NM - Tera Chavez, 26, found dead in her Los Lunas home, 22 Oct 2007 - #1

  • #2,921
If Levi testifies tomorrow it means his ego has won over any brains he has. If he does testify I hope that JUDGE ties serna down in his chair so he can't jump up and object every two minutes during the state's cross.
 
  • #2,922
Two things stick in my mind about how improbable suicide was in this case and point to the guilt of the one person who had motive. Tera's dad spoke about how excited she was about opening her own business, her own shop and designing the artwork her dad would craft for her. IMO she was looking forward and with excitement to her new life without Levi and two the gun was unseated and I do believe this was an almost automatic reflex on Levi's part, on his background and training as a PO, to have done this essentially leaving me with evidence I consider almost as good as a signed confession from Levi because I do not believe in the hocus pocus dead spasms theory.

Levi had motives. He removed the one threatening to expose his criminal activity with the staged stolen truck. Tera's threatened his job, his career and his ego IMO. Tera was also threatening his ability to fund his 'single' lifestyle with child support through a divorce. I also think he may have learned about Tera's lover and his ego couldn't tolerate an unfaithful woman.

Yes very good points. I hope the jury maps it out like this.
 
  • #2,923
We have had storms, bad storms, and just plain old rain here every day for 3 weeks or so. The storm we're having right now has created a major headache. I'm going to drink a cup of coffee and take my meds and I'll research him if I can't loosen my brain up a little. I remember his name but don't remember who he is.

I am going to have a cup of coffee with you.
 
  • #2,924
  • #2,925
I know his attitude would come out in voice and body language IMO. Plus he could get ripped on cross!!! I don't know though what if he is so pathological and so good that he pulls the wool over their eyes... some people are that evil and this guy could be one of them IMO. LC has training in the military and police academy on composure and other aspects that could benefit him. The evil boyfriend (that I have mentioned in the past) I had at one time I saw testify in family court and it was pretty incredible how he had the judge in the palm of his hand actually everyone around him and if I had not collaborated the ex wife's information she could have lost her child to him for full custody and she is a teacher in drama of all things. He was a military person (high ranking) and he was very good at speaking, influencing and winning over people and he usually got his way.

LC testifying could backfire and bring the jury over I mean who knows it is a gamble IMO on all sides. I am just really thinking this through my initial thought is yes testify but IDK.

Sadly, and it's scary too, I know that everything you said is true. It's always a crap shoot. But with the background info the jury has on him regarding the theft of his truck, the many girlfriends during the marriage, the quick re-marriage,...all totaled up he may not appear so truthful, even if he does comes off as calm and savvy.
And then I was thinking as I fixed my coffee a moment ago that this may just be a ploy on Serna's part to catch the defense off guard. LC may not have ever even mentioned that he wants to testify, but Serna is using it so that the defense may not be as prepared with their closing as they may be otherwise. McKay brought that up to the judge but, as usual, I couldn't understand what the judge's response was. I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens first thing tomorrow morning. I'll be thinking about this case all night....wanting a way to send some vibes to McKay for his closing.
 
  • #2,926
  • #2,927
Have such a high opinion of themselves, that they are often difficult to advise and control.
Most insist on taking the stand, thinking they can fool everyone.
I will not be surprised at all if he insists on taking the stand.

OMG are you guys hearing this deciding if LC is gonna take the stand in the AM!!!!
 
  • #2,928
Sadly, and it's scary too, I know that everything you said is true. It's always a crap shoot. But with the background info the jury has on him regarding the theft of his truck, the many girlfriends during the marriage, the quick re-marriage,...all totaled up he may not appear so truthful, even if he does comes off as calm and savvy.
And then I was thinking as I fixed my coffee a moment ago that this may just be a ploy on Serna's part to catch the defense off guard. LC may not have ever even mentioned that he wants to testify, but Serna is using it so that the defense may not be as prepared with their closing as they may be otherwise. McKay brought that up to the judge but, as usual, I couldn't understand what the judge's response was. I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens first thing tomorrow morning. I'll be thinking about this case all night....wanting a way to send some vibes to McKay for his closing.

