rsd1200
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 11,477
- Reaction score
- 30,754
I have 2 theories with respect to the children: Having the children or Saving the children.
Scenario A) Assaillant(s) were hoping to gain custody or access to children or were upset to be denied as parent.
I think about the father and other men. But there were also previous cases where a woman killed for a child. Especially in an area where having a baby seems to be a factor of social inclusion.
In this scenario, the assailant(s) had some kind of relationship with KR.
and/or Scenario B) Assaillant(s) believed the family members were a threat to the children and/or to the community due to their history, lifestyle or behaviour.
This would make it a "people's justice" or a hate crime. In this case, I would look for extremists, paramilitary, religious fanatics. The assailant(s) would have needed complicity from another person close to the victims.
UBM
With HR, I see she and her first child's father as having a fairly good working relationship. He doesn't seem to be a man of means but he does take care of his child. HR had sent CG the ultrasound pic w/the date of the ultrasound and her LMP. That would give a pretty specific time of conception. (Ultrasounds are scary accurate these days. One of my grandkids was born on the due date and another within a couple hours after the due date.) Did she send it to taunt him? Or did she send it to show him to prove that the baby could very well be his? He seemed to warm to the idea of being a father. There's only a very short window of time that she could have conceived. Did the third possibility see that ultrasound, posted on CG's FB wall, and think, OH %^$#/!!! My life is over as I know it!!! ??