When Kat gets out and on parole is she able to come and go as she pleases? Venture outside of NH?
I'm not positive, but I assume so. I dont imagine she will have much of a chance of getting a job locally.
When Kat gets out and on parole is she able to come and go as she pleases? Venture outside of NH?
Great job jury! I am a little surprised on the 1st degree conviction, I probably would have gone 2nd since I didn't believe a word that KM said. But, great job!
Thanks to all who posted tweets and opinions. It's good to have company watching this stuff.
O/T
CC ‏@courtchatter · 3m
VERDICT IN! #stoddardtrial. I knew this one wouldn't take long. Watch LIVE here http://courtchatter.tv/stoddard.htm
Omg Haunts....that pic made me cry.
I'm cryin like a baby here... :loveyou:
I am so happy that Lizzi finally got justice after all this time.
That monster is gone for good.
I finally just got to watch, my live feed skipped out too. He was guilty on FOUR charges, they skipped over the third M2. So only 4 were read. Correct me if I"m wrong. I was confused with all the twitter scuttle on the Ward lying garbage, saying you can't have both but the judge saying you could. My understanding was that you can't and I was getting confused. I just wanted to clear my messy head of confusion.
Final thoughts so happy justice was served for Lizzi and her family, but someone got away with murder, literally. JMO.
So now that we have a conviction of this killer and we have heard the state's case and evidence...do web sleuthers think that the state did the right thing in giving Kat the immunity as unjust as it seems? I'm on the fence...wondering if two trials could have gotten two convictions?
I can try Jewels 53 but can't posts links. Twitter folks were calling closing statement lies on Ward expressing you cannot convict on both M1 and M2. Which I believed Ward. Then Judge gave jury instructions and summarizing you can find guilty on all (paraphrasing). The MSM feeds came out screaming guilty on all 5 counts and I was super confused and thought maybe twitter guy was right. I listened and when they convicted on the two M1 charges, the M2 charge was not brought up so it was omitted. Just the tiny details that were swimming in my mind trying to make sense of the whole situation.
So now that we have a conviction of this killer and we have heard the state's case and evidence...do web sleuthers think that the state did the right thing in giving Kat the immunity as unjust as it seems? I'm on the fence...wondering if two trials could have gotten two convictions?