BBM... Do you mean the prosecution? Yes you are right Serna would do something like that... nothing is past him. I will be thinking about this case all night too and sending McKay and his team all the best vibes I can muster up. You are right about LC. I am just such a big chicken.
 
  • #2,929
Just thought I would bring this over because it is about Farllely's testimony that Serna is going to have the judge exclude.

From the ABQ Journal, last update today:

Judge rules Chavez case can continue
By Jeff Proctor / Journal Staff Writer on Tue, Jun 18, 2013
POSTED: 1:10 pm
LAST UPDATED: 4:17 pm

3:41 p.m.

The Levi Chavez trial will continue.

In a series of rulings this afternoon, delivered to a packed, electrified courtroom, State District Court Judge George P. Eichwald essentially granted prosecutors a series of victories that will allow them to continue to seek a murder conviction against Chavez, a former Albuquerque Police officer.

Eichwald ruled that the state’s conduct was not willful. He therefore denied requests for mistral or an outright dismissal of Chavez’s charges that came earlier today from defense attorney David Serna.

However, the judge also ruled that Chavez had been prejudiced because prosecutors had “breached their duty” in not seeking evidence that was material to the case. As a result, state insurance fraud investigator Richard Farrelly will only be allowed to testify if he is called by the defense. But jurors will be instructed that Farrelly began an insurance fraud investigation after receiving a telephone call from the Los Lunas Style America salon where Tera Chavez worked. The jury also will be told that the investigation resulted in no charges.

Another of Serna’s requests was that testimony given last week given by Rose Slama, one of Levi Chavez’s numerous mistresses, be stricken from the record and the jury be told to disregard what she said from the witness stand.

The judge denied that request, but told Serna that he is welcome to call Slama back to the witness stand. “If you bring her back it opens the door to all of the other things she said to Richard Farrelly as well,” Eichwald told Serna. “The defendant does so at his own risk.”

The trial is scheduled is to resume tomorrow morning with testimony from prosecution witnesses.

2:45 p.m.

Prosecutor Ann Keener, in an emotionally charged statement this afternoon during a hearing on allegedly withheld evidence in the murder trial of former Albuquerque police officer Levi Chavez, said the DA’s Office would appeal if state District Judge George P. Eichwald suppresses the testimony of two key witnesses.

Keener said the state has the right to do exactly that — even in the middle of a trial — under a 2012 New Mexico Supreme Court ruling.

“Do you have the right to appeal a dismissal?” Eichwald shot back at Keener, drawing snickers from Chavez’s attorney, David Serna, and from members of the Chavez family in the courtroom.

“I’m not saying that I’m going to do that,” Eichwald added.

Dismissal of charges and a barring of the state’s ability to bring a new case is exactly what Serna has asked for today, citing what he says was the state’s failure to seek out reports and investigative notes that would have allowed him to more thoroughly cross-examine and possibly discredit key prosecution witnesses.

In the event that Eichwald won’t dismiss the charges outright, Serna wants him to declare a mistrial and order that there will be no second bite at the apple for prosecutors.

At the very least, Serna wants one witness’ testimony stricken and another prevented from testifying.

Keener, on the other hand, has asked Eichwald to call the witness who already has testified — one of Chavez’s mistresses — back to the stand for cross-examination that includes the newly disclosed evidence.

Eichwald will announce his decision at 3 p.m.

1:10 p.m.

A three-hour hearing regarding allegedly withheld evidence in the murder trial of former Albuquerque police officer Levi Chavez concluded shortly after noon today with Bryan McKay on the witness stand answering questions on cross-examination by Chavez’s attorney, David Serna.

