Thanks for posting. I've read through it and the basic argument appears to be the same - pretrial publicity makes it difficult to seat an impartial jury in Pike County.
They're arguing the media coverage was so extensive that its impossible for potential jurors to "shut it from sight". IIRC, the question judges ask of jurors is whether the media coverage they've seen will make it impossible to render an unbiased verdict. In this time of media saturation and social media, its impossible to avoid pre-trial media coverage.
It also suggests, again, moving the trial to the Columbus metropolitan area, where there are many more citizens eligible to call for jury duty.
It refers to Exhibit G, which isn't here. Perhaps it has source info, etc. for all the data about claims of media saturation prejudicial to GW3.