NY - Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein confidante, arrested on Sex Abuse charges, Jul 2020 #5

  • #661
Hundreds of sealed court filings pertaining to the late sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein are set to be made public this week, and several prominent names -- including Britain's Prince Andrew and former President Bill Clinton -- are expected to appear in the documents.


U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled earlier this month there was no legal justification for continuing to conceal the ex-president's name and more than 150 names other "John and Jane Does" mentioned in the records. Preska ordered the unsealing to begin after Jan. 1.


...

This batch will involve the names of additional Epstein associates, alleged perpetrators, alleged co-conspirators, alleged victims, witnesses and former Epstein employees. Several of the "Does" mentioned in the documents are now deceased.


Full article at link ...


Court documents naming Jeffrey Epstein's associates to be unsealed: What to know
December 31, 2023, 5:04 AM
There's more recent reporting that shows that this list is going to be another dud. But it's largely being ignored today so the internet can keep the hype train rolling.

Let's be honest. IMO Bill Clinton is the name that list peddlers are most excited about being 'exposed'. And as salacious as the NYPost headline is below...the News Corp tabloid can't even find anything that points to any illegal activity.

NY Post Linked Below said:
Maxwell insisted Clinton never visited the island, and the ex-president declined to testify claiming he was never there.

Flight records appear to support the former president’s claims.

I can literally hear the groveling from the reporter as he had to type out that line.

So it seems ABC has seen the documents and the NYPost has corroborated ABCs reporting. And THIS...is the biggest story to come out of it so far. This is not going to be the watershed moment that the internet seems to think it's going to be.


MOO
 
  • #662
There's more recent reporting that shows that this list is going to be another dud. But it's largely being ignored today so the internet can keep the hype train rolling.

Let's be honest. IMO Bill Clinton is the name that list peddlers are most excited about being 'exposed'. And as salacious as the NYPost headline is below...the News Corp tabloid can't even find anything that points to any illegal activity.



I can literally hear the groveling from the reporter as he had to type out that line.

So it seems ABC has seen the documents and the NYPost has corroborated ABCs reporting. And THIS...is the biggest story to come out of it so far. This is not going to be the watershed moment that the internet seems to think it's going to be.


MOO
Clinton isn't the politician that I'm waiting for to be named. A certain other former president was photographed with Epstein.
 
  • #663
Perps that sexually explicit young women deserve to be publicly exposed, not protected.
Oops, the word I meant to type was exploit, not "explicit". Too late to edit.
 
  • #664
  • #665
  • #666
Flight logs, address books and guest lists aren't going to prove anything.

Just because you hung out with a nightmare socially a couple of times - someone who was probably purposefully targeting the rich, powerful and famous - that doesn't necessarily mean you did anything wrong or illegal.

I'd suggest there is not going to be anything incriminating in the documents

It's just going to be guilt-by-association and demonstrating-terrible-judgement-of-character reputational-damage to some more people.

It will essentially be cancelling.

I feel a little bit sorry for anyone who was just stupid and hung out with him once or in the wrong place at the wrong time at an event or something.
 
  • #667
Flight logs, address books and guest lists aren't going to prove anything.

Just because you hung out with a nightmare socially a couple of times - someone who was probably purposefully targeting the rich, powerful and famous - that doesn't necessarily mean you did anything wrong or illegal.

I'd suggest there is not going to be anything incriminating in the documents

It's just going to be guilt-by-association and demonstrating-terrible-judgement-of-character reputational-damage to some more people.

It will essentially be cancelling.

I feel a little bit sorry for anyone who was just stupid and hung out with him once or in the wrong place at the wrong time at an event or something.
Totally agree with this. When you are as wealthy as Epstein was, you are granted interest from elite social circles. I don’t believe just because XYZ was mingling on his private plane means they were privy to or participating in the depravity.
 
  • #668
Clinton isn't the politician that I'm waiting for to be named. A certain other former president was photographed with Epstein.
Everyone already knows Trump was a friend of Epstein. Unless you meant a different president?

Totally agree with this. When you are as wealthy as Epstein was, you are granted interest from elite social circles. I don’t believe just because XYZ was mingling on his private plane means they were privy to or participating in the depravity.

I believe they all either knew, participated, or just looked the other way. From all I've read and watched over the years, the impression is that pretty much everyone knew what Epstein was like, and what he was into.

jmo
 
  • #669
There's more recent reporting that shows that this list is going to be another dud. But it's largely being ignored today so the internet can keep the hype train rolling.

Let's be honest. IMO Bill Clinton is the name that list peddlers are most excited about being 'exposed'. And as salacious as the NYPost headline is below...the News Corp tabloid can't even find anything that points to any illegal activity.



