NEw Search Warrant Tonight. Dec.4th, 2007

[chicoliving]

Link to video and the screen shot at this link says

Grand Jury Search Warrant

"....may have been utlilized in the commission of the offense of first degree murder or the concealment of a homicidal death"


http://www.myfoxchicago.com/myfox/p...n=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1

 

[Leila]

Link to video and the screen shot at this link says

Grand Jury Search Warrant

"....may have been utlilized in the commission of the offense of first degree murder or the concealment of a homicidal death"


http://www.myfoxchicago.com/myfox/p...n=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1

Could it be that the reason for this warrant is that it's a warrant from the grand jury, as opposed to a police search warrant?

 

[closeobserver]

Could it be that the reason for this warrant is that it's a warrant from the grand jury, as opposed to a police search warrant?

http://www.suntimes.com/news/peterson/680965,petersonsearch120407b.article

At the end of this story, DP is quoted that the rumors of him doing a spread for Playgirl magazine are false. What a class act.

 

[chicoliving]

The warrant that Illinois State Police delivered to Drew Peterson's Bolingbrook home on Tuesday evening dealt with items inside two vehicles already seized from the residence, said Charles Pelkie, a spokesman for the Will County state's attorney's office.

"It expands the scope of the initial search warrant regarding items in his vehicles," Pelkie said. He declined to elaborate, including what items police found or were searching for.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=5814759

 

[mysteriew]

Peterson's attorney, Joel Brodsky, told WFLD-TV that the warrant says police are seeking items that "may have been utilized in commission of the offense of first-degree murder or the concealment of a homicidal death."

The warrant also indicates interest in trace elements of several materials, including blue plastic, Brodsky told the Fox affiliate.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g9LSLrzFQGStXb1io5FdErAtFFKgD8TB35O00

When they write a search warrant they try to make it as general as they can, but the law prohibits how general they can go and they must have some evidence or indication that points to the items they are searching for as being involved in the crime. So the part about "May have been utilized in commission of the offense of first-degree murder." interests me.

When we have considered theories before of how the crime went down, we always thought the argument happened in the bedroom. And maybe it started there. But what if during the argument Stacy got dressed and said she was leaving. Drew P has been using the garage door to enter the home and it appears that most others do too. What if Stacy used the garage door to exit the home that Sunday and Drew P followed her out. It could have happened in the garage, and Drew P could have then backed the car up into the garage and put Stacy's body into the trunk. Who would think twice about a homeowner working in and around his car in a garage on a Sunday?And that is why the urgency to get Stacy's car out of there and away from the home. It also explains the kids thinking that Stacy left and went to see Grandpa because the last they saw of her, she was headed out the door into the garage- Drew probably told them the Grandpa part.

 

[mysteriew]

The vehicles were taken after a search warrant was executed Nov. 1. Drew Peterson's attorney, Joel Brodsky, said the latest search warrant may jeopardize the state's case if his client should be charged in connection with Stacy Peterson's disappearance.

"They're serving a new search warrant ... to correct errors in the original search warrant," Brodsky said. "The original warrants only authorized a search of the vehicles, not a seizure. That means that potentially any evidence -- and I'm not saying there is any -- that they've acquired from the vehicles prior to today could be tossed out of court for illegal seizure."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...ec05,0,7006993.story?coll=chi-homepagebiz-utl

 

[Camper]

http://www.suntimes.com/news/peterson/680965,petersonsearch120407b.article

At the end of this story, DP is quoted that the rumors of him doing a spread for Playgirl magazine are false. What a class act.

--->>>Even DP does not realize how mentally corrupt he is!!!!

Elsewhere in this forum, it was said that the second search warrant could negate the first search warrant in that areas of search that were not presented in the first could negate similar items asked for in the second search warrant.:angel: :banghead:

BUT as a matter of law, when the first search warrant was issued the - the Grand Jury had not convened, AM I RIGHT???

Need a legal answer on how IF IF IF a new matter is discovered in the GJ testimony and and IF IF it sorta covers a search item in the first search warrant would the GJ testimony supercede the first finding?

.

 

[mysteriew]

This is the fourth warrant issued since Stacy Peterson disappeared in late October.
http://www.abc15.com/news/national/story.aspx?content_id=1dc618ef-564b-4af5-93e4-5f5271713991

Is this an error on ABC's part? Warrants 1 and 2 were served on the home. What was warrant 3?
Warrant 1- Initial search of the home
Warrant 2- Police returned to the home, stayed briefly and said they were looking for something small and said they found it.
Warrant 3- ?
Warrant 4- Seizure of items in the vehicles

NBC is also calling it a 4th warrant

Fourth Search Warrant Executed At Peterson's Home
Peterson Downplays Search Warrant
http://www.nbc5.com/news/14777153/detail.html

 

[mysteriew]

An attorney for Drew Peterson says a search warrant served on his client tonight indicates interest in trace elements of several materials -- including blue plastic.
http://www.wthitv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7452255

 

[mysteriew]

Brodsky has proposed two theories for the latest search warrant:

It is an excuse to keep the cars longer.
It is an attempt to correct an error in the first search warrant which allowd for a search of the vehicles, but not the seizure of any evidence in the vehicles. Now if this one is correct, wouldn't he have pointed this out before now?

