NY-LI 10 bodies found on Beach-Poss. SrlKlr-12/10-4 id'd; more found 3/11 #6

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #321
I can only hope she's young enough to still be at the age of thinking the universe is only there for her entertainment.

She was able to make a pretty sophisticated website, that's for sure.
 
  • #322
One would hope that those two guys holding up the photo album at her funeral service might have reported her missing!

I thought the same thing. : (
 
  • #323
It popped right to the top of the Google rankings already. Anyone know how to tell how long ago it was put up?

At least 3 days.
 
  • #324
  • #325
She was able to make a pretty sophisticated website, that's for sure.

Agree. And "she" alters/edits very quickly. Had noticed that prior to what was noted today by other posters (taking the text entry down a notch or two).
 
  • #326
I thought the same thing. : (

Depending on the LE agency and how friendly the person at the desk was feeling, they might well have been told that they couldn't report her, it would have to be the family.
 
  • #327
Actually I believe it was me that started that. And it was posted as more of a question and a possibility.

I had read that it is believed that some of the remains may have been already skeletonized when they were placed in the dumping site. And we don't really know how much time elapased between the girls going missing and when the bodies were dumped.

In order to do reduce the remains to skeletons, the sk would need a place to do the murders. A place to hold the bodies until they skeletonized or a place and a means to reduce them to skeletons. That reminds me of the Pickton murders to some extent. I believe that Pickton was believed to have processed the remains of his victims through his hog processing farm. And there were no intact bones to contend with.

But this also reminded me of the Heidnik dungeon murders. There was evidence that he "processed" his victims through a different means. And he was left with bones to contend with.

As to evidence of this, no there isn't any more evidence of it than there is that snuff films were being made, or that a hit squad was operating. Or that it was a Dexter type killing or a sado masachistic murder. It is just another thought to add to the possibilities that I hadn't seen mentioned.
Thank you very much for taking the time to clarify. I though I might have missed something. Since I'm def no forensic pathologist, I have no idea how long it takes a body to skeletonize. However, based upon what you're saying, makes a lot of sense. Anyway, again, thanks! :-)
 
  • #328
  • #329
Agree. And "she" alters/edits very quickly. Had noticed that prior to what was noted today by other posters (taking the text entry down a notch or two).

I also believe she took the Sluething from some posters here regarding the "John Pages" from this page here. I read about alot of what was on her page here 2 days ago. Very low class.
 
  • #330
She was able to make a pretty sophisticated website, that's for sure.

I don't know whether she made the whole site, or just that one blog post. Hard to tell from what's there. The site isn't hugely sophisticated; places like WordPress and many others provide templates and tools that would let you build that pretty easily.
 
  • #331
Thank you very much for taking the time to clarify. I though I might have missed something. Since I'm def no forensic pathologist, I have no idea how long it takes a body to skeletonize. However, based upon what you're saying, makes a lot of sense. Anyway, again, thanks! :-)

If one of the bodies is from 2007 it would have skeletonized in place.
 
  • #332
It popped right to the top of the Google rankings already. Anyone know how to tell how long ago it was put up?

That isn't that hard to do. The more times and places the site is mentioned on the web, the higher Google will rank the site. And the 'author' also has twitter and facebook accounts for it. Here is the part that has me puzzled.

Top of the page in the list of sections for the site. It says "Our Profile of the Killer" And if I'm not mistaken that is an entire news article that was published. I am thinking this may be a site set up by a news reporter? Possibly a reporter who is considering a book maybe?

If it is, considering the attitude of the one blog post, I don't think I want to read a book.
 
  • #333
That isn't that hard to do. The more times and places the site is mentioned on the web, the higher Google will rank the site. And the 'author' also has twitter and facebook accounts for it. Here is the part that has me puzzled.

Top of the page in the list of sections for the site. It says "Our Profile of the Killer" And if I'm not mistaken that is an entire news article that was published. I am thinking this may be a site set up by a news reporter? Possibly a reporter who is considering a book maybe?

If it is, considering the attitude of the one blog post, I don't think I want to read a book.

Yes, it is very journalistic like.....
 
  • #334
  • #335
Thank you very much for taking the time to clarify. I though I might have missed something. Since I'm def no forensic pathologist, I have no idea how long it takes a body to skeletonize. However, based upon what you're saying, makes a lot of sense. Anyway, again, thanks! :-)

This one kind of explains why the sk would need a place to allow the remains to go to skeletons. It is very noticable if they are just left in the area.
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-11-04/...ies_1_strangulation-victims-smell?_s=PM:CRIME
 
  • #336
looks like it was created on Dec. 14, 2010 through a domain proxy.
http://www.whois.net/whois/longislandserialkiller.com
http://who.godaddy.com/whois.aspx?domain=longislandserialkiller.com&prog_id=GoDaddy

That can't be right can it?

Looking through the site the earliest post I could find was 04-14-11

A response (to her entry titled, “My Trip To Gilgo Beach: Long Island Serial Killer Report”) is dated Apr 5, 2011. I had been using the site to read MSM articles since she had been publishing them in full there, and I used to look for her commentary, but had never seen her "blogging" until posters here drew attention to them on this thread.

When did posters first notice her "blog entries"?
 
  • #337
This one kind of explains why the sk would need a place to allow the remains to go to skeletons. It is very noticable if they are just left in the area.
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-11-04/...ies_1_strangulation-victims-smell?_s=PM:CRIME

I do think he has a thing with the bones. I think the burial site is his decomposition place. I posted some links and theorys yesterday on this subject. It is simply too much work.
There are 3 crime scenes.
1. Where he picked up the girls.
2. Where he killed them.
3. The burial site.
To throw one between 2&3 is another possibity of getting cought. Makes no sense....
 
  • #338
A response (to her entry titled, “My Trip To Gilgo Beach: Long Island Serial Killer Report”) is dated Apr 5, 2011. I had been using the site to read MSM articles since she had been publishing them in full there, and I used to look for her commentary, but had never seen her "blogging" until posters here drew attention to them on this thread.

When did posters first notice her "blog entries"?

I saw it 3 days ago.
 
  • #339
I do think he has a thing with the bones. I think the burial site is his decomposition place. I posted some links and theorys yesterday on this subject. It is simply too much work.
There are 3 crime scenes.
1. Where he picked up the girls.
2. Where he killed them.
3. The burial site.
To throw one between 2&3 is another possibity of getting cought. Makes no sense....

That is what made me think of the dungeon/cellar. A place where the killings could happen, plus where the remains could be "processed" for lack of a better word. A place where the screams wouldn't be heard and the odor could be somewhat contained.
 
  • #340
That is what made me think of the dungeon/cellar. A place where the killings could happen, plus where the remains could be "processed" for lack of a better word. A place where the screams wouldn't be heard and the odor could be somewhat contained.

The torture room is very plausible to me also. But I don't think he has the stomach for the gore and stench. Then why not stab or shoot. 1 body is mutilated, but that doesn't mean all chopped up. I posted a vid link yesterday explaining the mutilation theory. I bet he cut of some digits. Then later goes to the burial site to get the bones he really is after. But now his site is compromised. So be ready for him to try to strike again and change his MO. 100%
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
2,550
Total visitors
2,663

Forum statistics

Threads
633,037
Messages
18,635,434
Members
243,389
Latest member
Buffy_2009
Back
Top