There was nothing wrong with your post!Or a movie! True. Good question about the compensation fund. My post was jacked up and I apologize. Of course the victims are the ones paying the ultimate price but GM is behind bars and the "clients" are free. That's messed up, imo.
It's possible that she is also keeping quiet because she still feels love and loyalty towards Epstein, misguided as that is. JMOShe’s holding out for political pardons, and whatever any of them can do illegally to shorten her sentence. Favors and special treatment within country club. She has leverage that she wants to use to her advantage.
I don’t see her ever giving up the list. Maybe when she is in her upper eighties she will write a book for one last chance of relevance and redemption.
Now I'm going all in on GM's travel prospects. Get this:
International Megan's Law prohibits the Department of State from issuing a passport to a covered sex offender without a unique identifier, and it allows for the revocation of passports previously issued to these individuals that do not contain the identifier (22 USC 212b).
The identifier is a passport endorsement, currently printed inside the back cover of the passport book, which reads: “The bearer was convicted of a sex offense against a minor, and is a covered sex offender pursuant to 22 United States Code Section 212b(c)(l).” Since endorsements cannot be printed on passport cards, covered sex offenders cannot be issued passport cards.
Passports and International Megan's Law
This page provides information about International Megan's Law which says we can only issue a U.S. passport book to a covered sex offender with a unique identifier.travel.state.gov
This will mean any new issuance (presumably the current will expire while she's in prison) of a US passport for GM will carry the sex offender identifier.
This is interesting:
During sentencing, she said her biggest regret in life was associating with himIt's possible that she is also keeping quiet because she still feels love and loyalty towards Epstein, misguided as that is. JMO
The judge seemed to think that was a crock.During sentencing, she said her biggest regret in life was associating with him
During sentencing, she said her biggest regret in life was associating with him
There is some incorrect information..... GM will be in a low security prison. As a sex offender, she is not eligible for minimum or "camp"."They're preparing for her arrival, already requesting that they don't want her in their dorms. And the camp counselor won't put Maxwell where she is not wanted, for fear that she may get hurt.' "
![]()
Inmates at Ghislaine Maxwell prison are 'preparing for her arrival'
Maxwell's hopes of a smoother ride after two years in Brooklyn have been derailed after a former inmate warned she faces maggot-ridden food and toilet cleaning duties.www.dailymail.co.uk
Oh yeah absolutely. Her and the whole defense from day 1 was to portray her as a victim. The judge rightly acknowledged that. She wont plead guilty, she's probably busy preparing an appeal. Her only regret is getting caught, like most criminals.She actually said, it was her "greatest regret of my life that I ever met Jeffrey Epstein.” calling him "a manipulative, cunning and controlling man who lived a profoundly compartmentalized life”. If she had said her greatest regret was associating with him, she may have shown a bit of accountability for making that decision to associate with him. Instead, she was regretful for ever having “met” him, with the implication being she had no choice but to meet him. Victim. Victim. Victim. To the end. MOO.
Yes that's what she said.During sentencing, she said her biggest regret in life was associating with him
So long as she's appealing, she's not eligible to be released to, e.g. a British prison. This is likely years. And, even if she won an appeal, for sure she'd be tried again. More years.Oh yeah absolutely. Her and the whole defense from day 1 was to portray her as a victim. The judge rightly acknowledged that. She wont plead guilty, she's probably busy preparing an appeal. Her only regret is getting caught, like most criminals.
Who did she supply the girls to and why aren’t they also on trial?So long as she's appealing, she's not eligible to be released to, e.g. a British prison. This is likely years. And, even if she won an appeal, for sure she'd be tried again. More years.
The victims have to name their assailants AFAIK and in certain circumstances, I don't think it's possible as JMHO they were overcome by noxious substances. If there is documentation somewhere, it should be turned over to authorities. LE could investigate crimes committed against children if they dug deep enough they'd find it. I am living proof.Who did she supply the girls to and why aren’t they also on trial?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.