- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
- Messages
- 13,067
- Reaction score
- 103,528
I am not understanding what seems to me to be justifying a legal charge of 'sex with a minor' (OR however it is worded in the indictment).
Could someone please explain to me why it is OK for a 15 year old to have sex with a 20 year old? It is in the indictmenth
I am not trying to be difficult either. I think we are supposed to follow the legal laws.
I did have the numerical number wrong with JW and it should be 2950.
It concerned me when I heard (not on here) some people say that a 15 year old getting pregnant by a 20 year old is 'typical for the area' so there's nothing there. I believe that it is unacceptable. It doesn't matter to me about their parent's ages or anything else. We are a progressive society, should abide by the laws especially regarding child sex with an adult and we don't make special sex laws or certain provisions or exceptions for any particular region.
I know that the people in that area, do not want their daughters/sons having sex with an adult.
Here's something to ponder OhioBlues. Jake is being charged now with having sex with a minor because the court found out about it right? Well then, when he went to court and filed for custody, 6 days after the murders, why wasn't he charged then for sex with a minor? Obviously the court knew his age in May 2016----the court didn't just figure it all out in November 2018.