such acts and vile behaviors because they blend so well into the places they live by being very social and always overly friendly with everyone in town or they have a cover with a family as their way to look "normal" so no one questions the person with a family and a normal job, who is involved in their community.
This is the kind of profile I'm thinking it could be hypothetically:
- Height is probably 5'4" - 5'8"
- Dark brown to light brown hair
- Brown or Hazel eyes
- Mixed or white passing (easy way to not get caught is if you blend in and most of the victims are POC)
- Probably in their 50's now, probably started this in their mid to late 20's
- Probably grew up on a farm or military brat
- Military trained ( ie - how they can drag/carry body and defend themselves)
- Works for either a hospital, pharmacy, nursing home, church, shelter, or two areas like works for one of these and volunteers for a shelter or church to create a "clean" imagine to the public.
- Probably has a hatred for their mother and targets victims who remind them of their mother
- Might have a strict code and routine they live by so no one catches them, which is why no one has caught them yet.
But my other theory is it's two different people, a woman and a man, overlapping in the same areas. Woman is local and the guy is probably long haul truck driver.
I appreciate the discussion. But some of these assumptions are a little beyond what the public data supports. There was no witnesses and no detailed description of a certain individual. For example, I’m not sure how we can determine military training or religious motivation without any confirmed behavioral signatures. Shouldn't we stick to what can be logically assumed based on geography, victims profiles, etc.?