OH Pike Co., 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue, 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested #50

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #621
I heard them say that 11 out 13 they discuss the case. Almost every call discusses how they aren't allowed to discuss the case, but do.

Earlier, a motion for discovery for a box marked "important stuff". Defense wants the box for RN but pros say it was seized during the search warrant for the W4's. Doesn't pertain to RN's trial.

(sounded like it wasn't at RN's house at all)
 
  • #622
I heard them say that 11 out 13 they discuss the case. Almost every call discusses how they aren't allowed to discuss the case, but do.

Earlier, a motion for discovery for a box marked "important stuff". Defense wants the box for RN but pros say it was seized during the search warrant for the W4's. Doesn't pertain to RN's trial.

(sounded like it wasn't at RN's house at all)

Yeah, the box sounds like a fishing expedition. JMO, the lawyers for all the W's and RN have been discussing ways to mess up the prosecution and fish for info and evidence about the murder cases. I guess they want to use it to get info about the murders and evidence out to the public before the murder trials.

I've no doubt FW, RW, RN and all the defense attorneys are meeting regularly to discuss strategies to screw up the trials begin. I could almost hear RN's defense attorneys today using arguments and CT type objections that were probably fed to them by FW. They're probably all marching to her drumbeat.

JMO, it's FW who has been behind all the tactics used so far to discredit the GJ hearings. Who else would come up with the crazy notion of saying there was some "mystery police officer in uniform" in the GJ hearings that no one else saw? Who else would come up with the idea to drop hints in the hearing implying that someone had tampered with the recordings of GJ testimony? That's all FW's crazy handiwork, JMO.
 
  • #623
A very important piece of info against AW has been revealed here as far as the motion to revoke her phone privileges. AC clearly stated that in one of these recorded calls AW gave info to RN to pass along to another member of RN/AW family so that person can pass it along to JW. AW just shot herself in the foot since there is a recording of her contacting her co-defendants in the murders after being told multiple times in court specifically not to do so. JMO
 
  • #624
A very important piece of info against AW has been revealed here as far as the motion to revoke her phone privileges. AC clearly stated that in one of these recorded calls AW gave info to RN to pass along to another member of RN/AW family so that person can pass it along to JW. AW just shot herself in the foot since there is a recording of her contacting her co-defendants in the murders after being told multiple times in court specifically not to do so.

AW doesn't care. She thinks she's above it all.
 
  • #625
A very important piece of info against AW has been revealed here as far as the motion to revoke her phone privileges. AC clearly stated that in one of these recorded calls AW gave info to RN to pass along to another member of RN/AW family so that person can pass it along to JW. AW just shot herself in the foot since there is a recording of her contacting her co-defendants in the murders after being told multiple times in court specifically not to do so. JMO

Crazy, right? How bold of her, how dumb. I can't believe they were on the phone strategizing with each other about what to say or not say in hearings and trial. Talked about using certain words during their testimony to send messages? WTF?
 
  • #626
AW doesn't care. She thinks she's above it all.

She'd better hope she doesn't get out anytime soon because FW will probably have a contract out on her. ;) (ง ͠° ͟ل͜ ͡°)ง

She's blowing FW's "IT WAS ISIS" campaign out of the water.
 
Last edited:
  • #627
The feed has gone dark again. Reception hasn't been good from there today. Check some other channels.

Here's a link to WKRC Facebook live feed


Nvmnd. It looks like they just ended that one. The main web site now says they will be right back.

Now WS site is acting up.
 
Last edited:
  • #628
Crazy, right? How bold of her, how dumb. I can't believe they were on the phone strategizing with each other about what to say or not say in hearings and trial. Talked about using certain words during their testimony to send messages? WTF?
Absolutely astonishing. I am completely awestruck at the gall these people have. They truly believe they do not have to obey the law. After RN's performance on the stand a little bit ago, I certainly see where AW gets it from. Mind boggling to me, to say the least. JMO
 
  • #629
Weird coincidence that WS and the news feeds all go out around the same time. WS is back up, but news feeds are still out. Maybe they want to get ready for 5 oclock news.

