SpanishInquisition
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
- Messages
- 2,924
- Reaction score
- 6,070
That's not how self-defense is supposed to work. Using that logic, any murder can be justified, because "I just thought they were gonna get a gun so I had to kill them first." He shot at the guy running away. That is not self-defense.
I was responding to your comment about GJ testimony that said this: "EN didn't want him to get away, by his own admission. That's not self-defense, if you are shooting at someone who is running away because you don't want them to get away" by quoting from the sections of GJ testimony where that was discussed. After providing you with those quotes I then expressly said this in that EN could have been wrong on both counts "It's not to say what EN did was right or that EN was right in his perceptions," so don't try and attribute me saying something I didn't when I went out of my way to say I was just proving GJ testimony showing what EN meant while me providing those GJ quotes didn't mean either his actions or his perceptions were right. In fact previously on here I've said that it wasn't justified provided that only TM and BM had been in the car as was testified because that would mean the threat ceased to be imminent at that point. However, you are using the term 'murder,' which has specific legal meaning, which if it was a shooting because you thought someone was going to get a gun would be manslaughter rather than murder, which manslaughter by no means justifiable homicide but is not the same thing as murder.