missslaurenlady
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2021
- Messages
- 34
- Reaction score
- 269
One thing I noticed this morning, which I found bizarre, is how long it took police to get a search warrant.
Multiple reports, including this one, state that police made an "emergency entry" into the house on Saturday morning after following the blood trail to the home. It was at this point that officers located the son on the top floor and saw the blood in the living room.
Despite the officers evidently seeing blood in the living room, however, it apparently took them hours to get a search warrant for the house, according to the New York Post (snipped & BBM):
"NYPD sources told The Post on Tuesday that detectives had asked the Queens District Attorney’s Office for a search warrant shortly after tracing the blood back to Gaal’s house Saturday morning.
But investigators weren’t given the warrant until early evening, costing them valuable time in gathering evidence, sources said."
If this information is accurate, I am truly at a loss as to why it would take hours to get a search warrant if officers saw blood in the home at the time of the emergency entry on Saturday morning. In New York, search warrants can be applied for with an oral application, particularly in emergency situations, so it's not like the police even needed to draft a written warrant.
MOO LE needed /needs to be very careful what they do in the home with the minor present without someone of legal age to consent on his behalf. MOO this may be the reason for a quick arrest and release. It may have been even routine to arrest the only person in the home, since it was a crime scene (I do not know - I am not law enforcement. That is also not what I believe happened, but I am not going to share my personal beliefs and speculation on this forum). What I can and will share is that LE is being cautious and measured with EVERYTHING they do from a legal standpoint. The taking the long time to get the warrant makes me understand even further the possible thinking about questioning a minor. As we know, LE has gotten in a lot of trouble for coercing “false confessions” from minors. Perhaps they don’t want to be accused of that by questioning without an adult present. Who knows? Again MOO about what LE knows and what their strategy might be and who they may think might have information that could be helpful to the case.
i am not making any accusations here, just thinking about how LE works, particularly when it comes to minors. I am a mandated reporter as part of my profession, so I’m familiar with the laws around LE and minors and reporting statements to LE.