After all was said and done, Serna asked state District Judge George P. Eichwald to consider one of three options:

Dismiss the murder and evidence tampering charges against Chavez, which stem from, as the prosecution contends, the fatal shot he allegedly fired from his APD-issued handgun into the mouth of his wife, Tera Chavez, in the couple’s home near Los Lunas in October 2007.

Declare a mistrial and make a ruling that the state can’t pursue a new trial under double jeopardy prohibitions.

Strike testimony given last week by one of Chavez’s many mistresses that contradicted his story about where he was at the time his wife died; and bar the expected testimony of the state agent who investigated the disappearance of Chavez’s truck.

Prosecutors contend that Tera Chavez told people before she died that the truck hasn’t really been stolen – but rather, the “theft had been staged” by Chavez and possibly other police officers – and that Levi knew has wife had repeated that claim to others.

Eichwald has not ruled on Serna’s requests, but he did give some indication of what he does not plan to do when he said he was ordering the jury back to court after a lunch break and prosecutors should plan to put some witnesses on the stand.

The point of the hearing was to determine whether, as Serna alleged in an emergency motion filed yesterday, prosecutors had withheld key evidence Serna says could’ve been favorable to his client’s case.

It was conducted outside the presence of the jury.

The hearing featured arguments from attorney Brad Hall, who is representing the family of Tera Chavez, Levi’s wife, in a civil wrongful death lawsuit against Levi.

Hall said Serna was deeply involved in Levi Chavez’s defense in the civil case – which Serna denies – and that as a result, he would’ve had access to much if not all of the evidence Serna says was withheld.

Hall also pointed out that much of the evidence Serna says he never got – including a nine-page report completed by Richard Farrelly, the insurance fraud investigator – are available to the public in court filings.

“This is obviously and clearly a tactical decision by the criminal defense team to try to get the state to provide information” that would’ve been available through numerous channels, Hall said in court. “Yes, my office has this information, but so does Levi Chavez’s lawyer, Norman Weiss (who represented Chavez in the civil case.) Mr. Serna, also, was a lot more involved in that case than he lets on in his emergency motion.”

Eichwald, after Hall’s arguments, ruled that Hall does not, as Serna asked, have to turn over to the court any of the documents he collected or produced during civil litigation.

Several times during this morning’s hearing, Serna argued that the burden to produce evidence and other discoverable items — particularly those that would be favorable to a defendant or would speak to the credibility of witnesses — rests with the state.

Farrelly also took the stand this morning. He testified that he never turned over to the DA’s Office notes he made during an interview with the Chavez mistress about her contradiction of his story because he was never asked whether he had information about the alleged murder.

Those notes were at the heart of this morning’s hearing. Neither Serna nor the prosecutors knew they existed prior to late last week.

When asked why claims from the mistress, Rose Slama, weren’t included in his report, Farrelly said: “Because it wasn’t part of the theft investigation.”

McKay, the lead prosecutor in the case, took the stand to testify about his involvement in the case from the beginning. He also testified that he would never have known about the notes because they weren’t mentioned in Farrelly’s report.

Ron Lopez, chief deputy of the 13th Judicial DA’s Office, testified that he met with Farrelly multiple times, and Farelly never mentioned Slama’s claims.

McKay also testified that he sent Serna a copy of a deposition Farrelly gave in the civil case “multiple times.” Attached to that deposition, McKay said, was Farrelly’s report.

The second time was on May 17 – the day after Serna interviewed Farrelly.

Serna says he never got the report.

“You can bet your bottom dollar, judge, that I would’ve been making a whole lot of noise about it if I had,” he said. “And I would’ve demanded to re-interview Mr. Farrelly.”

I’ll update this post as soon after Eichwald makes his ruling as I can.

BBM
 
  • #2,930
Have such a high opinion of themselves, that they are often difficult to advise and control.
Most insist on taking the stand, thinking they can fool everyone.
I will not be surprised at all if he insists on taking the stand.

Thanks KALI.
 
