New Searches based ON CASEY Sightings. JB advises Casey to reveal nothing

[liltigress]

Great! Can you post a link since the calendar doesn't reflect anything happening on those two days?

I can only add to her online postings for these 2 dates.

June 21st 6:43pm
good times last night!

Casey wrote to "little one " on myspace
June 21st 7:02pm
Oh yes I know! haha.
you're amazing girly!
looking forward to the all white party this weekend.

From Casey (not sure who to)
June 22, 2008 19:29
its been agesill give you a call this week

 

[Marina2]

I wouldn't pass over the 22nd at this point either. I wish we knew more about this tip that came in, like what time of day was she spotted and what day of the week.

II guess we shouldn't pass over the 20th either. That's the day she allegedly ran out of gas and needed TL to take her to get the cans.

GA's police report stating the 22nd as the day of the break in for gas has been disregarded by me because he has subsequently flip flopped on the actual day of the break in.

 

[Baznme]

I can only add to her online postings for these 2 dates.

June 21st 6:43pm
good times last night!

Casey wrote to "little one " on myspace
June 21st 7:02pm
Oh yes I know! haha.
you're amazing girly!
looking forward to the all white party this weekend.

From Casey (not sure who to)
June 22, 2008 19:29
its been agesill give you a call this week

I'm assuming all of these are PM messages. These can be done by phone, correct? Assuming it is correct that they were all PM messages and this girl is used to making 50 calls a day, this seems pretty quiet for her, don't you think?

 

[pizmex]

I've read most of this thread and disagree with a lot of the premises. I would never ever have publicly said what Baez said (and is a central focus of this thread). If nothing else, the comment is in poor state, and lacks the professionalism that Baez should be reflecting whenever he comments publicly.

ButI think that the comment itself, on the merits, is so vague, so susceptible to many interpretations, that I just don't see how so many can here can determine that Casey knows where Caylee's body is just from Baez's statement.

I don't doubt for a split second that Casey purposely disposed of Caylee's dead body. But I'm not forming my hunch from Baez's statement. Baez's statement is a non-issue, just like this week's announcement that Casey is a suspect.

 

[Diamond]

Sure he can. And he will have a co-counsel as well. How is a lawyer going to get experience until he tries a case? They have to start somewhere.

I found the details for Florida: http://www.ncsconline.org/WC/CourTopics/StateLinks.asp?id=112#Florida

Rule 3.112 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure (2000) outline the minimum standards for attorneys in capital cases:

Lead trial counsel assignments should be given to attorneys who: are members of the bar admitted to practice in the jurisdiction or admitted to practice pro hac vice; are experienced and active trial practitioners with at least five years of litigation experience in the field of criminal law; have prior experience as lead counsel in no fewer than nine jury trials of serious and complex cases which were tried to completion, as well as prior experience as lead defense counsel or co-counsel in at least two cases tried to completion in which the death penalty was sought. ​

In addition, of the nine jury trials which were tried to completion, the attorney should have been lead counsel in at least three cases in which the charge was murder; or alternatively, of the nine jury trials, at least one was a murder trial and an additional five were felony jury trials; and are familiar with the practice and procedure of the criminal courts of the jurisdiction; and are familiar with and experienced in the utilization of expert witnesses and evidence, including but not limited to psychiatric and forensic evidence, and have demonstrated the necessary proficiency and commitment which exemplify the quality of representation appropriate to capital cases.​

Trial co-counsel assignments should be given to attorneys who: are members of the bar admitted to practice in the jurisdiction or admitted to practice pro hac vice; who qualify as lead counsel under paragraph (c) of these standards or meet the following requirements: are experienced and active trial practitioners with at least three years of litigation experience in the field of criminal law; and have prior experience as lead counsel or co-counsel in no fewer than three jury trials of serious and complex cases which were tried to completion, at least two of which were trials in which the charge was murder; or alternatively, of the three jury trials, at least one was a murder trial and one was a felony jury trial; and are familiar with the practice and procedure of the criminal courts of the jurisdiction and have demonstrated the necessary proficiency and commitment which exemplify the quality of representation appropriate to capital cases.​