Brodsky like Drew P seems to have as one of his goals to alienate as many people as possible, just like his client Drew P.

 

[DeltaDawn]

It was stated this was a warrant from the Grand Jury. could it be that the Grand Jury has requested more specfic info on the cars and what was found, or not found yet,,and this proceeds LE 's desire to find whatever the GJ has asked for?

Just thinking that the GJ meets again today and maybe they wanted something very specific that they had questions about looked into involving the cars..so this addt'l warrant came from them.

 

[dee10134]

This is the fourth warrant issued since Stacy Peterson disappeared in late October.
http://www.abc15.com/news/national/story.aspx?content_id=1dc618ef-564b-4af5-93e4-5f5271713991

Is this an error on ABC's part? Warrants 1 and 2 were served on the home. What was warrant 3?
Warrant 1- Initial search of the home
Warrant 2- Police returned to the home, stayed briefly and said they were looking for something small and said they found it.
Warrant 3- ?
Warrant 4- Seizure of items in the vehicles

NBC is also calling it a 4th warrant

Fourth Search Warrant Executed At Peterson's Home
Peterson Downplays Search Warrant
http://www.nbc5.com/news/14777153/detail.html

Maybe that "something small" was the bikini that DP says Stacy took with her..... :liar:

 

[Taximom]

Warrant 2- Police returned to the home, stayed briefly and said they were looking for something small and said they found it.

LE, please let DrewP you have found his brain. Thank you.

 

[DeltaDawn]

This is the fourth warrant issued since Stacy Peterson disappeared in late October.
http://www.abc15.com/news/national/story.aspx?content_id=1dc618ef-564b-4af5-93e4-5f5271713991

Is this an error on ABC's part? Warrants 1 and 2 were served on the home. What was warrant 3?
Warrant 1- Initial search of the home
Warrant 2- Police returned to the home, stayed briefly and said they were looking for something small and said they found it.
Warrant 3- ?
Warrant 4- Seizure of items in the vehicles

NBC is also calling it a 4th warrant

Fourth Search Warrant Executed At Peterson's Home
Peterson Downplays Search Warrant
http://www.nbc5.com/news/14777153/detail.html

WASN'T THE 3RD WARRANT FOR THE TWO VEHICLES , separate from the items in the house?

 

[DeltaDawn]

Warrant 2- Police returned to the home, stayed briefly and said they were looking for something small and said they found it.

LE, please let DrewP you have found his brain. Thank you.

LOL, that's a good one!

Maybe they were looking for small bugs, tracking devices that DP had already removed from Stacy's car? Or her second cell phone..Drew may not have realized she had the second one?

 

[SewingDeb]

Good thoughts Delta Dawn.

 

[mysteriew]

WASN'T THE 3RD WARRANT FOR THE TWO VEHICLES , separate from the items in the house?

The vehicles were taken at the same time of the first warrant and I thought it was on the same warrant.

I guess they could have had two warrants- one for the search of the home, the second to seize the computers and vehicles and other items found during the search.

 

[DeltaDawn]

From what I heard on Greta the GJ did not meet today. They will instead meet next week possibly.

Maybe they are waiting to get the results of the search warrant last night and the canal search today into tomorrow. I hope they are getting what they need..this seems to be coming more and more specific, to me that means that they know exactly what and where these items of evidence may be found, and exactly what they are looking for.

 

[Leila]

It was stated this was a warrant from the Grand Jury. could it be that the Grand Jury has requested more specfic info on the cars and what was found, or not found yet,,and this proceeds LE 's desire to find whatever the GJ has asked for?

Just thinking that the GJ meets again today and maybe they wanted something very specific that they had questions about looked into involving the cars..so this addt'l warrant came from them.

I think the difference is that this IS a warrant from the grand jury. The language used in this warrant is different in that they used the term "forfeiture" indicating that if the vehicle was used in the commission of a felony, it could be withheld permanently.

In the warrant it asks for trace evidence of particles from a blue container, scuba weights, and other materials. This could be additional items not in the first two warrants?

 

[SeriouslySearching]

The new search warrant also is requesting anything that could contain bodily fluids, blood, fingernail clippings, urine, etc. on item or in items is the way I take it to read. It goes on and on about many things such as underneath the vehicles to include any foreign matter, dirt, etc. (Shouldn't we be able to get a copy of that?)

A poster put it up on Gretawire night owl's blog...but I forgot to copy it! Sorry.