  • #2,931
Have such a high opinion of themselves, that they are often difficult to advise and control.
Most insist on taking the stand, thinking they can fool everyone.
I will not be surprised at all if he insists on taking the stand.

Thank you Kali! I must find my copy of that book. It's/they are bound to be here somewhere. I had to quickly unclutter my gypsy camp Sunday as we had company Sunday afternoon from out of town. Thankfully, I had a few hours notice and was able to at least clean off a few places for them to sit.
You all may remember in the Jason Young trial, he didn't open his mouth for years and years about the murder of his wife. Nothing, not a word to anybody and he refused to even speak to the police about it when they were in the initial stages of the investigation and trying to desperately to find the murderer of his wife. And then, wham, during the first trial he decided to take the stand. His big old ego got in the way. It was the very first time in history that anybody had heard his story and he poured it on thick. He thought he was smart. That trial ended in a mistrial....but!!! The second trial didn't, he was found guilty and even though he didn't testify in the second one, they played his entire testimony from the first trial and that's what got him a guilty verdict the second time. He wrapped himself up a few times in his testimony, and since the prosecution knew then what he had to say, they were able to bring in additional witnesses, etc. to impeach parts of it and expand on other parts. I was thrilled.
 
  • #2,932
BBM... Do you mean the prosecution? Yes you are right Serna would do something like that... nothing is past him. I will be thinking about this case all night too and sending McKay and his team all the best vibes I can muster up. You are right about LC. I am just such a big chicken.

So glad you caught that. It's this blasted headache. Yes, Serna and his smoke and mirrors magic land. I hope whatever he tries to do backfires on him big time. You are not a chicken, you are thinking in a logical manner--weighing both sides. Which is what I need to be doing. I have a problem with doing anything logical, especially thinking :)
 
  • #2,933
I know his attitude would come out in voice and body language IMO. Plus he could get ripped on cross!!! I don't know though what if he is so pathological and so good that he pulls the wool over their eyes... some people are that evil and this guy could be one of them IMO. LC has training in the military and police academy on composure and other aspects that could benefit him. The evil boyfriend (that I have mentioned in the past) I had at one time I saw testify in family court and it was pretty incredible how he had the judge in the palm of his hand actually everyone around him and if I had not collaborated the ex wife's information she could have lost her child to him for full custody and she is a teacher in drama of all things. He was a military person (high ranking) and he was very good at speaking, influencing and winning over people and he usually got his way.

LC testifying could backfire and bring the jury over I mean who knows it is a gamble IMO on all sides. I am just really thinking this through my initial thought is yes testify but IDK.

I too wondered about the threat from Serna about LC testifying and that is how I will describe it. In my mind Serna trys to put on this big act. I think this is possible to throw off the PT so maybe they are not prepared.

The way LC looked after court today he seemed pretty confident about, at least today's events. So I doubt he will testify, and I will be shocked if he does. He will be taking a huge risk if he does. Unless like you said he thinks he can really pull the wool over people's eyes.
 
  • #2,934
Thank you Kali! I must find my copy of that book. It's/they are bound to be here somewhere. I had to quickly unclutter my gypsy camp Sunday as we had company Sunday afternoon from out of town. Thankfully, I had a few hours notice and was able to at least clean off a few places for them to sit.
You all may remember in the Jason Young trial, he didn't open his mouth for years and years about the murder of his wife. Nothing, not a word to anybody and he refused to even speak to the police about it when they were in the initial stages of the investigation and trying to desperately to find the murderer of his wife. And then, wham, during the first trial he decided to take the stand. His big old ego got in the way. It was the very first time in history that anybody had heard his story and he poured it on thick. He thought he was smart. That trial ended in a mistrial....but!!! The second trial didn't, he was found guilty and even though he didn't testify in the second one, they played his entire testimony from the first trial and that's what got him a guilty verdict the second time. He wrapped himself up a few times in his testimony, and since the prosecution knew then what he had to say, they were able to bring in additional witnesses, etc. to impeach parts of it and expand on other parts. I was thrilled.

