D
Deleted member 39678
Guest
I found an article about proposed changes to Nevada's self-defense laws. While I don't agree with everything the author states in the article I did find this interesting and relevant to this case.
http://lasvegassun.com/news/2015/mar/15/expansions-nevadas-self-defense-law-are-unnecessar/
Very few things are worth a human life, and so it is only legal to kill when the threat is urgent and severe. The most important safeguard, though, is the legal process itself. In order to claim the protection of self-defense law, a person must prove to a jury that the threat was imminent, the killing was necessary to prevent the threat, and the fear was reasonable. The jurys job is to make sure no one can kill a person out of anger, revenge or unreasonable fear, or target someone and then claim they were afraid. Its not easy to get away with killing someone, and that is as it should be.
http://lasvegassun.com/news/2015/mar/15/expansions-nevadas-self-defense-law-are-unnecessar/