- Joined
- Nov 8, 2013
- Messages
- 5,307
- Reaction score
- 34,278
If BM did chamber it in the car at a different place from the home, it would seem to me to indicate premeditation on his part, no?
To me it would only mean being ready to defend myself.
:cow:
If BM did chamber it in the car at a different place from the home, it would seem to me to indicate premeditation on his part, no?
Sorry. This phone has a lot of trouble navigating this forum for some reason.
I can't really answer any of the questions but I agree with....I believe it was "Sonjay"
That eluded to that he probably already had one in the chamber, forgot about it and
When he racked the slide a new round entered the chamber from the magazine thus
Tossing the unfired round that was already in the chamber onto the floor.
It's also very possible he did those two racks when he was brandishing the gun at the first shooting scene and that instigated EN to start firing before BM got started, right?He told me that at the time that the shots were fired toward his vehicle from the suspect's vehicle down at Alta and Villa Monterey that he at that point attempted to load his firearm by racking the slide and he said that he was ducking down, he was very scared, and he may have racked it more than once which would mean a live cartridge would be ejected from the gun.
To me it would only mean being ready to defend myself.
:cow:
Sonjay quoted someone she refers to as Mogg. I assume that's an officer. If so, that tells me that's the answer BM gave the officer when he was asked to explain why the bullet was in the passenger seat. I think we can all agree that it being possible doesn't mean it's true.But when did he do that? And where?
But when did he do that? And where?
That's because you're not the type of person who would engage in a high speed car chase with a handgun.To me it would only mean being ready to defend myself.
But when did he do that? And where?
Also. I am very familiar with the Ruger p90 and the p89 (9mm) which I believe is built on pretty much the same frame.
And agree. Both bulky, heavy guns and difficult to conceal.
My guess would be it was a khar .45 or possibly a glock. Either a double stack model 30 or a single stack 36.
The 21 is a full size frame so I don't think it was that. He's a tiny kid and I'm pretty sure it wasn't a full size frame .45.
Quote within Sonjay's post:
It's also very possible he did those two racks when he was brandishing the gun at the first shooting scene and that instigated EN to start firing before BM got started, right?
I'm still reading hiandmighty's short notes. I'll read the entire thing later tonight.
In the meantime, I have a comment.
BM says the car came down Mt. Shasta shooting. He ran behind the truck and shot back. The car backed out of Mt. Shasta.
Think about this. That means the passenger side of the car was facing the opposite side of the street from the Meyers house the entire time. Even heading straight towards the house, it would have been difficult to shoot out the passenger window without sitting out the car window.
Wait. I'm going to talk to my expert witness.
I finally told him my previous questions were about a shooting. I didn't go into detail at all. This is tedious to explain our conversation so I'm going to share the exact conversation I had with my husband so you guys can figure out if I missed asking something.
MM: Imaging you're in the passenger seat, and you're the shooter in a shooting. The car is heading down a street towards a cul-de-sac. The house is on the upper left side of the cul-de-sac at 10:30 the driveway is at 11 oclock. How would you shoot at the house and driveway?"
(I show him a street view of the cul-de-sac since we have a bit of a disagreement on the actual terminology between a cul-de-sac and dead end street. LMAO!.)
Hubby: What type of car is it?
MM: Audi
Hubby: Does it have a sunroof?
MM: I don't think so. Let me show you a picture of it. (find picture and show it.) I believe it was said the shooting came from the passenger side. How would you shoot? Wouldn't you need to sit in the edge of the passenger window?
Hubby: What type of firearm?
MM: handgun
Hubby: What's stopping me from just holding the gun out the passenger window around to the front?
MM: You're a little waif. (I find picture of EN.) Wouldn't that mean you'd practically have your face almost to the windshield?
(That inspires my husband to ask the following)
Hubby: Who is the driver?
MM: They haven't caught him yet. They don't have the car either. I don't even know if they have the gun.
Hubby: What type of handgun is it?
MM: 45
Hubby: That's a tough handgun to shoot with one hand.
I stopped asking him questions then. I haven't even asked him to elaborate his thoughts.
It seems it's possible he didn't shoot as it was coming down the street like BM says. It also seems possible the car didn't back out like BM says. Think of how many 45 shots were fired on Mt. Shasta. That kid is a little thing with no muscle. A 45 is heavy and has kick.
I just asked hubby again if it would really be that hard to shoot a 45 that many times with one arm. He says it was heavy and had a kick when he shot one. He's only practiced with 45 at a shooting rage once. He says maybe it's possible if he shot it all the time and his arm was used to it. But I got the impression that EN only recently acquired the 45.
ETA: Sonjay & SpanishInquisition, you both have a 45. What's your opinion on waif EN having the strength to fire off that many rounds with one arm? How much practice do you think he would have needed to build up the strength to do that? I got the impression from the warrant that he only acquired this gun within a couple of weeks or so.
.
Take into consideration he didn't go to a gun shop and select the perfect gun for his frame. He got this gun off some guy, can't remember his name. I'm sure he got whatever the guy was selling. If he had options, don't you think a punk kid would buy the biggest handgun available t be macho? We can only speculate until we know what type of gun. If LE didn't recover it, we'll never know.Also. I am very familiar with the Ruger p90 and the p89 (9mm) which I believe is built on pretty much the same frame.
And agree. Both bulky, heavy guns and difficult to conceal.
My guess would be it was a khar .45 or possibly a glock. Either a double stack model 30 or a single stack 36.
The 21 is a full size frame so I don't think it was that. He's a tiny kid and I'm pretty sure it wasn't a full size frame .45.
Which point? The size of EN's gun? Or the bullet in the passenger seat?To me, this may be a point the defense can work with.
It was identified as a Ruger by the detective. So not a glock. (Glock was my thinking before ruger was brought into the story)...
That's an understatement. I've lived 25 years with this man's questions. It's his MO. He questions everything instead of outright stating what he wants to know or wants done differently. Just this morning, he asked, "What happened to the microwave turntable plate?" What? "What happened to the microwave turntable plate?" What are you saying? "What happened to the microwave turntable plate?" I have NO IDEA what you're talking about. "Forget it. That answers my question." In other words, he determined that I wasn't the culprit.He would make a good interrogator![]()
That's because you're not the type of person who would engage in a high speed car chase with a handgun.![]()
Put yourself in his mindset---chasing a car a high speed with a handgun.
Then what does it mean to you?