If we get something else that conflicts with it, sure. Not a theory, but someone else's word that they're standing by OR when logic tells us (based on something we've learned) that it couldn't have taken place then. We don't even know the time of day it occurred.
I don't believe in throwing out information, just to make a theory more plausible.
This is the first version of the timeline, given to us by Naegle on Jan 13th. Naegle didn't find out until later about TH and SK, and told us on Jan 17th. That's when SK's and AN's mothers got together and decided (weeks later) that Steven went to Ruby Valley on the 9th.
Obviously, anyone's welcome to create their own timeline; I have no ownership and would like to see what someone else comes up with.
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700014747/Database-can-crack-missing-person-cases-2-if-used.html
Does anyone know if this database has been tried in Steven's case?
.
On the other hand, maybe there are organizations that help the homeless, besides the group that provides meals in the park, who could be contacted to put out the word about Steven's disappearance and the reward.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/dec/22/nation/la-na-tunnel22-2009dec22
Laytonian, I'm not questioning your timeline at all, or what people say, so I apologize if my questions seemed too pointed. I really am just brainstorming, thinking out loud, etc.
It seems odd to me that TH doesn't say exactly I rudely interrupt dovebar![]()
continue dovebar
when he gave SK the money, and why (back wages? advance against salary? friendly help?). If I gave someone that amount of money, I think I'd remember when and where I gave it to them.
But then I think, my own memory is terrible and if cops asked me whether I met someone on Thursday or Friday, there's a good chance I couldn't remember unless something memorable happened on either day.
Random thought:
Maybe he didn't take his shaving kit because he was planning to let his beard grow? That would certainly make him less recognizable, also.
So it was originally thought Steven talked to GW in the afternoon on Dec. 13.
Did GW clarify this himself or was it the cell records, that confirmed the time.
December 13, 2009 11AM Paul Doxey called Steven from a PEC meeting to ask if he could attend a meeting that night. Steven replied that he was in Las Vegas, but could get back to St George for the meeting.
Still weird they were both in Vegas, at 8am. Yet didn't connect.Sun Dec 13 Las Vegas, NV area 8:57am 7:57am President GW calls Counselor Koecher, telling him that he's in Vegas .
Just re-reading the timeline
So he was planning to go back to St. George, if needed. So his intentions were to return.
Still weird they were both in Vegas, at 8am. Yet didn't connect.
Steven was a reader.
Perhaps he read this book, which was published in paperback in 2007, but got renewed media attention in the summer of 2009. It is about the society of people who live in the tunnels beneath Las Vegas.
Beneath the Neon: Life and Death in the Tunnels of Las Vegas (Paperback)
~ Matthew O'Brien (Author)
On the one hand, it doesn't make sense to me that if Steven planned his disappearance, that he wouldn't take his remaining money and a few possessions, like his shaving kit and a blanket.
On the other hand, maybe there are organizations that help the homeless, besides the group that provides meals in the park, who could be contacted to put out the word about Steven's disappearance and the reward.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/dec/22/nation/la-na-tunnel22-2009dec22
Just re-reading the timeline
Quote:
December 13, 2009 11AM PD called Steven from a PEC meeting to ask if he could attend a meeting that night. Steven replied that he was in Las Vegas, but could get back to St George for the meeting.
So he was planning to go back to St. George, if needed. So his intentions were to return.
Quote:
Sun Dec 13 Las Vegas, NV area 8:57am 7:57am President GW calls Counselor Koecher, telling him that he's in Vegas .
Still weird they were both in Vegas, at 8am. Yet didn't connect.
I can't see Steven purposely setting out for one of these "communities." There are a lot of undesireables in those tunnels. HOWEVER, if he did stay on the streets of Vegas for any length of time after he went missing and hooked up with other homeless people, he could have been led there at some point and living there now.
I sure hope that's not the case.
Yes, I find that very interesting also. When you are in the Elder's Quorem presidency, you know before Sunday who will be conducting the meeting. So if GW was going to be out of town, he would have already known and asked someone to conduct the meeting. Was it a emergency that he was gone? And I read somewhere that Steven always called when he could not be at a meeting,home teach,etc. I just find it a little weird...
President GW calls Counselor Koecher, telling him that he's in Vegas and asks Steven to attend the 11:00am PEC meeting at the ward. Steven says he's in Vegas, but would attend if needed. Webb says he's enroute to St George himself, so will cover it himself. Call lasts two minutes.(Source: KCN/phone records/Webb/Doxey) Naegle later spoke to GW: "He went to Las Vegas on the 11th and spent the weekend with friends in the Vegas area. He headed home on Sunday(13th) morning. He called Steven because he wasn't going to be in St George in time for the planning meeting and wanted to see if he could cover. He called when he was on I-15 passing the raceway in Vegas. He continued home and made it to the normal church meetings at noon." .
Yes, I find that very interesting also. When you are in the Elder's Quorem presidency, you know before Sunday who will be conducting the meeting. So if GW was going to be out of town, he would have already known and asked someone to conduct the meeting. Was it a emergency that he was gone? And I read somewhere that Steven always called when he could not be at a meeting,home teach,etc. I just find it a little weird...
bbm
According to this he had a week-end planned with friends.
Was headed back to St. George, yet called Steven because he wasn't sure he was going to make it.
So he was on I-15 passing the raceway. What made that call so important that he would know exactly where he was when he talked to Steven.
I talk to people too but I am not sure I could tell you exactly where I am when I do it. Now if it is a life altering event, like when my Dad passed away, Yes I could tell you where I was. Just seems like a little bit too much info. Like he wanted to really verify exactly where he was at. I don't know it just rubs me the wrong way. Is anyone else thinking this is a little bit too exact?