In addition, no attorney may be qualified on any of the capital lists unless he or she has attended within the last year a continuing legal education program a of at least ten hours’ duration devoted specifically to the defense of capital cases. Continuing legal education programs meeting the requirements of this rule shall be offered by the Florida Bar or another recognized provider and should be approved for continuing legal education credit by the Florida Bar. The failure to comply with this requirement shall be cause for removal from the list until the requirement is fulfilled.​

 

[Macushla]

This is from the thread about Amscot, the dumpster and the car. I THINK it is from LE's first document dump:

***Mrs. Sanchez is the branch manager of 7051 East Colonial Drive (Amscot Financial). On June 27, 2008, at approximately 0700 hours, Mrs. Sanchez arrived at 7051 East Colonial Drive for her shift. Mrs. Sanchez observed a white Pontiac parked next to the business' dumpster, but took no action.

On June 28, 2008, at approximately 0700 hours... Mrs. Sanchez observed the white car still parked next to the dumpster. Mrs. Sanchez notified the Amscot coporate office of the white Pontiac's presence. The Amscot coporate office instructed Mrs. Sanchez to call law enforcement to ensure the white Pontiac was not stolen, and if the white Pontiac was not stolen wait one additional day and have the white Pontiac towed away. Mrs. Sanchez called Orange County Sherrff's Office... and was advised the white Pontiac was not stolen.***

I think LE is positive that Mrs. Sanchez remembered the correct date. does this help clear up the confusion about whether it was the 26th or the 27th?

 

[Baznme]

I've read most of this thread and disagree with a lot of the premises. I would never ever have publicly said what Baez said (and is a central focus of this thread). If nothing else, the comment is in poor state, and lacks the professionalism that Baez should be reflecting whenever he comments publicly.

ButI think that the comment itself, on the merits, is so vague, so susceptible to many interpretations, that I just don't see how so many can here can determine that Casey knows where Caylee's body is just from Baez's statement.

I don't doubt for a split second that Casey purposely disposed of Caylee's dead body. But I'm not forming my hunch from Baez's statement. Baez's statement is a non-issue, just like this week's announcement that Casey is a suspect.

Consider yourself heard on "your opinion".

 

[liltigress]

I'm assuming all of these are PM messages. These can be done by phone, correct? Assuming it is correct that they were all PM messages and this girl is used to making 50 calls a day, this seems pretty quiet for her, don't you think?

These were myspace/facebook postings, I'm not sure which. Yes, they can be done by phone, which I think is important for LE to track her moves during this time.

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. For those 2 days, this is the ONLY activity I see for her.

 

[Baznme]

This is from the thread about Amscot, the dumpster and the car. I THINK it is from LE's first document dump:

***Mrs. Sanchez is the branch manager of 7051 East Colonial Drive (Amscot Financial). On June 27, 2008, at approximately 0700 hours, Mrs. Sanchez arrived at 7051 East Colonial Drive for her shift. Mrs. Sanchez observed a white Pontiac parked next to the business' dumpster, but took no action.

On June 28, 2008, at approximately 0700 hours... Mrs. Sanchez observed the white car still parked next to the dumpster. Mrs. Sanchez notified the Amscot coporate office of the white Pontiac's presence. The Amscot coporate office instructed Mrs. Sanchez to call law enforcement to ensure the white Pontiac was not stolen, and if the white Pontiac was not stolen wait one additional day and have the white Pontiac towed away. Mrs. Sanchez called Orange County Sherrff's Office... and was advised the white Pontiac was not stolen.***

I think LE is positive that Mrs. Sanchez remembered the correct date. does this help clear up the confusion about whether it was the 26th or the 27th?

Thanks Macushla!! I think it was LP that brought the 26th into the picture assuming she ditched the car the night before but I've seen no documentation of that.

 

[Seranade]

I can't remember his name, but isn't there another attorney from Baez's firm working on the case?

 

[indicat]

I wasn't asking anyone to accept this. If Casey killed her child, she should hopefully be punished in accordance with whatever criminal laws apply.

But for now, she's maintaining her innocence, and she wouldn't be the first person to ever do so. And we should all be grateful to live in a Country where the Government has to prove its' case entirely.

Innocent?? This is about more then just that, she and her family are maintaining that Caylee is alive and out there, I think what blows everyone away is that if she is going to maintain her innocence would'nt she have ANY pretext of looking for her?? showing ANY concern for Caylee instead of herself!! :furious:

 

[Baznme]

These were myspace/facebook postings, I'm not sure which. Yes, they can be done by phone, which I think is important for LE to track her moves during this time.

