Try Todd dykes, c franciscoAm I missing something today? I don't see any tweets from media from morning session. <shrug>
Try Todd dykes, c franciscoAm I missing something today? I don't see any tweets from media from morning session. <shrug>
But a witness, like JW, who comes to testify thinking they won't be on camera or audio will be too traumatized when they find out they can't opted out to testify correctly and the ones who are inmates may feel it puts them in more peril back at their jailhouse digs.There won’t be a mistrial over the option in or out. It has zero to do with the case being tried. Like Deering said, they don’t know who will be called until the last minute in some cases, then they don’t know if the witness will opt out till the last minute. They would have to stop the regular trial for a separate hearing each time a witness opts out. The trial would take forever to get finished with all that going on. He also said it was a state mandate, not his mandate, that people could opt out….
He was sticking to it until JW's lawyer mentioned his safety in prison being put in peril, then the prosecution got up and said they agreed with that and we can call witness(es) to testify to that...judge said ok, they did called one prison guard who basically said, yeah "snitches get stitches"...that's all it took...ridiculous, IMO
Must he all those reporters coming and going, there's no empty seats for them to sit in the back rows, which is how the judge ordered it done...if you got out and come back in you must sit in the back rows
Quick recap of morning in George Wagner IV trial in Pike Co. Was in courtroom all morning with no phone. Judge ruled Jake could continue to opt out in morning hearing. Later the appeals court clarified its ruling from yesterday, saying people could continue to opt out
@local12
Jake retook the stand at about 10:30 a.m. and testified for 20 minutes before another delay - the fire marshall was called for possible overcrowding in the courtroom. Proceedings continued until 12:30 - and back at 1:45 p.m.
@local12
Highlights of today included seeing the actual murder weapons for the first time. Jake identified all the parts from all three guns he had cut up and that were recovered from the cement buckets in lake at Flying W ranch.
@local12
Jake testified he told his father he had no regrets about the homicides but that he lied because he didn't want his father to think he did something that wasn't worth it and then commit suicide.
@local12
He said he was arrested in November 2018. Soon after that, his grandmother Rita Newcomb recanted and admitted she didn't notarize the custody documents. He said that affected him and made him not want to lie anymore.
@local12
"It seemed like it was the answer I was looking for -- that it was an answer from God?" prosecutor asked. "It was what I was praying for." Rita had pleaded guilty in December 2019 - shortly thereafter, Jake confessed to his lawyers "to get it off my chest."
@local12
Must he all those reporters coming and going, there's no empty seats for them to sit in the back rows, which is how the judge ordered it done...if you got out and come back in you must sit in the back rows
"Jake retook the stand at about 10:30 a.m. and testified for 20 minutes before another delay - the fire marshall was called for possible overcrowding in the courtroom. Proceedings continued until 12:30 - and back at 1:45 p.m."
I'm back online now. Yes, will do Friday tweets. No court on Thursday. Will start to gather all tweets for today unless you have already done so. Need a bit of time. Will finish out the day with pm tweets.@arielilane - just checking with you - can you do Friday's tweets, since there is no court tomorrow, as far as I know. I can do morning ones - the afternoons are way too late for me!I'm old! LOL!
![]()
Yep, I could tell when judge was saying, ok but anyone who leaves and comes back in has to sit in the back rows so they don't disturb proceedings. They showed the people in the back rows leaning forward and looking around their rows, then looking at one another shaking their heads like, well I don't know where he's thinking they're gonna sit, I'm not giving them my seat.It's a small, old courtroom in a very poor county. I wonder if there's a way they can allow them back in by watching from the satellite room they have set up upstairs with a live feed that includes the witness testifying.
IMO, America's courts are archaic. The states need to revisit what "testifying in public/open court consists of. We here online ARE the public.There's a simple solution to all this, a compromise. What's the difference between pen and paper in the courtroom or write only tablets (like the old Kindles were capable of) connected to wifi in the courtroom? Absolutely no difference in this day and age.
It actually would get rid of the need for reporters to leave and come back in problem. Why isn't this being discussed as an option? It's so simple a solution. No camera, no audio, just words being published FROM the courtroom in real time. Are they afraid the public will know every single thing that's said and done?
AJMO
I can help. I see Betty P got James Pilchner.
Courtney hasn't posted in an hour, she ended with Jake/Billy no regrets conversation. Was that posted here earlier? When was last update (prior to Betty P?)
I'm back online now. Yes, will do Friday tweets. No court on Thursday. Will start to gather all tweets for today unless you have already done so. Need a bit of time. Will finish out the day with pm tweets.
[/QUOTE
@arielilane
I've got Todd Dykes pulled up now & will post it & let you finish the rest.
Yes and everywhere, every courthouse must have wifi, it's really a no-brainer to me, lets them transcribe in real time on tablets over wifi.IMO, America's courts are archaic. The states need to revisit what "testifying in public/open court consists of. We here online ARE the public.
But, why should we be required to be "in-person" to hear live testimony? THIS is truly the subject at hand here.
Should this case end up with SCOTUS it would upend our entire legal system as it stands now (if SCOTUS refers the case to the full court.) Of course there should be exceptions. JW and AW are not secretive/whistleblowers, some LE who require protection, they're convicted felons.
JMO's.
I don't think the US Supreme Court allows video. I don't know about audio.IMO, America's courts are archaic. The states need to revisit what "testifying in public/open court consists of. We here online ARE the public.
But, why should we be required to be "in-person" to hear live testimony? THIS is truly the subject at hand here.
Should this case end up with SCOTUS it would upend our entire legal system as it stands now (if SCOTUS refers the case to the full court.) Of course there should be exceptions. JW and AW are not secretive/whistleblowers, some LE who require protection, they're convicted felons.
JMO's.
Is there an elevator in that building? If not, how do they provide accessibility to those not ambulatory? Surely they are ADA compliant. Then again, perhaps not.It's a small, old courtroom in a very poor county. I wonder if there's a way they can allow them back in by watching from the satellite room they have set up downstairs with a live feed that includes the witness testifying.
ETA: I always notice when they pan the camera up to the ceiling - those chandeliers are antique "gasoliers", gaslight fixtures converted to electric lights. Those are antique "Eastlake" fixtures from around the Victorian era. I did a google search and each one of those is probably worth $10,000 to $20,000. Pretty rare.
![]()
Antique Lighthouse - UNIQUE 12-arm gasolier, Eastlake based
FULLY RESTORED. Fantastic and unique high-Victorian American gilt-brass gas chandelier, yet based off of Eastlake styling. A very rare piece, probably one-of-a-kind in the world, it has twelve gas arwww.antiquelighthouse.com
I'm back online now. Yes, will do Friday tweets. No court on Thursday. Will start to gather all tweets for today unless you have already done so. Need a bit of time. Will finish out the day with pm tweets.