I was thrilled too. That was awesome. O/T but has anyone scene the video footage of Cindy and George Anthony's yard sale where they are selling off Caylee and Casey's stuff. Casey I can understand but Caylee,:-( Also you can see Cindy in her true nature. Very interesting.
 
  • #2,935
Just thought I would bring this over because it is about Farllely's testimony that Serna is going to have the judge exclude.



BBM

Good job Jewels! Thank you, I was glad to read over all of that. Seems like a year ago.
 
  • #2,936
I was thrilled too. That was awesome. O/T but has anyone scene the video footage of Cindy and George Anthony's yard sale where they are selling off Caylee and Casey's stuff. Casey I can understand but Caylee,:-( Also you can see Cindy in her true nature. Very interesting.

I'm telling you what,,,,after that trial ended with a not guilty I was ready to take myself down to Florida and seek those stupid jurors out, and ask them why, why????? And George and Cindy Anthony as well. Actually, I was ready with my revolver on Cindy. I didn't see the video of their yard sale, is it on Youtube? I am still sick of those people, that family, those friends, that jury, and the outcome. That trial will go down in history, and will be included in every teaching legal book that's written in the next 50 years.
 
  • #2,937
Forensic pathologist says Tera committed suicide
BBM I knew Serna was speaking about this journalist because he really made a point in the ABQJournal to emphasize the point of the failed multiple times experiment with the gun. That article I posted up thread after the testimony last Wednesday.

By Jeff Proctor / Journal Staff Writer on Tue, Jul 9, 2013
POSTED: 1:06 pm

BERNALILLO—A defense-hired forensic pathologist spent this morning on the witness stand picking apart photographs from Tera Chavez’s death scene and her autopsy report on his way to saying he believes she died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the mouth in 2007.

Chavez’s husband, former APD officer Levi Chavez, is on trial for her murder in state District Court.

Prosecutors charged Levi Chavez in an April 2011 indictment with first-degree murder and evidence tampering. They allege that he killed his 26-year-old wife with his APD-issued Glock 9 mm pistol in the couple’s home near Los Lunas on either Oct. 19, 20 or 21, 2007 and tried to make her death look like a suicide.

Dr. Charles Wetli testified this morning that he has twice been hired to determine whether Tera killed herself: once by the city of Albuquerque in a civil wrongful death lawsuit and again by Levi Chavez’s criminal attorney, David Serna.

He did not discuss his fees this morning, and prosecutors didn’t ask on cross-examination how much he’d been paid.

Wetli said from the stand that he would’ve expected to see significant injuries around Tera’s mouth had her husband shoved the pistol in and pulled the trigger, as the state alleges.

Instead, there were only eighth-of-an-inch tears at the corners of Tera’s mouth that would’ve been consistent with injuries sustained as a result of the intra-oral gunshot wound, Wetli testified, pointing to an autopsy report prepared by the New Mexico Office of the Medical Investigator.

Wetli said he believes Tera turned the gun upside down and used her thumb to shoot herself. That matched the opinion of the defense crime scene reconstruction expert, Larry McCann, who testified last week.

He also said on direct examination by Serna that he would’ve expected to see some broken teeth.

Assistant District Attorney Anne Keener pressed Wetli on the matter of Tera’s teeth during cross examination.

She showed him a crime scene photograph that appears to show one of Tera’s lower teeth possibly chipped and asked Wetli whether he thought that’s what the photo shows.

“I can’t really say … It’s possible,” he answered, adding that he would’ve expected to see detailed notes in the autopsy report about any teeth that weren’t damaged by the gunshot itself, which he did not.

Wetli agreed with Keener when she pointed out that he hasn’t gone to Tera’s death scene or personally examined her body.

Her questioning then moved to one of the most contentious matters of the entire trial: whether the Glock’s magazine was disengaged from the butt of the pistol when Valencia County Sheriff’s detectives found the gun lying beside Tera’s body.