So we don't get to hear the recordings of the phone calls.
 
  • #630
  • #631
  • #632
He's letting her off. Wow. That will be so easy for her to get around that order. Why doesn't he send her back to jail? Her elderly mother can go into a nursing home, JMO.
 
  • #633
Weird coincidence that WS and the news feeds all go out around the same time. WS is back up, but news feeds are still out. Maybe they want to get ready for 5 oclock news.

So we don't get to hear the recordings of the phone calls.

I have never seen such a cxxusterghuck in my life!
 
  • #634
Re stuff the defense wants info from redacted stuff and unredacted. He wants stuff "off counsel". They want to share the evidence and have access to evidence from murders, including forensic evidence?

Oct 7 will have a hearing.

Oct 21 trial remains

4 or 5 days

Adjourned
 
  • #635
I have never seen such a cxxusterghuck in my life!

Yeah, I don't have a good feeling about this at all. It's a mess already with multiple people defying court orders, sharing a lot of information, strategizing about how to screw up the murder trials and the judge really did next to nothing about it. With this many murder trials, so many defendants, so much evidence, etc. they're going to end up with a mistrial.

And if one case ends in mistrial, I assume the rest will, too. Because no one could ever predict that a judge allowing defendants to make their own rules and run roughshod over the court could cause problems, right?

These cases need to get out of this jurisdiction, pronto. If possible, they need to move them out of the state. I'm beginning to wonder if any responsible parties in Ohio want to see these people prosecuted.

Well, at least we have Judge Deering's number now. We know what we can expect from him - not much.

Nearly every county bordering Pike has serious corruption problems with their criminal justice systems. Why would we expect anything to be different in Pike County? It must be something in the water down there.
 
  • #636
He's letting her off. Wow. That will be so easy for her to get around that order. Why doesn't he send her back to jail? Her elderly mother can go into a nursing home, JMO.
Wow. Wow. Wow!!! I have been following this case since day one and today I just lost all faith in the Rhodens and Gilleys ever getting justice. What a sad day.
 
  • #637
I cannot believe this! On what grounds did he rule against the motion for her arrest?! I am beginning to agree with Johnny B. Judge D needs to go! JMO
 
  • #638
This looks like the recording of the entire proceeding from the FB page


Nope, it cuts out the part where AC plays the recording of the phone calls and the Judge gives his ruling.

Of the bad things that happened in this hearing:

  • Defense attorney was a bumbling idiot. He was requesting things he hadn't even filed motions for, and the Judge was practically granting them.

  • AC didn't really object very strenuously to any of this. Junk didn't seem to upset either. I guess they don't mind being made into fools for the rest of these trials as the judge allows the murder co-defendants to flaunt rules and openly discuss how to derail the case.
 
Last edited:
  • #639
I cannot believe this! On what grounds did he rule against the motion for her arrest?! I am beginning to agree with Johnny B. Judge D needs to go! JMO

I don't think I heard him give a reason why he ruled that way. I also didn't hear AC or Junk object in any way. They just seemed to shrug and go along with it. Will need to see if there is any surviving video of that part of the hearing that shows up on YouTube to verify what happened. My feed only picked up when Judge Deering was nearly finished.

He basically rushed through reading his decision to let RN still live at home. He droned on about how wrong it was for her to do that, then basically did very little. No reason.

The live feed going out when they were playing the recordings in the courtroom is really odd.
 
  • #640
Not sure which infuriates me more...the flagrant disregard ALL SIX of the accused have for the law or the fact that the judge is allowing it to happen. :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad: (one angry face for each of the victims, not enough angry faces in the world for what the survivors of the eight victims are being put through.....) JMO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
2,667
Total visitors
2,813

Forum statistics

Threads
632,119
Messages
18,622,350
Members
243,027
Latest member
Richard Morris
Back
Top