The forensic accountant didn't know, didn't find in his investigation, that JW had started a GoFundMe account to pay for his lawyer's fees in getting custody of his daughter after the murders.I missed this. What is this about?
I'm going to try and rewatch that part again, I'm remember both places coming into play also but that would mean, in my mind, that shots were fired from both JW and GWIV at CRSR.I thought that Jake was small enough to fit under the truck and that George had to hide behind the mower because he was to big to get underneath the truck, JMO
Is that the go fund me thing.The forensic accountant didn't know, didn't find in his investigation, that JW had started a account to pay for his lawyer's fees in getting custody of his daughter after the murders.
YesIs that the go fund me thing.
I think it was owned by FW and her husband.Yes, I recall that. I just want the exact facts. Was the Bethel Hill Rd. property ever in AW and BW name? I looked at the property website and FW and her deceased husband's trust are current owners. It is 845 Bethel Hill Rd correct? 117 acres last sale date 11/23/1993 with no sales history listed. Don't know how BW and AW could get insurance payouts on property that is not in their name.
JW proffer whether he is lying or not doesn't matter, the state decides if JW has testified to their satisfaction, whether the defense provides evidence or elicits lies from him on the stand is irrelevant, the state will decide if JW has fulfilled his side of the bargain, and they have already said in open court that he has lied (not verbatim) during the making of the proffer, and that some of what he said does not match the evidence (not verbatim)Could this happen?
If the prosecution can prove G4 is a shooter, and he's found guilty, DP comes back on the table, evidence from G4's trial convicts BW on the DP, then AW and JW ... or at least JW faces the DP for lying in his proffer.
Would that mean that JW and if AW's doesn't line up, that a trial would be in play for them?Could this happen?
If the prosecution can prove G4 is a shooter, and he's found guilty, DP comes back on the table, evidence from G4's trial convicts BW on the DP, then AW and JW ... or at least JW faces the DP for lying in his proffer.
I thought from the conversations played they were trying to catch up to her because they were trying to see if this was a BCI agent. (it sounded like he thought this car was trying to get away from them because they might have noticed it, like the random car that was a BCI agent wanted to run and hide so the W's didn't know she was there??) I remember him saying it was a certain plate and there was no luggage in the car or something like that. Pretty darn creepy and shows how paranoid they were.They tried to chase her down? I thought they were trying to lose her.
The thing is I'm not sure it would be something that would show up as a bank account until it was put into an actual bank account. I wonder if a Gofundme shows up as a bank account on it's own? I assumed funds would need to be transferred out in order to use them or have them show up as belonging to a person. Anyone could start a Gofundme in someone's name. It happens a lot in these high profile cases to scam people out of money. Sometimes the Gofundme creators aren't even in contact with the person they are saying it's for.. just trying to scam smypathetic people out of money.The forensic accountant didn't know, didn't find in his investigation, that JW had started a account to pay for his lawyer's fees in getting custody of his daughter after the murders.
one casing and the new owners had lived there for well over a year, so it might be their debrisInteresting location of the cistern?
Witness testifies that the cistern was located inside the old barn and shell casings were found in it.. Cistern was covered by debris.
JW proffer whether he is lying or not doesn't matter, the state decides if JW has testified to their satisfaction, whether the defense provides evidence or elicits lies from him on the stand is irrelevant, the state will decide if JW has fulfilled his side of the bargain, and they have already said in open court that he has lied (not verbatim) during the making of the proffer, and that some of what he said does not match the evidence (not verbatim)
JW is all that they have left to put GW at the scene, as I have previously posted he has to put the Walmart shoes on GW feet walking through blood at the crime scene, so I expect the state will accept that he has fulfilled his bargain if he just regurgitates the proffer that he and the state have agreed upon
the state has bolstered JW throughout this trial, which is why we got to hear AW audio of her lying over and over to LE at the border, and her utter stupefaction when they began to reveal all the evidence they had collected, she then asked for a lawyer, we did not get to hear JW audio, where I expect he lied as frequently as AW, AC and the state appear to think that AW testimony is not as important to their case
Would that mean that JW and if AW's doesn't line up, that a trial would be in play for them?
I don't know why the state keeps going over and over testimony, we finally appear to be getting to evidence that points to GW but I am still waiting to hear things he did in furtherance of any conspiracyI don't know why they keep emphasing the go fund me account. It has nothing to do with the actual murders. It just seems like another attempt to deflect. I don't know. Anyway, jmo
I think it was just the fact that the forensic accountant guy never found it nor did the investigators tell him about it. So two strikes against that forensic accountant witness today because he also was testifying that purchases in one joint account with AW were GWIV's purchase but the account was really GWIII's joint account with AW.I don't know why they keep emphasing the go fund me account. It has nothing to do with the actual murders. It just seems like another attempt to deflect. I don't know. Anyway, jmo