Yes, the article does say that -- but it conflicts with the actual bank records, which we have been privy to AND which are shown (as KC provided them to us) under "receipts" at the bottom of the timeline page:
Pilot Travel Wendover, Nevada ? 12/10/2009 ? 33.13
Remember, also, that at that time (Jan 20th), it was not known that Steven had attended Temple services at 6:30pm on Dec 9th -- as confirmed by three separate sources.
That makes it impossible to return from Ruby Valley (especially going through Wendover) in the allotted time.
I think it's time to put it to rest, especially since Mrs Koecher confirmed on the "Disappeared" episode that the trip took place on Dec 10th.
Have you had a chance to watch the episode yet?
The bank records would not tell the true time of purchase, just the day it posted to his a/c and the amount of purchase.
***A side note: Even the next of kin would not be privy to your account records....unless you are the beneficiary...or co-signer. Legally...until legal precedings requiring it would come into play.
I did not see the program, but if she did say the trip took place on only the 10th, then that just raises more red flags to me because that would be the 3rd time it has changed. (8th, 9th & 10th) As stated previously, I find it hard to imagine that after the many times his parents and family talked to members of his ward that the Temple visit wasn't mentioned until a month later. We are talking records of the church being available for that week. Should have been known very early on, imo.
Was the Temple visit and sources also brought up in the episode? It was never mentioned in MSM.. nor the sources? Just a post from FB...which can't be accepted as fact and the other two, IIRC could not be named and was to be taken at face value as fact, just because someone said. I can't verify that.
In the brief description of SK's case on the ID website, it had the wrong data regarding how long it was before the family knew. It had 2 days when it was 4. And I still find it troubling that the original video was not played in the episode, but it's still out there on the web. They normally will have actors to reinact a scene. Why did they when they already had the actual missing person on tape? It's not for privacy, because you mentioned the street signs were shown, so anyone on the net can google map and find exactly where it was.
Shows like that are good for PR and getting the person's name out there, but it doesn't tell half of what we have here and never could.
I think it's great that the show generated new curiosities and minds to make it to WS for their input. I hope they sleuth away our old theories and bring new perspectives...and maybe new theories as well. There have been ideas brought forward in the past that were never sleuthed...by anyone. They were either shut down or ignored...and I'm not talking about the SK and SP connection, but others.
As far as I know, you can post a link to a site with info, but you can't mention the addy or name here, on line. I can post a link to LookUpAnyone or Pipl just can't say who by name. It's up to the person if they open the link or not. Mods, I think that is within the rules, if I read them inappropriately, please let me know.