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. For those 2 days, this is the ONLY activity I see for her.

We are in total agreement here. I think we're right about these two days. They fit into the sighting of the car parked in the median.

Do we know what bumper stickers are on the back of KC's car?

 

[Fandy]

I can't remember his name, but isn't there another attorney from Baez's firm working on the case?

Yes, he stated that Casey was a "Steel Magnolia".IDK his name either off the top of my head, started with an M?

 

[bullet225ho]

There are over 25 originating calls or text from her phone on the 21st alone. and the same if not more coming in.

the 22nd is the same way. on the 22nd activity starts at 9:30am and goes past midnight and into the 23rd. some off time in there, but steady phone usage.

These are at&t records that I downloaded from doc.stac

 

[Seranade]

Thanks Macushla!! I think it was LP that brought the 26th into the picture assuming she ditched the car the night before but I've seen no documentation of that.

Well, when else would she have ditched it but the 26th? According to TonE's testimony he picked her up from the parking lot in the morning around 11 am. which tend to rule out her ditching it just prior to it being found. Unless you think he is lying or mistaken?

 

[DazzlinDebSD]

I think it is in Casey's best interest to come clean if she wants to save herself from the death penalty. Baez is probably going to hold out and wait for the official charges and then say, "we'll take you to the body if you reduce the charges on my client to involuntary manslaughter" The states attorney will most likely not deal this late in the game, body or not. They have an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence to put her away for life without parole.

Remember the day Westerfield was charged with Danielle Van Dam's murder? Feldman (attorney) met with the DA to bargain, and the DA told him to pound sand!!! Coincidently......Danielle's little body was found on that same day.

Caylee is now Casey's bargaining chip. :behindbar

 

[Seranade]

Yes, he stated that Casey was a "Steel Magnolia".IDK his name either off the top of my head, started with an M?

Michael Something or Something Michael's? I dont' know either, just wondering what his resume looks like.

 

[Baznme]

There are over 25 originating calls or text from her phone on the 21st alone. and the same if not more coming in.

the 22nd is the same way. on the 22nd activity starts at 9:30am and goes past midnight and into the 23rd. some off time in there, but steady phone usage.

These are at&t records that I downloaded from doc.stac

Can you see gaps of time (like 2 hours or so) in there on either of those 2 days?

 

[Marina2]

This is from the thread about Amscot, the dumpster and the car. I THINK it is from LE's first document dump:

***Mrs. Sanchez is the branch manager of 7051 East Colonial Drive (Amscot Financial). On June 27, 2008, at approximately 0700 hours, Mrs. Sanchez arrived at 7051 East Colonial Drive for her shift. Mrs. Sanchez observed a white Pontiac parked next to the business' dumpster, but took no action.

On June 28, 2008, at approximately 0700 hours... Mrs. Sanchez observed the white car still parked next to the dumpster. Mrs. Sanchez notified the Amscot coporate office of the white Pontiac's presence. The Amscot coporate office instructed Mrs. Sanchez to call law enforcement to ensure the white Pontiac was not stolen, and if the white Pontiac was not stolen wait one additional day and have the white Pontiac towed away. Mrs. Sanchez called Orange County Sherrff's Office... and was advised the white Pontiac was not stolen.***

I think LE is positive that Mrs. Sanchez remembered the correct date. does this help clear up the confusion about whether it was the 26th or the 27th?

If she called corporate on the 28th and they told her to wait one more day before towing that implies the car was there on the 26th as they had a three day requirement to fulfill before towing. If it were abandoned on the 27th, they would have told her to wait two more days. So yes, in a way, this clears it up.

If you believe her text msg to Amy though, she ran out of gas on a Friday which would be the 27th and goes along with Amscot employee statement of the 27th too.

I think I'm more confused now.

ETA: never mind, Casey is lying. It was the 26th.

 

[shannon718]

"It does her no good to show her cards to give the prosecution any advantage they have to put her away for life," JB said.

This comment from JB bothers me on many levels.

Thats okay Jose; she doesn't have to say a word. She is incapable of uttering a truthful one anyway. She is going to jail for the rest of her life. The prosecution has MORE on her than they had a on Scott P and he got the DP.

bye bye Casey.