Found Deceased NY - Joseph Comunale, 26, Manhattan, 12 Nov 2016 #2 *Arrests*

[Momoffourboys]

Any news?

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

If there is...noone is covering it and webcrims hasn't been updated.
Hopefully, our poster who attended last court appearance will give us an update.

 

[Momoffourboys]

Suspect in Hofstra grad’s murder at Midtown high-rise apparently grilled by cops without lawyers upon arrest

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/cops-bungled-probe-hofstra-grad-murder-article-1.2969606

 

[Momoffourboys]

I need a drink. Or a few after reading that!

GEEZUS!

 

[Inthedetails]

I need a drink. Or a few after reading that!

GEEZUS!

Yes, I just came here to post the link but it's already here. I need to re-read it a few times to figure this out, and I haven't started drinking yet!

 

[LaborDayRN]

I need a drink. Or a few after reading that!

GEEZUS!

:facepalm::notgood:

 

[Momoffourboys]

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/cops-bungled-probe-hofstra-grad-murder-article-1.2969606

 

[Momoffourboys]

Yes, I just came here to post the link but it's already here. I need to re-read it a few times to figure this out, and I haven't started drinking yet!

It gets worse every time I read it. I'm on #3. And fuming. I can't imagine how Joey's loved ones feel right now.

 

[Lawdini01234]

It gets worse every time I read it. I'm on #3. And fuming. I can't imagine how Joey's loved ones feel right now.

What a mess!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Momoffourboys]

What a mess!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

This is as bad as it gets, no? Sounds like a yuge cluster&$!?

 

[Anonymous123]

I feel like I need cliff notes. So basically LD said he wanted his lawyer(s) but police pushed him to talk and all that confession could be thrown out now?

Where does JR stand? Is he still proclaiming his innocence? If they found evidence when searching his place the first time and he didn't let them in and say it was ok to search at that time (im assuming without a warrant) would that too be thrown out?

 

[icantbelieveit]

It appears Rackover's charges are now gone according to webcrims with the exception of the driving without a license and bond has been reduced to $1

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/DefendantSearch

 

[Momoffourboys]

It appears Rackover's charges are now gone according to webcrims with the exception of the driving without a license and bond has been reduced to $1

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/DefendantSearch

Mg and LD cases are not even on Webcrims now. Maybe this happens when they update. It happened last week also.

 

[Inthedetails]

It appears Rackover's charges are now gone according to webcrims with the exception of the driving without a license and bond has been reduced to $1

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcrim_attorney/DefendantSearch

Whoa.

 

[johnjohn24]

JR next court appearance is on the 21st it says on the department of corrections website , bail still shows $300,000 or 1m bond

 

[HastingsChi]

If it is determined that NYPD violated the Constitutional rights of Lawrence Dilione and James Rackover, then NYPD must be held accountable. If two murders walking free results in less violations of citizen's rights by NYPD it will be a hard pill for everyone to swallow but that would result in them operating within the law and less violations of citizen's fundamental rights.

 

[Inthedetails]

If it is determined that NYPD violated the Constitutional rights of Lawrence Dilione and James Rackover, then NYPD must be held accountable. If two murders walking free results in less violations of citizen's rights by NYPD it will be a hard pill for everyone to swallow but that would result in them operating within the law and less violations of citizen's fundamental rights.

Of course. The Constitution must be followed.

Sure hope it was....

 

[Satchie]

I'm not a lawyer, but if I recall correctly, you have the right to not say anything except 'I want to consult my lawyer' when questioned by police. If someone does not remain silent or wait for their lawyer, but talks to police and answers their questions, I don't think that's necessarily unconstitutional. Of course, the police can't use torture or anything, but they can trick people by, for example, triggering their guilty conscience.

Secondly, I'm pretty sure they don't have to get a warrant in some circumstances, such as looking for a missing person who was last seen in that location, or being told by someone that they'd witnessed a murder there. They probably can't remove evidence, but they can go in and look for obvious signs of the person, a body or crime scene.


Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

 

[HastingsChi]

I'm not a lawyer, but if I recall correctly, you have the right to not say anything except 'I want to consult my lawyer' when questioned by police. If someone does not remain silent or wait for their lawyer, but talks to police and answers their questions, I don't think that's necessarily unconstitutional. Of course, the police can't use torture or anything, but they can trick people by, for example, triggering their guilty conscience.

Secondly, I'm pretty sure they don't have to get a warrant in some circumstances, such as looking for a missing person who was last seen in that location, or being told by someone that they'd witnessed a murder there. They probably can't remove evidence, but they can go in and look for obvious signs of the person, a body or crime scene.


Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

I have NOT claimed that there was or was not a violation of either of the defendant's rights; neither has a judge. There's not enough information yet to responsibly make any conclusion. Frankly you're making conclusions and speculating based only on what you think/hope, not what is known.

 

[Satchie]

I didn't quote you in my post, I was commenting on the filings/claims reported in the NY post.

I think the whole point of Websleuths is to be a forum for people to speculate and comment on things that are unknown!

Sent from my SM-T350 using Tapatalk

 

[BUcriminologist]

I feel like I need cliff notes. So basically LD said he wanted his lawyer(s) but police pushed him to talk and all that confession could be thrown out now?

Where does JR stand? Is he still proclaiming his innocence? If they found evidence when searching his place the first time and he didn't let them in and say it was ok to search at that time (im assuming without a warrant) would that too be thrown out?

Ditto. I definitely need a cliffs notes version here too. I'm confused, especially because earlier we all looked at the complaint filed by Gemma's attorney where it describes LDs confession. I'm curious to know how that description ties into this information here...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk