In honor of St. Patrick's Day I'm sharing one of my favorite expressions. Obviously Fred must like it as well............
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this mornings The Plain Dealer article. I guess at this point, nothing should surprise me.
Does anyone think the timing of last Friday’s “Motion to Dismiss Indictment” was a coincidental prelude to today’s feature article on FW?
No verifiable facts in that story, just spin, and theatrics. Could easily be fiction. Possibly unrelated facts woven together by FW and her attorney into a story.
All we know
for fact is there are two BPV's in evidence and documentation from Amazon (it's content and relevance unknown) and that FW perjured herself in her GJ testimony. We have
no idea how those facts might actually be related in the Indictment.
I have a hard time believing that AC and her team have made such a glaring mistake on receipts. AC is too sharp. But in the meantime, FW has gotten her publicity machine going and there is no one that can challenge her version of the story because they are under a gag order. On the surface, the Prosecution was made to look foolish and I guess that was the intent of the article.
Rather than dismissing the current count of Obstructing Justice, I think I’d add another count for discussing her Grand Jury testimony again in this interview.
MOO
ETA - I will go back and watch FW's court appearance again, and make corrections if needed.