I can literally hear the groveling from the reporter as he had to type out that line.

So it seems ABC has seen the documents and the NYPost has corroborated ABCs reporting. And THIS...is the biggest story to come out of it so far. This is not going to be the watershed moment that the internet seems to think it's going to be.


MOO
Do you have a link to provide.. hype train rolling? I thank you in advance.

I do not take sexualization of young girls lightly, and it is bad enough to keep it hidden, that our laws are not serious enough, and perp (who are convicted) the first time are let out, and usually re-offend repeatedly. all jmo
 
  • #670
  • #671
It seems to me such a primitive/vulgar blackmailing scheme.
No wonder the duo picked underage girls.
JE was very particular the girls were skinny - looking even younger.
There were cameras both in his mansion and on the island.
There are many allusions to Intelligence and no wonder.
It looked like a typical "honey trap", but usually sex workers are employed.

JMO
 
Last edited:
  • #672
8+ minute video

Re-posting this interview ahead of what could be a big day tomorrow in the Jeffrey Epstein saga when the names of as many as 200 people connected to Epstein could be made public.

 
  • #673
It seems to me such a primitive/vulgar blackmailing scheme.
No wonder the duo picked underage girls.
JE was very particular the girls were skinny - looking even younger.
There were cameras both in his mansion and on the island.
There are many allusions to Intelligence and no wonder.
It used to be a typical honey trap, but usually sex workers were employed.

JMO
Yes, sad. Actually, these were not young girls, they were children, imo. :(
 
  • #674
Any word on when the unsealed Epstein documents will be released? Today?
 
  • #675
Any word on when the unsealed Epstein documents will be released? Today?
I've seen a ton of speculation on twitter, but so far nothing from any official source.
 
  • #676
Perps that sexually explicit young women deserve to be publicly exposed, not protected.
Yes. (I knew you meant exploit)
The names of these privileged predators involved in trafficking and exploiting the young women must be released. They have been protected too long.
I don't care if the are Royalty, US Presidents, Bank Presidents, Supreme Court Judges, or members of the Clergy. Say their names.!
 
  • #677
I was talking with @MarkieMartin on @newsnation this morning about the unsealing of the #EpsteinFiles and, while I was on air, the SDNY announced the files will not be unsealed until Jan 22, earliest.

The extension until Jan 22 appears to be, because Jane Doe 107 (an alleged victim) has a new lawyer who has asked for more time to appeal the unsealing of her name on the grounds that it would be unsafe in her country of residence. She has received hate mail. She will give an affidavit in camera on Jan 22.

 
Last edited:
  • #678
Video is 6+ minutes
https://twitter.com/BrianEntin
"This case may have not been what everyone thinks it may have been."

Sure, Jan. moo

@BrianEntin

Ghislaine Maxwell’s attorney told me she has “nothing to say” about Jeffrey Epstein or the list of associates we are waiting to see. Full interview:


9:57 AM · Jan 3, 2024


Jeffrey Epstein list delayed until at least Jan. 22​

  • Names of Jeffrey Epstein's associates will remain sealed until Jan. 22
  • Judge extended Jane Doe’s confidentiality appeal by 30 days
  • Expert says new charges against named individuals are unlikely


Updated: JAN 3, 2024 / 09:20 AM CST

NEW YORK (NewsNation) — The release of more than 150 names mentioned in court documents from a civil case filed by one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims was postponed.

The documents won’t be made public until at least Jan. 22, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed to NewsNation.

The delay comes after a judge granted a 30-day extension to a Jane Doe to consider her appeal to remain confidential.
 
  • #679
First Names on Jeffrey Epstein List Expected to Be Released Today (Exclusive)More than 150 names are expected to be unsealed in documents related to a lawsuit brought against Epstein's co-conspirator Ghislaine MaxwellPublished 01/03/24 11:24 AM ET|Updated 5 min ago

Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein in Cambridge, MA on 9/8/04. Epstein is connected with several prominent people including politicians, actors and academics. Epstein was convicted of having sex with an underaged woman. (Photo by Rick Friedman/Corbis via Getty Images)Rick Friedman/Corbis via Getty
The first of 150-plus names connected to the Jeffrey Epstein case are expected be unsealed on Wednesday, a federal court official told The Messenger.

“The unsealing is expected to begin today,” Ed Friedland, the District Executive for the Southern District of New York, said.
The documents were ordered unsealed by Judge Loretta Preska in a civil case brought against Ghislaine Maxwell by longtime accuser Virginia Giuffre.

 
  • #680

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
2,946
Total visitors
3,080

Forum statistics

Threads
632,567
Messages
18,628,513
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top