- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 95,672
- Reaction score
- 408,878
Ah! got an article in my alerts!
Nov. 4, 2025
Story Summary
TRENTON -- As they heard arguments Nov. 3 on whether to admit a key piece of evidence against Paul Caneiro at his upcoming trial in the murders of four family members, state Supreme Court justices seemed focused on whether the item was threatened by a fire at the defendant's Ocean Township house before police seized it without a warrant.
[.....]
At a pretrial hearing earlier this year, Ocean Township police Sgt. Jeffrey Malone testified he ordered officers to seize the DVR without a warrant because he believed it could contain evidence of the cause and origin of the fire and who started it.
Superior Court Judge Marc C. Lemiuex, Monmouth County's assignment judge who will preside over Caneiro's trial next year, ruled that the evidence derived from the security system is inadmissible because police took the DVR without a warrant. An appellate panel upheld Lemiuex's decision, leading to the prosecution's appeal before the state's high court.
[.....]
At the end of the hearing, Rabner asked do Outeiro when jury selection for Caneiro's trial is scheduled to begin, to which she responded Jan. 5.
That question indicated the possibility that the court may rule on the appeal before then, clearing the way for the trial to finally get underway.
Nov. 4, 2025
Story Summary
- The New Jersey Supreme Court is deciding whether to allow a home-security DVR as evidence in Paul Caneiro's quadruple murder trial.
- Prosecutors argue the DVR was seized without a warrant due to the immediate threat of a fire at Caneiro's home.
- Defense attorneys contend the seizure was illegal because the fire was contained and did not threaten the garage where the device was located.
TRENTON -- As they heard arguments Nov. 3 on whether to admit a key piece of evidence against Paul Caneiro at his upcoming trial in the murders of four family members, state Supreme Court justices seemed focused on whether the item was threatened by a fire at the defendant's Ocean Township house before police seized it without a warrant.
[.....]
At a pretrial hearing earlier this year, Ocean Township police Sgt. Jeffrey Malone testified he ordered officers to seize the DVR without a warrant because he believed it could contain evidence of the cause and origin of the fire and who started it.
Superior Court Judge Marc C. Lemiuex, Monmouth County's assignment judge who will preside over Caneiro's trial next year, ruled that the evidence derived from the security system is inadmissible because police took the DVR without a warrant. An appellate panel upheld Lemiuex's decision, leading to the prosecution's appeal before the state's high court.
[.....]
At the end of the hearing, Rabner asked do Outeiro when jury selection for Caneiro's trial is scheduled to begin, to which she responded Jan. 5.
That question indicated the possibility that the court may rule on the appeal before then, clearing the way for the trial to finally get underway.