Earlier testimony from prosecution that the magazine, which holds bullets for the gun, was disengaged, and that Tera couldn’t have disengaged it after shooting herself because she died instantly.

Keener asked Wetli whether he was aware that McCann attempted to demonstrate in court last week that it’s possible to pull the Glock’s trigger and release the magazine in one motion — an experiment that failed multiple times.

Serna objected to the question, saying it “mischaracterized the evidence,” then state District Judge George P. Eichwald sent the jury out of the room.

With the jury outside the courtroom, Serna said McCann’s demonstration wasn’t meant to be an exact replication of how the defense says Tera killed herself because there was no bullet in the gun at the time he attempted it.

“A newspaper reporter wrote an article saying that’s what I tried to do,” he said. “That’s the product of the imagination of a newspaper reporter … Ms. Keener wasn’t even here (at the time of McCann’s demonstration.) Maybe she picked up a newspaper.”

Senior Trial Attorney Bryan McKay, Keener’s co-counsel, was in court Wednesday at the time of McCann’s demonstration.

He argued today that Keener should be allowed to ask Wetli about it, saying McCann “made it very clear how he could do it in one movement — release the magazine.”

In the end Eichwald allowed Keener to ask the question in front of the jury. Wetli said he was aware of the failed demonstration.

As the trial’s lunch break began around 11:30 a.m. today, I asked Serna whether he was referring to my story on McCann’s demonstration.

He said he was, then added: “Just wanted to make you part of the story, man.”

I asked why he hadn’t asked for a correction on my story, which was published in last Thursday’s Journal, if it contained inaccuracies.

He at first said he didn’t believe a correction was necessary. When pressed on why he made the statement about my “imagination” if the story was correct, he said he would call Journal editors and ask for a correction.


Testimony is expected to continue today at 1:30 p.m. Serna is getting close to wrapping up his defense, which means closing arguments could be as soon as tomorrow.

http://www.abqjournal.com/main/219157/news/forensic-pathologist-says-tera-committed-suicide.html
 
  • #2,938

As the trial’s lunch break began around 11:30 a.m. today, I asked Serna whether he was referring to my story on McCann’s demonstration.

He said he was, then added: “Just wanted to make you part of the story, man.”

I asked why he hadn’t asked for a correction on my story, which was published in last Thursday’s Journal, if it contained inaccuracies.

He at first said he didn’t believe a correction was necessary. When pressed on why he made the statement about my “imagination” if the story was correct, he said he would call Journal editors and ask for a correction.


snipped

www.abqjournal.com/main/219157/news/forensic-pathologist-says-tera-committed-suicide.html[/url]


So Serna after the Reporter questioned them has to call the editors for a correction? Just more drama for Serna! imo
 
  • #2,939
CJ, I've been meaning to mention this to you since you told us about your going to law school.
About 35 years ago in a Dear Abby column, a man wrote asking her advice about returning to school, law school. He already had a 4 year degree in something else but was unsure about investing 3 or more extra years for law school and he ended his letter by saying, 'when I get finished, I'll be 43'. And Abby wrote back--'how old will you be if you don't go'? That's all she said.
That has stuck with me all of these years and I have drummed it into my children's and grandchildren's minds until they are sick of hearing it. We can never, ever get enough education and we need to follow our dreams before we wake one morning and it's too late. Again, I'm so proud of you and so very excited for you too!!!
 
  • #2,940
I was actually looking for a video for the Aaron Jones testimony. Then I came across this one of the Opening Statement, I hope we get a chance to look at these before the closing arguments. I did not find the Aaron Jones testimony other than a 2 minute clip from koat.

Opening arguments in the Levi Chavez murder trial - YouTube
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
99
Guests online
3,537
Total visitors
3,636

Forum statistics

Threads
633,023
Messages
18,635,118
Members
243,379
Latest member
definds
Back
Top